Just to add my personal opinion on this. I think a "tribute" to anything in whatever domain should mostly be done by referencing, recreating, inserting "easter eggs", involving the original creator, etc. Not by directly using the "tributed" creator's content. It did feel awkward to me as well to see an old Flux scene in there. But that is just my personal opinion.Required wrote:bhlombardy wrote:Well, no it wasn't entirely OBVIOUS apparently... some got it, I didn't. And no, I didn't get to the credits because as I said I stopped watching at that point. I had no idea what was to follow after that round, and since it wasn't obvious (to me) what your intent was -- it completely spoiled the experience.Required wrote: My friend, you totally didn't get the point there. If you pay attention, just before that round begins, the boss say "it's a video perfectly crafted" and "a masterfully creation".
It's OBVIOUSLY a TRIBUTE to those first Vindicare videos. If you would have seen the credits, you would have seen that I thank specially Vindicare for making those videos.
Just to correct, I didn't directly say YOU were lazy... just that the including of that segment made it seem that way. In fact I did give you credit for your efforts on the remainder of the content that I DID watch. But that being said, regardless of your intent, then as my only criticism of a style-choice (and less accusatory as I came off before) -- I still don't think that round fits well with the rest of the video. It would be like U2 putting out an album and sticking a Beatles tune (as recorded by The Beatles) on say track three of their album. While some might get the artistic reasoning for it, it's out of place and should be understood (even by the artist) that not everyone will "get it" necessarily. Doesn't mean the band is "lazy" for their work on the rest of the album but that the inclusion of someone else's work to fill in time seemed to be so.Required wrote: Plus, you go and say that I'm "lazy", after making a 2h video, with 19 rounds completely new, and an tribute one, with LOTS of cutscenes, with more than 120 text lines, a story, and a nice ending...
I find your comment completely ignorant and disrespectful. Have a nice day.
Incidentally, an "homage" is usually a bit more subtle... such as comment regarding it... or glimmer of it in the background of the episode leading up to it or some such. But I digress...
I knew I was going to get flack back from my words (and I predicted as much). No comment of criticism goes by without some bruised feelings of hurt and misunderstanding. I apologize for misinterpreting your intentions with your use of that segment... it wasn't as obvious to me as it was to others. As I said, I enjoyed the first elements of the video, and the previous installment -- and based on your comment now, I have full intention of returning and enjoying the remainder of the video.
Thanks for clearing it up.
I understand you. But you can't make such a review if you haven't watch the WHOLE thing.
You say that the scene doesn't fit with the rest of the video. Let me explain it to you:
That video doesn't fit on purpouse. In the story, it's a video that the boss make you watch. It's the ONLY video, in the whole episode, which is made by a character. So, If you want to show a video, that is made by a character of your story, it HAS TO BE different. Of course it doesn't fit. It should not fit. It must be different to the rest of the scenes. If the video is similar to the rest of the scenes, then that video is not special.
It's like U2, introducing what they believe is an awesome song, and then placing a Beatles song.
And where is the best point to make a tribute to another creator? A video that has to be different? Or a video that should keep a similar layout with the rest of the scenes?
That's why that scene doesn't fit....but totally fits.
And yes, dude...It's quite obvious that it's a tribute. I'm sorry if you didn't get that...but it's quite obvious. If I wanted to steal, I wouldn't have thank vindicare in the credits, and wouldn't keep the layout of that old video.
I don't think your comment was hurting, but I do think it was ignorant. You didn't get an obvious tribute, so I can't take you review very seriously. Sorry If I'm being rude, man, but you said I was stealing someone else's work...and that's not nice.
But what I do think is of really high importance in this case is: did you ask permission before using the content? If the answer is yes then it is legit. Possibly awkward to some of us but legit. If the answer is no, then it is theft, however you put it, tribute or not.


