Can you cum just looking at a video?

[jackstock]

what kind of video does it take?
How long in denial before you can blow just looking at a video?

[quadripalz]

[blondie88]

I love listening to the hands free orgasm audio files on Gone Wild Audio, but it has never actually worked for me. I think added visual stimulation would be needed to push me over the edge. Would love to see someone try a hands free video someday with the aim of ramping up the video so much that eventually it would make you spill without touching... Would be awesome...

[odon]

blondie88: there are a few JOI videos where the viewer is not allowed to touch with their hands. Personally, I haven't found these to be very sexy or effective, but if they work for you, then great.


http://xhamster.com/movies/2214659/no_h ... ._joi.html
http://xhamster.com/movies/1877293/joi_ ... ching.html
http://xhamster.com/movies/2258745/no_h ... ._joi.html

Odon

[servufon]

i've gone a couple+ full months of denial, never happened just via video

have cum by mildly rubbing fabric, not intentionally sexually/sensually, with fantasy thoughts in head, but very rarely

i could imagine cumming in the barefeet right in front of one scenario, but i think for that to happen it would include the friction of getting hard against what i was wearing

[book_guy]

Not from looking, for me. But from hearing? Closer. Still not there.

I enjoy the hands-free orgasm erotic hypnosis genre. I have never actually achieved the full experience of ejaculation that way, although I have experienced (as many young males have) the hands-free orgasm of a "wet dream," which is simply the psychological equivalent of hypnosis but perpetrated by your own sleeping brain (rather than by a recording of a hypnotic induction and then of reaction suggestions and instructions all spoken by a sexy female voice). If you've had a wet dream, then you know what's going on.

I kind of really wish that I could experience the full magilla ejaculation-type orgasm from erotic hypnosis. I think that would be way enjoyable for a lot of reasons, and would also be a new frontier in mind-over-matter brain work for me. Some people say that there is a skill involved, in which you have to learn how to respond properly to a particular mistress and her style of commands. I don't know whether that is the case or not. I did the things recommended by some of the mistresses but never got much farther than my initial reactions to any one recording. I can experience a very familiar pre-orgasmic burn or itch which is rather intense, mostly (almost entirely) in the head of my dick. I can experience the leaking of a LOT of pre-cum, and I can also experience twitches and jerks of certain very tiny, generally inaccessible, muscles that feel like involuntary movements. Otherwise, I have not experienced anything more than that.

In fact, as I get to know an individual recording better and better, it seems to work less rather than more. Over time, any recording will tend to have less rather than more effect on me. I am also finding that to be the case with individual mistresses too -- as their "tricks" become "old hat" to me, I develop a lesser rather than a greater ability to respond. So the idea that one should "practice" his ero-hypno responses, is kind of a catch-22, at least for me.

It's not entirely a question of resistance or will-power. It's also just whether or not there is a surprise factor. If I'm listening to a recording which might or might not give the command to orgasm at the next moment, but which I do not KNOW will give the command, I am mentally required to be on-edge as much as possible. Whereas, to the contrary, if I know that the next five minutes will be a tease without an orgasm command, merely because I remember that fact from having listened to the recording several times already, then I will be unlikely to feel closer to the edge; furthermore, again if I am familiar with the recording through past occasions of listening to it, if I know that the next moment will be the orgasm command, I am unlikely to have boosted my pre-orgasm state to one in which orgasm is closer and closer to potential, because I was not actually listening to and heeding the commands which instructed me to rise to pre-orgasm potential during the hearing of those commands, precisely because I was instead realizing and hoping that the orgasm command would soon arrive. If I know the cum is coming, I am busy ignoring what's going on in the present, yet that is exactly what I must heed in order to enable the cum; whereas, if I know the cum is NOT coming, I am busy ignoring what's going on in the present, BECAUSE I know it won't be for the cum. If you know the tape too well, then it automatically ruins the tape, basically, is what I'm saying.

What might work, to alleviate some of those problems, would be a PROGRAM or game which ran several on-and-off teases and then made you pop at approximately item six, seven, or eight, with the lead-up being varied for each listening session. Like, about twenty different but very similar MP3 files which were shuffled appropriately by your computer play-back device, each melting into the next seamlessly, each representing only a portion of the full tape, and combined they create build-and-release patterns to the tension, but do NOT give the orgasm command at exactly the same time-index or after exactly the same previous instructions. So you could play along, but not know what was coming next. Thus you could figure out how to acquiesce to the mistress and her particular type of verbal instruction. I can't imagine why the mistresses haven't tried to fulfill that market. The shuffle program on most playback software could easily be used for that function.

