ma4rty wrote: Sat Sep 14, 2019 1:04 am
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Trap
Literally the first definition. In hentai, or anime or whatever Japanese weeb culture "trap" always means man dressed in female clothes. Considering this is a hentai tease, one would think that they the others will use hentai "language".....
They are both dudes, but one of them wears female clothes. If you are attracted to man, there is no way that this would change it... You are attracted to man, because of the cloaths or of the body? If it is because of the cloaths then you are not really attracted to man...
I think you are just making not needed drama. That's kinda dogshit
Most of the popular Yaoi fanfic's always have "crossdress" tag in them. Like, there won't be a popular one without it. Therefore I said that if it was change(I didn't exactly say that, but that's what I had in mind) then more people would definitely appreciate that.
Just to clarify: Futa has both vagina and penis, not to mention breasts. So that's far away of the "trap" definition
It's kinda dogshit to tell me I'm making drama when I was genuinely asking questions and sharing my experience.
As for "using hentai language", I would hope that one could enjoy a hentai webtease and participate in a discussion thereof without needing to become a regular hentai reader/watcher or an expert in that sublanguage. I would also hope that one would be able to use better sources of definitions than just urban dictionary. In this case, I'm not sure the author shares your understanding of hentai. There are explicit definitions the author gave. EG:
Futanari? Like a strong woman with a big cock? Select this one!
To me, that sounds like the porn-prototypical trans woman. Do you see how I or others might have been confused in your request as the author's definition aligns with how I had heard of 'trap' in reference to trans women? (This definition is supported in a relatively quick google search by Wiktionary where I was familiar with def. 18 but not 19,
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/trap#Noun and GLAAD (down at the bottom of the page)
https://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender, and an interesting thinkpiece on Medium, where the author references reddit and porn as clearly using the word "trap" more in line with my definition than yours
https://medium.com/@musketmisstress/sto ... 2622b89fa2)
Furthermore, the yaoi category was put in by the author for queer guys:
Yaoi? Are you homosexual or bi, or maybe just wanna try it out? Then this is the fethish for you! Having a dildo for this would be ideal!
That doesn't sound a lot to me like it has anything to do with crossdressing. And there are different levels to crossdressing. It can be "just clothes" but it can also be actually presenting as a different gender. And if there's a man I like who's wearing a skirt but otherwise presenting male, then that's different from if he actually presents female from time to time. I don't have a problem with either version of crossdressing (either IRL or in a webtease), but I'm much less likely to be attracted to anyone presenting female. I appreciate any section where there are male-presenting people (and that includes men with vulvas) interacting with each other because there's a lack of it in webteases.
Finally, you explicitly did not answer my question about why you would ask to replace a category instead of just add a category. Let's do a thought experiment. Say, for example, I like handcuff bondage but dislike or am indifferent to rope bondage. There's a webtease with rope bondage but no handcuff bondage. In this hypothetical, I ask the author to get rid of the rope bondage and replace it with handcuff bondage. This doesn't make sense to me, especially if I can say no to a section. Why wouldn't I just ask for handcuff bondage to be added? Why would I take away the enjoyment of those who enjoy rope bondage? Do you see where I find incongruity here?