Interesting ongoing discussion about narrative frames, pornstar recognition, generic expectations, softcore versus hardcore, etc.. I think there's SO MUCH MORE to expectations and their fulfillment (or frustration) than many many people may realize, whenever creating anything that's meant to be "consumed" in an artistic or procedurally experienced manner. Anyhoo ...,
GucciTrain wrote:The porn star effect is definitely something where a scene would begin and I'd immediately notice whether it was gonna be soft core or hard core depending on the girl (which was why Rahyndee James in the first episode was refreshing).
On a related (but mildly tangential) note, I recently found that Rahyndee James appears in this completely non-pornographic (not even softcore) video as utterly fetching and irresistible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ-rsS0ZunM
I would not have run into that video at all, except that I was messing with the Bing Video Search settings and forgot to turn off safe-search filtering. It doesn't come up anywhere near the top of the results if you have Bing's safe-search set to "off," you'd probably never notice it. But now that I've seen this chick in "normal" daily hang-out manner ... wearing casual clothes around the house, reacting "naturally" to surprise sounds ... I don't care if it's staged, it LOOKS like it isn't staged ... wow does she now turn me on. There's something off-putting or oddly de-sexualizing about the expectation that she visually service me, go right to being my pornstar give-a-blowjob whore, in your normal hardcore scene. Here she comes to suck my cock, yeah yeah naked she sticks out her tongue grabs her tits, yeah yeah seen it before, if not of her then of someone else who's female and of a similar level of attractiveness to me, yeah yeah boner whatever.
This is just an example video. You can find tons of other "casual" or "civilian" views of hot women, whether they're porn stars or not. Watching Katy Perry prance around the wilderness in a pair of jeans-shorts, joking with her boyfriend, I noticed stuff. I saw, among other things, that she's chunkier than I thought. (Doesn't surprise me ... she has naturally large breasts, and she is a pretty good physical performer of dance and choreographed moves, so she would of course be muscular more so than your average anorexic movie star). I saw that she really really has a non-descript face when there isn't a lot of make-up on it. Which then made me notice that she is usually shown while wearing a lot of stage-style make-up, duh. But all of these recognitions, which taken one at a time might each be a mild negative slight to my level of attraction to Katy Perry, actually add up to making my mind be MORE rather than less attracted to her. She becomes "real" in my (warped, addled, wrong-headed, mislead) brain. I now "know" that she's not a plastic human. She would have remained plastic, if I'd only ever seen those silly rock videos in which she is deliberately a bit over-the-top and plasticene. But now ... uh oh, she and Rahyndee have "normal" lives, and I start to insert myself (mentally, in my imagination) into their behind-the-scenes lives.
I'd suggest that your next cock-hero style video could really be a mind-bender if you'd use some of these realizations. Girls who are in real-life just ... ya know ... being girls, in all their wonderful typically feminine silly human foibles and imperfections; and then, SCHWING but here she comes to suck my cock, oh boy oh boy naked she sticks out ...