Tease AI Bug Report Thread

[Daragorn]

So, I found a bug with @RapidCodeOn

mmmm that's a really weird bug....i tested it and indeed it doesn't work....but then i tried it in debug mode to see where the problem lies....and when i run it in debug mode, it works ...that's will be pretty hard to understand why it doesn't when not in debug mode since the code seems to be working fine and have no bugs when checking it line per line...

[avatarbr]

So, I found a bug with @RapidCodeOn

mmmm that's a really weird bug....i tested it and indeed it doesn't work....but then i tried it in debug mode to see where the problem lies....and when i run it in debug mode, it works ...that's will be pretty hard to understand why it doesn't when not in debug mode since the code seems to be working fine and have no bugs when checking it line per line...

Maybe @RapidCodeOn its treating @ContactX like a @NullResponse?

Now that I have a unique Link file calling the real links with @CallReturn, I noticed some line jumps in the real links, and my unique link file have a lot of @RapidCodeOn and @NullResponse.

Its like @RapidCodeOn it's not stoping at the right time when did not found a @NullResponse, because without the @RapidCodeOn, the code works fine.

A side question, did a (something) line stops the @RapidCodeOn?

[Daragorn]

Nope, the code is reading fine and it is doing everything it should be doing... My guess is that it is some problem with the timer... When in debug mode, executing it line by line it works fine and read all lines... When not in debug mode it seems like it adds the contact but then it read the file "too fast" and filter out the line because it is filtering them before realizing the contact was added (which is why it jumps to the end directly)... That's my guess... But it will be hard to tackle this since i cant debug it...

Are you sure about the line skipping in your link file? I never had a line jump while in rapidcode honestly (how can you be sure of the line jumps if you have nullresponse lines?)

[avatarbr]

Are you sure about the line skipping in your link file? I never had a line jump while in rapidcode honestly (how can you be sure of the line jumps if you have nullresponse lines?)

The jumped lines are on the "normal"link files. I know because I know what was skiped (what sucks for me ). But I think I can fix that with a @RapidCodOff before calling the files.

And about that, sometimes I still got a skip Stop stroking after hold the edge. Not sure if could be related. I remember some time ago, someone said there was a really long hold the edge in HoT, and I think he just got a skiped line to stop.

Another small thing, looks like @MultipleEdges always use #Stop, but the last one use #StopStroking, what is a "small spoiler" for who know the lines (I always know when is the last edge on a @MultipleEdge). Could be ramdom, or use the same vocabulary for every edge on the @MultipleEdges?


EDIT: Just remember another thing. Not really a bug, but messed with what I want to do.

if a response file have only @flags() on the responses, if you dont have any of those flags and type that response, a error line appear:

Ex:
[I cant handle, bla bla, bla bla]
[not stroking]
@flags(01)
@flags(02)
[not stroking end]

If you type "I cant handle" in a not stroking part, and dont have flags 01 or 02, a error line will appear. I could put a @NullResponse in the response file, but this would make a 50/50 to use the flag line, right? (I still can use a @NotFlag(01,02), but will force me to always remember to update that line when I add a new flag)

Would be possible to TeaseAI just ignore the response if none lines are available without flags, like if that part is blank?

[Daragorn]

Are you sure about the line skipping in your link file? I never had a line jump while in rapidcode honestly (how can you be sure of the line jumps if you have nullresponse lines?)

can you give me examples of the lines that are skipped? because i never had such a problem and i honestly wouldn't even know where to start to look at a potential bug.
The one with the @contact, i fixed it...it was as i expected, due to the timers that were used to put the contact in or out of the chat...their tick was happening too slow and, thus the whole file was filtered because the program wasn't aware that the contact was already in...i removed the timers since i had already changed the way contacts enter/exit and they were not needed anymore.
So it might be possible that there are other problems with timers and rapidcode...but i need to know what triggers it to try to find it....because, as i said, i never noticed any line skipping (unless it was to be filtered out due to flags/if/variables check)

And about that, sometimes I still got a skip Stop stroking after hold the edge. Not sure if could be related. I remember some time ago, someone said there was a really long hold the edge in HoT, and I think he just got a skiped line to stop.

as before...i never had any problem with that in my sessions...so if you can find how to reproduce it reliably and tell me how to do that, i can try to see where the problem lies, otherwise it is impossible

Another small thing, looks like @MultipleEdges always use #Stop, but the last one use #StopStroking, what is a "small spoiler" for who know the lines (I always know when is the last edge on a @MultipleEdge). Could be ramdom, or use the same vocabulary for every edge on the @MultipleEdges?

