what race r u?

This is the place for general discussions on fetishes, sexuality and anything else. What's on your mind right now?
User avatar
geronimo
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:08 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by geronimo »

subglyn wrote:I really don't think there is a 'natural' difference that makes men more likely to be dominant and women more likely to be submissive. I think the way we are socialized tends to produce those results. It's presented as the norm of even vanilla sex by most of society. I also think there a lot of dominant women out there who don't make it well known.
Exactly.
pindanot
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 10:33 pm

Post by pindanot »

subglyn wrote:I also think there a lot of dominant women out there who don't make it well known.
I think many woman are dominant, they're just not dominating us the way we fantasize about it.

I'm caucasian, btw.
goldenshowers
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by goldenshowers »

apparently the term 'vanilla' sex comes from the idea that white people have less interesting sex than other races.. or at least that's what wikipedia suggests..

'Vanilla sex” may also be intended by the user to indicate "Caucasian" in the stereotypical but unfounded belief that such cultures are less sexually adventurous and promiscuous than others' ...

interesting but completely irrelevant really


and for me i enjoy the whole domination fantasy because in the rest of my life i hate being controlled and am quite dominant.. i think it's freud who said something about your negative experiences as a child developing your positive sexual experiences as you grow..

humans are fascinating. (hello i'm quite new by the way although have been on this site countless times)
alpahde5
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 319
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:07 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by alpahde5 »

well that's just a load of rubbish, I think the general UK population would say it means refering to relatively boring, missionary style sex or less flamboyant form of intercourse- ok just not in those terms
webtease requests? msg me here first then add me to msn, [email protected] (e-mail doesn't work so don't e-mail that address)

what is written below is true
--------------------------------
what is written above is a lie
goldenshowers
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by goldenshowers »

yeah i don't agree with the term at all but i thought it would be an interesting point to add..
User avatar
dark
Co-Admin
Co-Admin
Posts: 1355
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Germany

Post by dark »

goldenshowers wrote:...
apparently the term 'vanilla' sex comes from the idea that white people have less interesting sex than other races.. or at least that's what wikipedia suggests..
...
Was this WIKI text written by a non white? :lol: The term vanilla comes from the flavor. You know the most people on this planet like vanilla ice, but some people think it tastes too simple and they choose strawberry.

Vanilla means: Simple, Boring, Common...

That is what I heard about, maybe I should edit this article :-|

And sorry but another critisizing point is, that Freud was good when he lived. But now we know a lot of his theories are too simple and wrong. He was a great scientist but on the other hand some theories are just crap. But I also think it has something to do with my dominant personality which I have since I was born.

Ok although I disagreed your post I am glad you are here. Welcome :-)

edit: damn I was slow! but I have to read every of my posts 3 times and think about grammar etc. bla bla :-/
goldenshowers
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by goldenshowers »

haha hello :) no that's ok i was just making observations i have no real idea how the human mind works, just enjoying speculation!

and yes wikipedia is completely biased at the best of times..

hmm this post seems too short to really validate its existence i feel like i should contribute more..
User avatar
dark
Co-Admin
Co-Admin
Posts: 1355
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Germany

Post by dark »

goldenshowers wrote:haha hello :) no that's ok i was just making observations i have no real idea how the human mind works, just enjoying speculation!

and yes wikipedia is completely biased at the best of times..

hmm this post seems too short to really validate its existence i feel like i should contribute more..
No it's ok. You already did more than ten thousands of visitors per month ;-)
i have no real idea how the human mind works
Nobody knows that. And I hope we will never find out. I think some things should be a secret for us humans forever.
User avatar
geronimo
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:08 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by geronimo »

dark wrote:Freud was good when he lived. But now we know a lot of his theories are too simple and wrong. He was a great scientist but on the other hand some theories are just crap.
Hey, dont trash the Freud-man, he revolutionized the way we think about the human psyche, and most of what he said still holds true even though he himself also realised that new science and new techniques after his death would bring us further and that his works weren't complete. Oh and I'm sure all women have penis envy! Freud wouldn't just blurt that out ... would he?
User avatar
dark
Co-Admin
Co-Admin
Posts: 1355
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Germany

Post by dark »

geronimo wrote:
dark wrote:Freud was good when he lived. But now we know a lot of his theories are too simple and wrong. He was a great scientist but on the other hand some theories are just crap.
Hey, dont trash the Freud-man, he revolutionized the way we think about the human psyche, and most of what he said still holds true even though he himself also realised that new science and new techniques after his death would bring us further and that his works weren't complete. Oh and I'm sure all women have penis envy! Freud wouldn't just blurt that out ... would he?
I agree if you say he revolutioned our thinking of the human psyche, but it's not reasonable to describe his theories as the absolute truth. Because some theories are too simple and some are just wrong. You can't compare the first Ford motor with the newest Ferrari motor ;-) Knowledge is always in progress.

Siegmund Freud was a great scientist.
User avatar
dominion
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:57 am

Post by dominion »

I'm yellow :-D
User avatar
dark
Co-Admin
Co-Admin
Posts: 1355
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Germany

Post by dark »

dominion wrote:I'm yellow :-D
It seems we have a lot of Asians here. That's cool 8-)
User avatar
chastiseme
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:58 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Contact:

Post by chastiseme »

i'm just a white boy :-D
alpahde5
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 319
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:07 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by alpahde5 »

im white and nerdy, just so white and nerdy
webtease requests? msg me here first then add me to msn, [email protected] (e-mail doesn't work so don't e-mail that address)

what is written below is true
--------------------------------
what is written above is a lie
User avatar
koala17
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:06 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Submissive
Dom/me(s): not "owned"

Post by koala17 »

seraph0x wrote:based on completely unfounded prejudice-based superstition I would expect mostly White and Asian people here, because this site is biased towards more introverted personality types right now.
.. yeah, now that I am considering this issue, trying to think it over, I realised that I have seen probably thousands of T&D and femdom pictures and that I can't remember a single one showing, for example, a chastity belted Black man.. this could have some - even scientific - relevance.. :)
Post Reply