Would this scripting workaround be 'legal'?

Post all technical issues and questions here. We'll gladly help you wherever we can.
Post Reply
SissyNinaCoco
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:12 pm
Gender: Femboy
Sexual Orientation: Bisexual/Bi-Curious
I am a: Submissive
Dom/me(s): i'm on my own
Location: Southern Germany

Would this scripting workaround be 'legal'?

Post by SissyNinaCoco »

Hi you all! :-)

I have played around with the eos editor a little (working on a tease), and doing so came up with a way to do smooth animations. :whistle:

This is using a lot of jpgs and thus space on the servers i suppose, hence my questions:
  • Would it be bad to use this method in regular teases?
  • Or would the site managers be fine with this? (If one of them reads this ;-) )
Here a link to the demo tease:
https://milovana.com/webteases/showteas ... 10f45f55f5
kerkersklave
Explorer At Heart
Explorer At Heart
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 2:11 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Open to new ideas!
I am a: Slave

Re: Would this scripting workaround be 'legal'?

Post by kerkersklave »

There are already teases that do this. The jpgs are processed after uploading so they are pretty small anyway. There might also be a limit on the numbers of pictures you can have, so you can only do short sequences like that anyway, so I guess it is fine. It is nice for some effects, but in general the quality of animation you get is too bad to use it constantly.
SissyNinaCoco
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:12 pm
Gender: Femboy
Sexual Orientation: Bisexual/Bi-Curious
I am a: Submissive
Dom/me(s): i'm on my own
Location: Southern Germany

Re: Would this scripting workaround be 'legal'?

Post by SissyNinaCoco »

Yeah, i guess You are right about that. It may work smoothly on high-end hardware but be aweful on mobile phones or potatoes...
Post Reply