[Release] Cock Hero 2K Titfuck

[ComboNo1]

Hi everyone, after what seems like a long time of working on it (and learning A LOT along the way), I am ready to give back to the Cock Hero world at large with my first video:

Cock Hero 2K Titfuck

Spoiler: show

ch-2ktf-preview.jpg (164.58 KiB) Viewed 18001 times

It's a big tits video with scenes of titfucking. I know that doesn't get it for some people, but for the first one, I made something like I would want to see. Hopefully you like it and can have fun with it, especially if you are into big tits (like me).

I used older clips that I had laying around on the computer, so it's not HD (it's 640x480 actually) and I tried to get music to match the era. It's all from 2000 - 2009, thus the "2K" part.

It's a short video - 6 rounds, total time is 28:33 - and a very small file 354 MB. It has a beat meter. And I have included a beat track mp3 for the electrocute your genitals crowd.



It's my first try at this, so I would love feedback and criticism - 'cause God help me - I am thinking about making another Cock Hero video (maybe a more mainstream girls only, or something else with more big tis I don't know right now) ... maybe after the New Year. I want to know what I did right, what I did wrong, what you didn't like, etc. Thanks!

Cock_Hero-2K_Titfuck.torrent

(53.45 KiB) Downloaded 4954 times

[wakel]

Thanks for the great work and contribution. It takes a lot of time and effort to put one of these together and it is always appreciated by the fans. The big tit theme was an excellent choice!!

Things done well:
1. content!!!! Everyone loves or should love huge tits. Definitely recommend you continue with this theme.
2. interesting beat meter, liked the color coded speed changes.
3. liked that the cum round was open and you could cum anytime you like rather than trying to time it with a countdown.

Areas to improve:
1. music choice - the songs were not bad, but they were a bit too slow and mellow, so they don't really build the excitement and pressure like it should progress in a cock hero. A great cock hero gets more difficult the further along you get in, but here it seemed steady at a very easy level.
2. pace of the beats was a bit too slow, felt more like a pace to keep an erection rather than build excitement. The result is that the cock hero is too easy, so I was able to beat it on first try.
3. Of course hi def has kinda become the standard nowadays.

But fair effort for your first try and to make your own new beat meter. Hope to see more in the future.

[ComboNo1]

Thanks for the great work and contribution. It takes a lot of time and effort to put one of these together and it is always appreciated by the fans. The big tit theme was an excellent choice!!

Things done well:
1. content!!!! Everyone loves or should love huge tits. Definitely recommend you continue with this theme.
2. interesting beat meter, liked the color coded speed changes.
3. liked that the cum round was open and you could cum anytime you like rather than trying to time it with a countdown.

wakel,

Thank you for taking the time to give me feedback after you watched the video, and thanks for the nice things you said too. I'm glad you liked my interpretation/attempt at a beat meter, and I'm glad you like how I did the cum round. I hadn't really put that much thought into WHEN to cum during the reward round, so it's almost accidental that I did it that way. But I agree that I personally prefer that way of doing it too, more than having a countdown to warn you when to cum at the end (but that way is good too, I just prefer the whole round way).

Areas to improve:
1. music choice - the songs were not bad, but they were a bit too slow and mellow, so they don't really build the excitement and pressure like it should progress in a cock hero. A great cock hero gets more difficult the further along you get in, but here it seemed steady at a very easy level.
2. pace of the beats was a bit too slow, felt more like a pace to keep an erection rather than build excitement. The result is that the cock hero is too easy, so I was able to beat it on first try.
3. Of course hi def has kinda become the standard nowadays.

Looking back on it now, I totally agree with points 1 & 2. I find about half the new Cock Hero videos that come out are very fast, and end up being too fast for me. My tricep and my shoulder can get sore/worn out to the point I can't finish some videos. Guess I'm old and/or out of shape.

But I guess I over-compensated for wanting something a little on the slower end. I have been thinking about it like driving a car somewhere, and it seems like a lot of videos start out at 80 or 90 mph and just get faster from there - let's say they top out at over 120 mph, where I made a video where I started out at 25-30 mph and never got it going past 45 or 55 mph. Maybe I don't want to end up over 100 mph, but I need to be going 80 or 90 by the end. Maybe that's still too slow?

