The other day my fiance and I watched some porn just to mess around a bit. She questioned why all the guys were pulling out, jerking off and unloading on the girls face in the end. I never really got that either. Even when I was hormone crazed teenager looking for any porn I could get my hands on it seemed odd. From the looks of it very little has changed in the porn industry the past decade.
We both thought it was weird since porn is mostly directed to men and why would you want to see another guy jerk off when you're doing the same. Also when you're with a girl why are you jerking yourself off anyways?
That night we tried pulling out and doing the moneyshot and in the end it really didn't enhance anything and just left more of a mess.
I understand that porn doesn't depict real sex but I just never got that. In terms of porn since it's mostly directed to men why not have the girl complete the deed with her hand or mouth. Especially POV style that way you can fantasize that she's the one jerking and blow you over the edge. I suppose there just might be a lot of people out there who like it the way it is.
Thanks and have a good one
What's with the moneyshot?
- Dude Man
- Explorer

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:39 am
- Gender: Male
- Sexual Orientation: Straight
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: What's with the moneyshot?
Completely agree, I have also wondered this. I can't stand that kind of porn, much prefer the POV style.
Re: What's with the moneyshot?
I've always thought that the "money shot" was just to show the viewer that the guy was really turned on enough to cum. It's pro-forma, and a silly convention, I agree, since it makes the video even less realistic than it would be otherwise (which is saying a lot).
-
dr_cunning
- Explorer

- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:46 pm
Re: What's with the moneyshot?
Well yes it's obviously to actually SHOW the cum, as some sort of "proof" or conclusion.
But the bigger mystery is why the guy always has to jerk it out himself... and why does it always have to be face? Wouldn't the woman stroking the cum onto her boobs be better for all involved?
However, the answer to that last question might be "no." As Milovanians, we are generally predispositioned to appreciate a dominant female with a male submissive. I don't think that puts us in the majority...
Whenever I occasionally play the aggressive male Dom role, it nearly always ends with me jerking out the money shot onto her face. It seems like a completely natural and appropriately degrading thing for me to do, when I'm playing the part. So, perhaps, given that most porn is playing to a more "typical" male audience than the standard Milovana reader, it IS a very natural conclusion to a porn scene. Thoughts?
But the bigger mystery is why the guy always has to jerk it out himself... and why does it always have to be face? Wouldn't the woman stroking the cum onto her boobs be better for all involved?
However, the answer to that last question might be "no." As Milovanians, we are generally predispositioned to appreciate a dominant female with a male submissive. I don't think that puts us in the majority...
Whenever I occasionally play the aggressive male Dom role, it nearly always ends with me jerking out the money shot onto her face. It seems like a completely natural and appropriately degrading thing for me to do, when I'm playing the part. So, perhaps, given that most porn is playing to a more "typical" male audience than the standard Milovana reader, it IS a very natural conclusion to a porn scene. Thoughts?
Re: What's with the moneyshot?
As dr_cunning mentions the prevalence of the money shot has to do with male domination. But the origins of the money shot stem from the "need" early producers had, of showing that the guy really had an orgasm, and that this event was very exciting and enjoyable for the girl. The way to show both was for the guy to ejaculate on the hyper-excited girl.
In addition, the act is somewhat kinky and that probably adds to the excitement of more than one viewer.
In addition, the act is somewhat kinky and that probably adds to the excitement of more than one viewer.
-
Xaphran
- Explorer

- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Sexual Orientation: Straight
Re: What's with the moneyshot?
What I heard was (accurate or not, could be totally bogus or just old since I must have heard it 10+ years ago) a lot of dudes that work in the industry for a while and basically trained themselves not to cum too soon now can't cum very easily unless they do it themselves. Also you've only got one chance for the scene and you don't want to mess up the shot, so that also leads to the manual ending.
Because yes, they feel this need to show it. Hell, in too many vids it's even to the point that when a women takes a load in their mouth they have to show their mouth full for a prolonged period, swallow, then display their empty mouth like either we don't understand the concept of swallowing or that we're trying to veryify they're not pulling a fast one on us. I'm not an IRS agent, I don't need to audit her swallows. It makes the entire process as unsexy as possible.
Also there's the real world reality that even if they are on protection, I suppose a lot of girls (or companies) don't want to push their luck with full loads every time. Possibly why the "cream pies" are a considered a special category.
Personally, I prefer when the woman finishes the guy off with her hands, mouth, or tits, etc, instead of the guy doing it himself. But I also tend to prefer tit shots to facials, so what do I know? I'm clearly not in their prime demographic of preferences.
Because yes, they feel this need to show it. Hell, in too many vids it's even to the point that when a women takes a load in their mouth they have to show their mouth full for a prolonged period, swallow, then display their empty mouth like either we don't understand the concept of swallowing or that we're trying to veryify they're not pulling a fast one on us. I'm not an IRS agent, I don't need to audit her swallows. It makes the entire process as unsexy as possible.
Also there's the real world reality that even if they are on protection, I suppose a lot of girls (or companies) don't want to push their luck with full loads every time. Possibly why the "cream pies" are a considered a special category.
Personally, I prefer when the woman finishes the guy off with her hands, mouth, or tits, etc, instead of the guy doing it himself. But I also tend to prefer tit shots to facials, so what do I know? I'm clearly not in their prime demographic of preferences.
- Sett
- Explorer At Heart

- Posts: 151
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:18 pm
- Gender: Male
- Sexual Orientation: Straight
- I am a: Switch
Re: What's with the moneyshot?
I actually quite like it.
Like swallowing, it shows that she doesn't loathe it and it puts her in very submissive position.
Or it shows that she does loathe it, which, too, pleases my sadistic fantasy.
Like swallowing, it shows that she doesn't loathe it and it puts her in very submissive position.
Or it shows that she does loathe it, which, too, pleases my sadistic fantasy.
