[Beta]Agentic Lover - The LLM Frontend for Lovers

Webteases are great, but what if you're in the mood for a slightly more immersive experience? Chat about Tease AI and other offline tease software.

Moderator: 1885

kinkylucy
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2025 10:58 pm

Re: [Beta]Agentic Lover - The LLM Frontend for Lovers

Post by kinkylucy »

Chico wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 9:59 am Would it control a Lovense Gush 11 ?

Chico
The updated lovense extension is now compatible with all lovense toys (that i own) so it should work great for the Gush. You use the lovense app to scan the QR code in the extension.
G3General
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:39 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Submissive

Re: [Beta]Agentic Lover - The LLM Frontend for Lovers

Post by G3General »

I went all inn to give it a proper go and the experience is quite positive. Bought 11labs credit, and went supporter on agentic lover.

The overall experience is pretty good. I have tested most of my compatible toys and they work. Here are a couple of notes. Handy2 w/intiface only uses 80% stroke length, but the handy app uses 100%. Lovense app did not work when i tested with Edge 2, but worked with intiface. The estim app also works, but i only tested the sound. Restim app works.

"Lovergirl" could use some work as it dosnt work 100% of the time. "Arousal state" could use some work, it made chat/ai act weird. "Voice input" works most of the time, but sometimes it "disengages" for me and i have to select it again, which is to bad in bondage situations. "Screen share" dosn't work for me. Said something like not available even as supporter tier.

I find the answers given by the ai to be too long as i use default model. Any suggestions on someone with a bit shorter reply?
Also i couldnt figure out how to ass comfyUI to the webapp.

I also downlaoded the actual app, that didnt work very good.

Overall, you got something very nice here i think. With a litte more work it could be a real gem.
kinkylucy
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2025 10:58 pm

Re: [Beta]Agentic Lover - The LLM Frontend for Lovers

Post by kinkylucy »

G3General wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2026 2:18 pm "Lovergirl" could use some work as it dosnt work 100% of the time. "Arousal state" could use some work, it made chat/ai act weird. "Voice input" works most of the time, but sometimes it "disengages" for me and i have to select it again, which is to bad in bondage situations. "Screen share" dosn't work for me. Said something like not available even as supporter tier.
Thanks, this is really valuable, I'm hoping to have all the extensions properly "finished" by the end of the month! So these, especially the lower use things like elevenlabs, will all be properly finished.

There's another TTS extension coming that is _really_ good, but uses local PC/phone power, hopefully inside a week.
I find the answers given by the ai to be too long as i use default model. Any suggestions on someone with a bit shorter reply?
You could adjust the AI's personality to say how she responds. "You prefer sending messages that are short and sharp, 1-2 sentences. Never send long messages.". If that doesn't work, you can force it a bit harder with an extension adding it to the end of the prompt -- but that extension is a little less tested.
Overall, you got something very nice here i think. With a litte more work it could be a real gem.
Thank you! I'm hoping with so much feedback it'll help me finish it up and bring it out of beta. Thanks for supporting!
SuccubiHunterRPG
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:42 pm

Re: [Beta]Agentic Lover - The LLM Frontend for Lovers

Post by SuccubiHunterRPG »

kinkylucy wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2026 1:27 am Yeah, unfortunately it's basically impossible to offer the AI compute itself for free. If you want you can try set up Openrouter and use free models via Openrouter. :) Glad you had fun so far though.
Thanks I got Openrouter working. but my preference is to use my local Ollama server.
You have better things to do than help me solve what is going wrong but I would appreciate knowing if you believe it should be working so I don't waste my time to discover that it is a feature not yet finsihed :-)
Post Reply