Feedback for The Man Trap, part 2

[submatt]

I wanted to do something with a real twist, and this certainly is that. I still think she's really hot, though.

[real-webjunky]

hi,

i think she looks beautiful and enjoyed the first part.
second part shows - it really is a double trap.
- being taken into marriage in the story
- being taken into underage real (?) ... :(
i'm not so happy about last thing.

kind regards, webjunky

[Quazwierdcev283]

strange that this one seemed to bug people more than the kissing cave. Maybe because the kissing cave didn't have any sex (as far as I remember). I enjoyed both parts of your tease. I sort of ignored the part she was 17 so yeah I guess it bugged me a little. But keep up the good work. By the way, are you still planning on making sequels to your clinic tease? I saw one sequel put up but it was gone the next day. Why'd you take it down?

[Marke]

Great tease - and different laws different countries.

But the important thing is the photos are from Abby Wnters and they have firm policies in place - so you can be sure she's not under 18.

I suppose just saying she was pregnant and that you now had to marry her was probably all that was required.

Pregnant women are beautiful and my experince of marriage matches what she has in store for you (a bit).

[ShaunGBD]

Great tease. I love the pregnant part. Can't wait for the third part.

[submatt]

Together Forever, the only sequel so far to Matchmaking Service, is back up. Seraphox just wanted to make sure she was of age, and it took me a long time to track the model down again.

Speaking of age, of course the model in this one is of age. I wouldn't dream of putting myself or this site in jeopardy by posting pictures that were underage. And the thought of sex with a minor is absolutely repugnant to me. Often models that are of age look too young, and I can't look at them, either. Like Trixie Teen - ick.

But I like the idea of a person being blackmailed for something they thought was okay to do, not to mention their own horny desires getting them into trouble. So, I figured the underage idea was better than say, rape. And sexier than stealing or something like that.

[submissivemaletx]

The only thing that really bugged me was that just about all the pics were zoomed in on her face or belly or tits. I thought it would have been more enjoyable had we could see her top half or whole as opposed to a close up of something.

[MagicTease2]

Speaking of age, of course the model in this one is of age. I wouldn't dream of putting myself or this site in jeopardy by posting pictures that were underage. And the thought of sex with a minor is absolutely repugnant to me. Often models that are of age look too young, and I can't look at them, either. Like Trixie Teen - ick.

Under the new US PROTECT law, even pictures of an 18+ model are considered illegal if they are accompanied by text (or anything else)encouraging the reader to believe or pretend that she's underage. It's called "pandered material" - essentially so that sites couldn't legally profit from paedophiles by selling them pictures of young-looking-but-18+ models advertised as "Sexy schoolgirls" or something similar:

“[Any person who] knowingly…advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits through the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material or purported material is, or contains-- an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.”

I didn't see this material myself, but I did speak to someone on Second Life who did see it who has now apparantly blocked and "reported" milovana.com (he didn't say who to) :(

[submatt]

Well, I honestly didn't think anybody would think she really was underage, but perhaps I'll add a disclaimer.

[submatt]

Seraphox,

If this is a problem, let me know. I'll take it down or change it or whatever.

[MagicTease2]

Well, I honestly didn't think anybody would think she really was underage, but perhaps I'll add a disclaimer.

This is the problem, under the "pandering" law it doesn't matter. If you're _telling_ people those pictures are of an underage girl teasing them - with the intent they'll make-believe that she is as part of a sexual fantasy - then that's enough to make it "pandered material", even if the pictures actually show a 70-year-old grandmother knitting a scarf! This law is controversial, and I think there's a legal challenge in progress now, but it is still in progress, not definitively changed yet. And since by breaking this law the material becomes child pornography, it's illegal to download it, not just to host it - so the fact that Milovana isn't in the US doesn't help, as US users who view it (and those in some other countries) could still be in trouble. (In the UK, for example, it may have difficulty with the "pseudo-photographs" rule.)

I have no idea if the site actually WAS reported or not, by the way - the person also seemed to believe that submatt was "an administrator" because he has a custom forum graphic and was able to write Flash teases(?)

[submatt]

The offending sentence has been removed. My apologies to anyone who was offended. It was unintentional, I assure you.

[Makarov]

And now for the only remaining offense in the tease...the preggers woman! What is a pregnant woman aside from a woman that's temporarily fat?

*Makarov grants his apologies for any pregnant women, men who have to put up with pregnant women, and fat women that stayed fat after pregnancy*