bondageslave36 wrote:I agree with a lot of that. The only thing I don't agree with is taking some of the "Toy" tags off of the list. If we are going to seperate them between the three categories (Fetishes, Toys, and Descriptions), we should be able to be redundant from category to category. I don't believe things like "candle" and "enema kit" should be removed from the toy list. If we are going to seperate and categorize the tags, people might look strictly at the "Toys" category in order to make sure they have everything they need. If you are going to allow people to just breeze by the site and not register, they aren't going to know to check the "Fetish" tag category in order to gather supplies.
This made me think. Clearly I don't like redundancy. You shouldn't need to add hot-wax
and candles as an author. On the other hand, bondageslave has a point saying that the list of toys should be complete.
My first idea was to make one tag imply the other one. So that if hot-wax is set, candles are implied. But after all, this is not always the case. For all we now the tease might just be about the
fantasy of waxing,
Long story short: Yes, you're right, we should have both hot-wax and candles.
Sidenote: At my regular job there is currently a special situation that will pretty keep me on my toes for the upcoming week. So don't expect any new features during that time. (The server change will still take place as planned though.)
dark wrote:Agree bondageslave36. This is already planned, but until this feature is implemented i ask all users to be careful about their tags. Seraph0x already works on an internal edit feature for team members. So when this is finished the team can fix the spoilers or spamcomments.
Yes, dark said everything.
bondageslave36 wrote:As I am for tagging things to tell you some of the content that the teases contain, I am not for spoiling the ending of the teases for people. I think it is assumed that you may or may not get to cum. That is the true essence of a webtease. You said the tease you saw had a "deny" tag on it. What if we were to make up a list of banned tags. On that list would be words that reveal the ending "deny", "get to cum". We would pretty much ban anything that gives away the ending to a tease. Doing this kind of thing is an administrators nightmare, but it is the only other thing I can think to do if we aren't going to have a set list of tags. I don't like that idea because anybody can add a tag. Who is to stop them from adding the word "denial" to a tease? If we were to have automatic removal of these tags, that would be way too much work and it would not be practical. Again, an administrators nightmare.
We could easily add denial and other tags as aliases to deny, so that the software automatically replaces them when they come up.
Still, you are right that spoilers are an issue. How about this: You can select to hide all non-special (i.e. user-invented) tags. They would then only be used for searching and filtering. On the other hand, if we do this, we might aswell return to a set list of tags.
Hmm, it is tricky indeed.