Example: in five-minute increments, go like this: A -- standardized introduction; B -- standardized first phase of induction; C -- any of six middle-phases of induction; D -- any other of six middle-phases of induction; E -- any of seven end-phases of induction; F -- any other of the seven end-phases of induction; G -- any one of ten first-phases of stimulation; H -- any second one of the ten first-phases of stimulation; I -- any one of four second-phases of stimulation; J -- any other of the four second-phases of stimulation; K -- any third one of the ten first-phases of stimulation; K -- ... and so on, to W -- any random one of pre-orgasm commands, indistinguishable from F, G, H .. J above; X -- the orgasm stimulus; Y -- any one of five first-phase wind-down phases ... etc.. Isn't this a simple concept? If programmed such that the lengths of the individual units did not match exactly, such that many of the interior portions of any one unit sounded indistinguishable from one another, and such that the eventual arrival of the finishing moment therefore was not predictable, was not heralded by great fanfare, but was indeed subject to random selection in the playback device, and was therefore "sprung" on the listener after adequate preparation but without any warning that would ruin it. Wouldn't any simple program for the Windows Media Player suite perform it, if all the MP3 files (including many that would not be played during any one 45-minute session) were already present on the hard drive? You could even pick your total. "Dear program, I want seven to ten total phases before orgasm -- don't tell me how many! -- but I don't have time for the full three-hour experience tonight, I'm going out drinking ..." Geez. Obvious shit no? I can't imagine that it would be that difficult. I've toyed with the idea of snipping portions of sound-files out of their original context and mush-moshing them back together in exactly that manner, but I don't know how to program a shuffle function on the playback so that it does what I need.

Also, so many of the ero-hypno experiences are about humiliation rather than instruction. Personally, I want sounds which tell me what to do, but which do NOT tell me that I'm a little weakling worm. WTF is with the humiliation thing? I guess the mistresses are gratifying their OWN ego needs in these recordings to some degree? Sure, some people find that type of verbal input to be stimulating; but not ALL people who will be using erotic hypnosis, right? I'm still waiting for more of my end of the market to be better filled.

I haven't ever found a "look at this video for a hands-free orgasm" experience to work well at all. Looking is much more distracting than hearing. Eyes open, and you have a hard time feeling awake-but-out-of-it the way hypnosis requires. Eyes closed, and it's a lot easier to fall into trance. You have to keep your eyes OPEN to watch a video. Pity. When you close your eyes and let yourself drop into a hypnotic trance, you are NOT thinking about what the stimuli are, that you are receiving. Instead, you are simply allowing those stimuli to stimulate you. But when you are trying to drop into a hypnotic trance while watching actual acts of sexyness taking place on a screen, you ARE most likely thinking ABOUT the visual stimuli, rather than simply responding to how stimulating they are. Maybe some special types of hypnotic imagery -- fuzzy pictures, optical illusions, blinky lights, etc. -- might be more effective at that? I haven't ever seen one of those. Only "traditional" porn or "virtual sex" style POV images that purport to be able to cause hands-free orgasm.

Anyway, long discussion. Let us know if it works for you. Look up erotic hypnosis, there is plenty of info all over the internet. Check out some of the instructions to HOW to learn to be a good slave, as posted by some of the mistresses. If you want to be their slave, that is ...

about 2 years ago I came in my pants when my female cousin put her bare feet on the table in front of me. I had been in denial for about 1 month and within 1 minute of her putting her feet up (her soles were facing me), I just exploded in my pants with zero physical stimulation whatsoever. You feel so powerless when your in that situation and no matter how strong your will power is, being that horny can tip you over the edge without you wanting it to.

So to answer the question, I would say a video that makes you extremely horny, as well as a denial period of greater than one month In my opinion

Yeah good point about denial. I think you mean, when you say "I had been in denial," that your personal regimen (as instructed by a mistress, probably?) was that you were to remain in ORGASM-denial, right? You don't mean, "Well, I didn't want to admit that I was finding my cousin attractive, I was in denial about that fact ..." Har ...

[quadripalz]

about 2 years ago I came in my pants when my female cousin put her bare feet on the table in front of me. I had been in denial for about 1 month and within 1 minute of her putting her feet up (her soles were facing me), I just exploded in my pants with zero physical stimulation whatsoever. You feel so powerless when your in that situation and no matter how strong your will power is, being that horny can tip you over the edge without you wanting it to.

So to answer the question, I would say a video that makes you extremely horny, as well as a denial period of greater than one month In my opinion

Yeah good point about denial. I think you mean, when you say "I had been in denial," that your personal regimen (as instructed by a mistress, probably?) was that you were to remain in ORGASM-denial, right? You don't mean, "Well, I didn't want to admit that I was finding my cousin attractive, I was in denial about that fact ..." Har ...

Yes I was supposed to remain in orgasm denial, it was a personal challenge to go 2 months without cumming, but it didn't come to fruition. I do find my cousin attractive , even though she's 12 years older than me. Since I also have a huge foot fetish, it made it near impossible for me to stop myself from exploding in my pants. I was disappointed and satisfied at the same time.

[simpso]

Ive managed it before.
I can do hands free with just my mind though ( sexy thoughts )
Have only ever managed it once with my eyes open and watchign a video though.
I basically watched a handjob compilation and imagined all teh cocks being stroked were mine and 'felt' the sensations of what i was watching. - if that makes sense?

And boom - Amazing orgasm.

heres a vid of me cumming hands free.
http://xhamster.com/movies/1936626/comp ... mshot.html

[Xudmud]

I've gotten close, especially with erotic hypnosis... Problem is it's hard to slip into trance when you're ADD and your attention wanders away from focusing on the mistress's voice. Nikki Fatale and (old style) Isabella Valentine have been most effective.

Haven't really tried it with videos, probably looking in the wrong places for ones like that. If Empornium ever opens registration again I may give that a shot.