Actually the vocab used when stopping edges is #StopStrokingEdge, not #Stop
The vocab used while doing multipleedges (apart for the last one), instead is #SYS_MultipleEdgesStop. You can modify them to suit your needs as you prefer...there is no need to change the code for that, just change those files as you prefer if you don't want the "spoiler"

[avatarbr]

Actually the vocab used when stopping edges is #StopStrokingEdge, not #Stop
The vocab used while doing multipleedges (apart for the last one), instead is #SYS_MultipleEdgesStop. You can modify them to suit your needs as you prefer...there is no need to change the code for that, just change those files as you prefer if you don't want the "spoiler"

Next time I have that with a Link, I will post here. I cant find the last one (I dont remember when happened and there is a lot of logs to find. Next time I will spam the chat with @ to be clear :D)

The edge one, I cant really tell when happens. It's rare, and I dont think there is a special case to appear. :(

And thanks for the #Vocab for the @multipleedges...I will change that

[Daragorn]

Actually the vocab used when stopping edges is #StopStrokingEdge, not #Stop
The vocab used while doing multipleedges (apart for the last one), instead is #SYS_MultipleEdgesStop. You can modify them to suit your needs as you prefer...there is no need to change the code for that, just change those files as you prefer if you don't want the "spoiler"

Next time I have that with a Link, I will post here. I cant find the last one (I dont remember when happened and there is a lot of logs to find. Next time I will spam the chat with @ to be clear :D)

The edge one, I cant really tell when happens. It's rare, and I dont think there is a special case to appear. :(

And thanks for the #Vocab for the @multipleedges...I will change that

You re welcome
Ok, then, i ll wait some new info then.
Whenever you find a way to replicate them tell me and i will give a look and try to fix them, then... Until then i really dont know where to start since i never noticed such bugs as i said

[luke100787]

hi dont know if this is the right thread to post this but i just downloaded tease ai and cant get it to start when i click on it it shows up in the system tray for a few seconds then disappears

[Gormur]

hi dont know if this is the right thread to post this but i just downloaded tease ai and cant get it to start when i click on it it shows up in the system tray for a few seconds then disappears

Sounds like you need to install .net did you follow the instructions on the install post?

[luke100787]

hi dont know if this is the right thread to post this but i just downloaded tease ai and cant get it to start when i click on it it shows up in the system tray for a few seconds then disappears

Sounds like you need to install .net did you follow the instructions on the install post?

i already have .net installed

[Gormur]

hi dont know if this is the right thread to post this but i just downloaded tease ai and cant get it to start when i click on it it shows up in the system tray for a few seconds then disappears

Sounds like you need to install .net did you follow the instructions on the install post?

i already have .net installed

What versions? Think TeaseAI uses 4.0 or 4.5

[luke100787]

Sounds like you need to install .net did you follow the instructions on the install post?

i already have .net installed

What versions? Think TeaseAI uses 4.0 or 4.5

i have 4.5

[Gormur]

i already have .net installed

What versions? Think TeaseAI uses 4.0 or 4.5

i have 4.5

You need 4.0 as well. Not sure you need 3 and 3.5 but you need 4.0 for sure as well.

[sweden123]

edit: never mind, I found a solution

[Daragorn]

Ex:
[I cant handle, bla bla, bla bla]
[not stroking]
@flags(01)
@flags(02)
[not stroking end]

If you type "I cant handle" in a not stroking part, and dont have flags 01 or 02, a error line will appear. I could put a @NullResponse in the response file, but this would make a 50/50 to use the flag line, right? (I still can use a @NotFlag(01,02), but will force me to always remember to update that line when I add a new flag)

Would be possible to TeaseAI just ignore the response if none lines are available without flags, like if that part is blank?

sorry, just read this now (you added it after i already replied :D)

This is definitely not a bug, but working as intended and, yes, if you want to be sure that that line is used only when no flags are there, you have to do a @NotFlag(a,b,c,x) @NullResponse, otherwise, yes, a generic @NullResponse will always have a chance of being called no matter which flags are present and which not

And, no, that is not going to change since it is correct to have the program telling you that you tried to call a response but there are no response available...it could be an error you're not aware of, and not a "design" idea of your personality, so it needs to stay there since all it does is just telling you there is something wrong in your response file (apart from that, it causes no other issue).
It is up to the scripter to make responses that deal with all possibilities of their personalities