Hmm, now what?

Princess Raquel · Post by **Princess Raquel** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:25 pm

I have been getting some messages about new teases. I figured here would be the best way to reply to them all. First off I have ideas and would love to exploit them on to you all. Second, I have been busy with family and the holidays and such. But now from what I am seeing, some of the teases have changed, and I wouldn't know where to begin with the format. I may just stick with the regular tease format if I can. However, if someone wishes to help me through the new process, I may have a special treat for them. Meanwhile, I have some free time so be on the look out for something new.

Princess

happyclamm · Post by **happyclamm** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:05 pm

I stongly encourage you to use the traditional format. The "bugs" aren't ironed out of the new format yet.

Evals · Post by **Evals** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:41 pm

happyclamm wrote:I stongly encourage you to use the traditional format. The "bugs" aren't ironed out of the new format yet.

They aren't bugs within the flash tease editor, it's just that you're dissatisfied with people's use of what it's capable of doing.

It is a bit daunting at first glance, but one you dive in it's not that bad.

Too bad there's not a guide yet.

happyclamm · Post by **happyclamm** » Sat Dec 29, 2007 10:43 pm

Evals wrote:
happyclamm wrote:I stongly encourage you to use the traditional format. The "bugs" aren't ironed out of the new format yet.
They aren't bugs within the flash tease editor, it's just that you're dissatisfied with people's use of what it's capable of doing. It is a bit daunting at first glance, but one you dive in it's not that bad. Too bad there's not a guide yet.

Who said anything about bugs in the flash tease editor? I said the bugs aren't ironed out of the new format yet.

Every flash tease I've seen on the internet face the same challenges...and they all pretty much fall short of the good old fashioned "regular" web tease.

Perhaps one of the geniuses who pick at my statements will figure out how to consistently make GOOD flash teases.

Then we can all stop obsessing and nitpicking about what our perceptions tell us.

BTW submatt's "12 Days of Mistress" is one of the best flash teases I've ever seen. Good work!

Evals · Post by **Evals** » Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:14 am

happyclamm wrote:
Evals wrote:
happyclamm wrote:I stongly encourage you to use the traditional format. The "bugs" aren't ironed out of the new format yet.
They aren't bugs within the flash tease editor, it's just that you're dissatisfied with people's use of what it's capable of doing. It is a bit daunting at first glance, but one you dive in it's not that bad. Too bad there's not a guide yet.
Who said anything about bugs in the flash tease editor? I said the bugs aren't ironed out of the new format yet.

Every flash tease I've seen on the internet face the same challenges...and they all pretty much fall short of the good old fashioned "regular" web tease.

They aren't ironed out in the new format yet?

Give some examples of bugs that seraph0x needs "iron out" before you'd suggest she should consider making a flash tease. From what I've seen, all your complaints come from what you consider to be the poor quality of flash teases, not their technical limitations induced by bugs.

Post by **dark** » Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:08 am

Ok guys we already have a thread for this discussion. She wants to know your opinions about the next tease of her and you are fighting. Naughty boys

princessraquel84, the new tease format is not required to make a good webtease. As far as I remember you are using your own pictures for a tease. This is really enough to create a special webtease. I liked your first tease a lot. If you don't need some new features (e.g. timing, multiple choice) you can use the standard editor.

But if you want to use the new flash editor I would be glad to help you. You can chat me in MSN (see profile). I think you could find a lot of guys here who are willing to serv... ehm help you

Evals · Post by **Evals** » Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:58 am

Sorry Dark and Princess Raquel.

It's so easy.

But really, you'd be just as good doing it as a conventional tease. Dark is right, the draw of your teases comes from the fact you use your own pictures. If you want to give it a little more bang on top of all of it that it'll already have, you can go for a flash tease, but it'd be a lot more work.

Marke · Post by **Marke** » Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:17 pm

Princess Raquel, I just love your teases ... they are very special. If there is anything I can do to help, just PM me.

I think there is a lot of potential for teases that require other online activity, such as emails etc. Especially if there was a way of locking that into future episodes.

submissivemaletx · Post by **submissivemaletx** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:06 am

It appears as though she has deleted both her teases. Glad I got to see them before that happened. I hope she comes back.

Marke · Post by **Marke** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:03 am

Reading Princess Raquel's opening post again tells me that she's busy, but has lots of ideas on how to exploit us ... so have faith that when she has some spare time a revamped set of teases may appear.

rbtheservant · Post by **rbtheservant** » Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:59 pm

Dearest Princess Raquel,

I personally would be most grateful to see you create a Flash Tease of your divine beauty and ability to control all worthless males.

I humbly beg you to please create a Flash Tease.

RB the servant.

Hmm, now what?

Hmm, now what?

Re: Hmm, now what?