Women: do you read teases meant for guys ?

[Human]

Women: do you read teases meant for guys ?

Guys: do you enjoy teases meant for women ?

Or is Milovana a gay site; with guys pleasing guys and girls pleasing girls ?

[Human]

Isnt gay the proper vernacular ??
AFAIK gay=homosexual with no negative connotations; "fag" is the offensive term.

Oh, and I didnt use gay offensively.

[ismara]

I do enjoy teases meant for women. Feminization is probably my favorite theme, and doing a tease made for actual women can be an effective experience of that fantasy, although it requires more imagination and a bit of creativity with instructions :)

[AngelAnna837]

I have read and done quite alot of the teases for guys, purly becuase there are no female versions ;p

I have to say that my favorites have to be Incubo's Bermuda teases which are all awesome :D but there are alot more i have read thought and "done" with slight adapataions.

They aslo give me idea for when i am writting teases for guys too :)


Anna

[Lady X]

Women: do you read teases meant for guys ?

Guys: do you enjoy teases meant for women ?

Or is Milovana a gay site; with guys pleasing guys and girls pleasing girls ?

Okay...........My five cents worth..............

First..... as a women, yes I read teases "meant for guys", since that is the way you put it, and I read teases "meant for girls".

Okay, look out, I'm fxin to rant.

I believe Indy was correct in speaking out about the gay thing. Did you put gay people down? No. But why say that? There isn't Women, Men and Gay people. Why single them out. It's a lifestyle choice, not a gender!

Rant two:
Why would there need to be a classification of "meant for" needed.
So, if I write a tease, that speaks of cocks and balls, that means that that My tease is "meant for" only guys? Why?

A creative woman can do one of two things. She can read the tease and substitute this and that and enjoy the hell out of the tease. Or, a woman can read that same tease and simply enjoy the hell out of reading what is being suggested for a male to do.
And the same can be said for the male reading teases that speak of female parts.

*steps down off My soapbox...takes a breath...smiles sweetly and moves along*

[Incubo]

I certainly read both. Mostly because I enjoy a good story. It's not really about the "tease" for me. In fact, I don't actually "do" the teases anyway. I'm not a sub and I just don't really take kindly to following instructions. I FAR prefer to give them.

Still I do enjoy reading them. It's more of an intellectual exercise for me. Reading through other people's teases gives me ideas. Whether it was meant for guys or girls doesn't matter.

[tBone]

I could be entirely wrong, but Im sure he wasnt using gay as in "Your mother is gay!" but as "Bob is gay, he only likes men" except, instead of men, its teases meant for men. And women would only read(like) teases for women(other women).

AFAIK, he is using it correctly.

[Human]

I could be entirely wrong, but Im sure he wasnt using gay as in "Your mother is gay!" but as "Bob is gay,.

Wait, "Your mother is gay!" means something other than "Your mother is a homosexual" ?

[Heathcliff]

A creative woman can do one of two things. She can read the tease and substitute this and that and enjoy the hell out of the tease. Or, a woman can read that same tease and simply enjoy the hell out of reading what is being suggested for a male to do.

(Note: for ease of my explanations I'm going to refer to men who are submissive and women who are dominate, as that seems to be the most prevalent paradigm here. However, everyone falls somewhere in between these two extremes so there are going to be obvious exceptions (in action and motivation) to what I say.)

This is a valid point that people often forget. Women who are into dominance could to enjoy it vicariously. (Dominance fantasy via-proxy etc.) But I feel there's a fundamental difference between dominance and submission that would tend to make the submissive enjoy it more then the dominate.

The reason is simple: dominance involves acting on someone, while submission involves being acted upon. (A bit of a simplification, but it works.) It's easier to indulge submission alone then indulge dominance alone. You can (using webteases and such) pretend there's someone there to "force your hand" but I just don't think there's a similarly satisfying solution for dominates.

Just my two cents though, so your mileage may vary.