I understand the move, but I don't approve of the method.
For example, lets say you're 18-24 years old, and live with parents. What if they didn't feel the need to have pornography? That effects privacy for people. It's not a case of the older recipients don't want access to porn, but rather it might be worded in ways to make porn seem like a bad thing. With a lot of these people lacking computer literacy, it might not effect them, but the change would effect their children, considering the fact that almost all the porn sourced now is available on the Internet, and less so from magazines and other subscription services.
I think that Internet monitoring should come as a part of parenting. As society evolves, you must naturally prepare your child for the big bad world. 20 or so years ago it would be a case of "keep all the naughty stuff on the top shelve, and out of the way of children". This day and age it's using filters such as K9 Web Protection, or ISP customised filtering for example.
If you have a child in this day and age, they will inevitably have access to the Internet, parents should know this, and already have the sense to take actions that prevent exposure from this content. The fact this movement is being introduced as government policy aimed at cracking down on paedophillia kind of sickens me.
Then there is one more variable I'd like to introduce...
- You have children, but still want access to pornographic sites.
This filter idea would be so universal, that if you block porn for your children, you've blocked it for yourself too. And I'm sure that all the naturally healthy humans out there would like to keep access to that content in moderation.
Seriously, if you own a computer, you should at least know how to protect you and your family from porn
/rant