I vote for Augustulus who WINS.
allinone (0/3) vs Augustulus (3/3)
- Spoiler: show


Really guys 0 votesj3rry wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:59 am I vote for Augustulus who WINS.
allinone (0/3) vs Augustulus (3/3)

I see that allinone is also disappointed. What if voting would be possible for a week instead?

j3rry wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 1:48 am Maybe if voting won't end on 3 votes, she might score something? What do you all think?
I think it will be hectic as sometimes there are lots of duels going on and list can get very long, we could increase the winner count from 3 to 5 maybe??

Wow, I didn't expect you to not get a single vote! I would've voted for you personally


Oh, I find Apolonia quite hot, too, but she sadly can't stand against Milaj3rry wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 1:48 amHow was that even possible? Nobody likes Apolonia? Maybe if voting won't end on 3 votes, she might score something? What do you all think?
What if voting would be possible for a week instead?
That might be a more reasonable idea, though I would hold against it, that in the worst case you need 9 different people voting on a single duel to win. That's already quite a lot and might lead to the game stalling pretty soon.

Augustulus wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:53 am Ongoing duels
The FIRST ever official QUARTET-DUEL in this game:
Theme: favorite pornstar
Augustulus (0/0) vs QuincyGaming (0/0) vs allinone (0/0) vs j3rry (0/0)
- Spoiler: show

Well now that you asked for it, sure..
Yeah, due to limited active playing members it can be hard..Augustulus wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:04 am That might be a more reasonable idea, though I would hold against it, that in the worst case you need 9 different people voting on a single duel to win. That's already quite a lot and might lead to the game stalling pretty soon.
In my opinion we should see how the quartet duel is working out, especially time wise, and evaluate changes afterwards.
As it currently is, there is also an aspect of chance in the game who currently votes to win or lose a duel and I guess this is also a little thrilling, don't you think?

I don't think a tribute would be worth it if nobody sees it, right?
That's worst case 17 different playersallinone wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 1:34 pm Yeah, due to limited active playing members it can be hard..
We could try the winner vote count of 5 with the quadra, a test fight??



Woops, my bad: while voting I thought the 0 target count was a typo, so in my previous post I set it to 3 as usual...Augustulus wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:04 amThat might be a more reasonable idea, though I would hold against it, that in the worst case you need 9 different people voting on a single duel to win. That's already quite a lot and might lead to the game stalling pretty soon.
In my opinion we should see how the quartet duel is working out, especially time wise, and evaluate changes afterwards.
As it currently is, there is also an aspect of chance in the game who currently votes to win or lose a duel and I guess this is also a little thrilling, don't you think?

It was absolutely a typo on my endim_inconclusiv wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:10 pmWoops, my bad: while voting I thought the 0 target count was a typo, so in my previous post I set it to 3 as usual...Augustulus wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:04 amThat might be a more reasonable idea, though I would hold against it, that in the worst case you need 9 different people voting on a single duel to win. That's already quite a lot and might lead to the game stalling pretty soon.
In my opinion we should see how the quartet duel is working out, especially time wise, and evaluate changes afterwards.
As it currently is, there is also an aspect of chance in the game who currently votes to win or lose a duel and I guess this is also a little thrilling, don't you think?![]()
