Hello community and especially @Notay,
I am sorry but I have to interrupt here and make some points but I think they are more than worth considering.
First this project is starting to soon. 1885 expressed clearly (
in this post) that he wanted at least 3 months
time before we as a community could decide what to do with
his project.
Notay wrote:
I just want a solid TeaseAI like experience. I would rather work with 1885 then against him.
I would like to remind about something 1885 told us about after his first absence.
1885 wrote:
So when I get overwhelmed, I end up shutting down completely and can't do anything. What little energy I could muster was devoted towards the weeks-long process of handling offline issues.
So the problem I see here is just that 1885 clearly asked for 3 months not 2. And by putting up a competing project now you definitely are doing something against him. Competition now won't bring him back. It will drive him further away from coming back to the community.
I can back this point up by some personal information. Competition might have been starting to drive him away again in the first place. As I PM'd with 1885 around the time of is current disappearance he want to ask my input about a PM he got from a guy "politely" letting him know that he will be doing a competing project.
1885 wrote:This message really bothered me, because I have a year of my life's blood in Tease AI and it seemed like he was just up and saying "Heads up, I may start working on something like what you're doing, but works better and will read your scripts

"
Now lets assume 3 months have passed. I still think we should tackle his disappearance a bit different. From knowing the source of TeaseAI I can clearly back up anyone who would suggest a rewrite. In my opinion 1885 must have been a crazy mastermind in order to be able to even understand his own code, maintain it and debug it. Most of it isn't really that advanced stuff but the sheer mass and lets call it unneeded complexity made it kind of aesthetic on its own.
I think in order to prevent something like a code loss or even a complete program loss we should consider a community rewrite from scratch. We definitely have talented coders in our community who are easily capable of doing this.
Also more coders means less implementation time at least to a certain amount.
And one thing that has always been bothering me. Even if 1885 wont come back for whatever reason. This project is something that really showed some innovation and needed a lot of creativity to create. It is something 1885 beta tested with a lot of users from here and released here. So he clearly trusted this community. And should he leave his project behind we should return that trust by keeping his project alive push it further and shape it as a community. I don't think it is a good Idea for one person alone to maintain and develop it. I think 1885 would have wanted us to do this together.