Strictly speaking the TVS diode limits voltage, which results in power/current limit, but as an engineer I’m allowed to be pedantic ;) - and I’m curious about a few things you’ve mentioned..mantrid wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:17 pmSorry for the late reply. The Email notification of Milovana seems to be broken.steelhorse545 wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 12:45 am The capacitor addition appears to set a low frequency cutoff (with the assumption that lower frequencies are undesirable) . In practise, the estim authors are a small number of folks -posting here or whose work is in an archive referenced in (Reddit) r/estim , so maybe it’s not a big concern, it’s a safeguard against bad actors. Omitting ie shorting)the capacitor means there’s no frequency twiddling, ie it’s a flat response.
The other feature of his addiction is some diodes to limit the voltage, not a bad idea but I’m not sure the possible failure modes of psu/amplifier warrant it. I had wondered about adding some to the electrode/output side, but without measuring voltages there it’s impossible to specify anything.
Does that make sense ? - feel free to ask :)
Together with the resistor the TVS diode limits the power. Since the the output power of the transformer cant be larger than the input power, it does not matter where the TVS diode is located except that it is easier to tailor it if it is before the transformer. For even better protection you can additional add a (poly)fuse in series to the resistor.
The capacitor also protects the transformer against DC and very low frequency currents which are transformed into heat.
The problem with the low frequencies is whether estim authors are aware of the issue and probably not whether they wanna harm you. For estim devices that re-modulate the audio signals these frequencies are neither dangerous nor unpleasant. There exist estim files that try to cause pain using low frequencies: Its reported that this feels stinging. That's a strong indication that this feeling is not just caused by directly stimulating nerves ...
What’s your primary design intent ? Limit in the case of amplifier(etc) failure, poorly constructed audio file, EMI effects, or something else ? (Obvs diode/clamping voltage choice will depend on which side of the transformer it’s on.)
Audio amplifiers don’t normally/ever have a non-zero quiescent/dc output or are capacitively coupled : otherwise it wastes power, plus since they’re driving loudspeaker coils then having a constant dc drive, if not undesirable for the speaker then it also limits the possible cone excursion.
Back in the dawn of time.. well, valve amplifiers :) class A amplifiers typically have an audio power transformer sitting between anode and the supply rail - there’s always a dc current. Actually, same for transistor amps, I remember drawing load lines for both. I gather there’s an effect called hysteresis distortion - maybe worth considering for audiophiles, but in this application I wonder if it’s worth worrying about.
I guess if you were driving a (linear) amp with something that was pwm- like then there might be a dc offset, whether that’s significant is another matter…but there’s probably going to be capacitive coupling into/within the amp anyway, which I suspect would limit/omit any effect.
Or have I missed something ?










