PrimalInstincts wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2026 12:48 pm
piper.pepper wrote: Wed Feb 25, 2026 11:03 pm
PrimalInstincts wrote: Thu Jan 29, 2026 8:12 pm
Read the First Post of Mine .
Editing PC Stopped Working .
But I will Fix It as Soon as Possible .
And No , I don´t Release the Results Without The Video .
It is not Dead , Just Delayed .
Sorry… but this is slowly getting ridiculous.
It honestly feels like Milovana is going downhill. We’re almost in March 2026 already, and the main "On Video" page is still talking about “Releases 2025.”
Hey, don’t get me wrong — I absolutely appreciate all the voluntary work you guys put into this. I really do.
I’d just hate to see this forum slowly die simply because no one is actively moderating or maintaining it anymore.
And if a PC hasn’t been fixed in over two months… maybe it’s time to consider getting a new one?
If you need new moderators, maybe open up applications. I’m sure there are plenty of people who’d be willing to help and support the platform.
But the way things are right now… it’s just getting kind of sad.
Slow down a bit , okay .
Firstly , last years Gloden Cock Awards was released on the 26th of February so the same Day as today on Year ago .
Secondly , my PC is fixed , but it will take some time to edit the whole Video ( sorry i can´t let AI do all the work for me ) , because i have other responsebilities that have to do with this Forum , to name it , manage and produce the whole Sofcore Collaboration 6 Video . And that took priority for a time . But now i´am on it .
Thirdly , yes , they are behind a bit for not making the 2026 New Releases , but that give you not the right to take it out on me . You know , most People do this for Fun and have other Life priorities .
Fourthly , i can´t stress this enough but , you make AI Content , nothing against that , but when you think that producing an 3 - 6 Minute AI Video is the same work as making a Video on your own , to name it , come up with an Idea that works , find Content for it , Edit it yourself , you are dead wrong .
Alright. Let’s slow down indeed.
First of all — thank you for the reply. And just to be clear: unlike you, I wasn’t personally attacking anyone. I explicitly said I appreciate the voluntary work being done here. I know very well how much time unpaid moderation and community management takes — I run a Discord server and help manage another forum myself.
My criticism was never “why isn’t your video finished.”
My concern was much broader: why does it feel like nothing is happening — and why is there so little visible communication about it?
That’s a structural concern. Not a personal attack.
What made this personal was your reaction.
Instead of addressing the actual point, you chose to dismiss my work entirely because I create AI-assisted content. Suggesting that I “let AI do all the work” wasn’t a response to my argument — it was a personal dig. And frankly, it came across as immature and unnecessarily diffamating.
And yes — that reply was genuinely uncalled for and objectively unprofessional in tone. It felt unnecessary and, to be blunt, disrespectful.
Let me clarify something important:
I never commented on the quality, difficulty, or legitimacy of your editing process. I didn’t question how much effort your video requires. I didn’t compare workloads in order to devalue your work.
You were the one who turned this into a comparison — and in doing so, chose to invalidate my work based on assumptions about AI production.
And those assumptions show a clear lack of understanding of how that process actually works.
There seems to be this idea that AI content means typing a prompt and receiving a finished video. That is not reality.
The visual source material itself has to be generated through iteration, correction, refinement, and selection. Only after that does the actual post-production begin — editing, compositing, manual adjustments, syncing, rendering, troubleshooting, fine-tuning.
The AI generates assets.
It does not generate a finished product.
And here’s the key point:
In principle, what AI generates becomes the raw material that I then shape — just like others here take existing footage and reshape it.
The difference is only in where the source material comes from — not in whether post-production effort exists.
If we’re being honest about workload and workflow, both approaches involve building on material that originates elsewhere and transforming it through editing and creative decisions.
Reducing that entire process to “letting AI do all the work” is inaccurate and dismissive.
Again, my original comment was about platform stagnation and communication — not about attacking your production process.
If we’re going to criticize each other’s work, it should at least be based on an informed understanding rather than (completely wrong) assumptions.
Because right now, the only thing that feels misplaced is the attempt to invalidate work that clearly hasn’t been properly understood.
Please support me a lil bit 
)