And point #3, you're right again. When I start collecting clips for the next effort, it's got to be all hi def.

Thanks again, it's very helpful to hear what you had to say.

Also, would you mind if I used this:

Everyone loves or should love huge tits.

as my signature

[book_guy]

I'm not exactly a "big tit fan" usually -- I tend to prefer women of the sort who have smaller tits (not speaking of the tits themselves, but of the women usually attached to the tits) (and of course as a typical heterosexual male I won't say "no" to any appealing tits whatsoever anywhere on almost any woman). But this one got me. I really really liked all the scenery, even though it's not my preferred scenery. So, great job of splicing together appealing eye-candy!

Here's one constructive bit of criticism. Nothing too negative! Mostly great work! My biggest disappointment with this video is the way that, sometimes, the beat-METER doesn't always exactly match the SONG's audible beat. So, the music is kind of going a little irregular, but the beat-meter seems to insist on dogged computerized regularity, and that becomes a problem for a little bit of time. It's basically just a function of the fact that human musical performers are less accurate than computer simulations, sometimes just because they're human and can't be accurate, sometimes deliberately different for intended artistic effect. Either reason, though, and you've got to listen along to the beats and make sure the indicated beats at the bottom of the screen can be done in time to the music, and anticipated exactly enough that anyone who has never heard the music before, nevertheless can know exactly how to beat off to the beat-meter beats. So, I'd say about 10% of the time, the beat was working its way off the music to the point that I couldn't really follow it. I mean, I COULD follow it if I blanked out my mind, decided to pay attention to the beat-meter beats, stopped thinking in terms of porn, got all scientific, and took a great deal of care at following the beat. But of course I didn't want to do that. I wanted the beating to be as easy and natural as second-nature, so that the focusing part of the brain could go after the porn images, sounds, stimulation, of course.

Anyway, that's one thing to work on. I'm glad you put together this fine selection of hot chicks. I hope you can string them together in a kind of "rational" way next time, and that you can clean up the beat-meter beats so they perfectly mirror the sounds that I'm getting in my ears. And I definitely look forward to a next time! Wahoo! New theme? Same theme second time? Only the creator knows for sure ...

[book_guy]

Everyone loves or should love huge tits.

as my signature

You ain't got a signature right now ...

[hosenguy]

I am an older guy and seldom see the older porn in any quality that does not include a lot of grainy film. But I love the ladies from the past. They sometimes have that unkempt bush that is just teases as they push the covering down slowly....... Anyway I'm "excited" to see this. I also am one of the "electrocute your genitals crowd. " and I think I will commit to making a "stream" for my special use and share it. Probably take about a week because, after all, it has to be tested several times prior to "release". The slower pace is ideal for the electrocution of the happy parts.
I loved it, more please.

[ComboNo1]

My biggest disappointment with this video is the way that, sometimes, the beat-METER doesn't always exactly match the SONG's audible beat. So, the music is kind of going a little irregular, but the beat-meter seems to insist on dogged computerized regularity, and that becomes a problem for a little bit of time. It's basically just a function of the fact that human musical performers are less accurate than computer simulations, sometimes just because they're human and can't be accurate, sometimes deliberately different for intended artistic effect. Either reason, though, and you've got to listen along to the beats and make sure the indicated beats at the bottom of the screen can be done in time to the music, and anticipated exactly enough that anyone who has never heard the music before, nevertheless can know exactly how to beat off to the beat-meter beats. So, I'd say about 10% of the time, the beat was working its way off the music to the point that I couldn't really follow it.

book_guy,

I just want to make sure I understand what you are saying. The beat meter was visually in sync with the audible beats that I had added, right? The problem was that the beats that I added sometimes didn't match where they should have been with beat of the song? Is that what you are saying?

I used a drum machine program (hydrogen) which put out the robotic beats perfectly on time, but 2 or 3 of the songs I used had a little "drift" I guess you call it, and over time my beats got out of sync as the song went on, maybe half a second or so. I don't know what this is actually called (the musician term for the variance over time a human drummer introduces vs. a machine) or how to correct for it with the software, so I had to cut and move sections of my beats with audacity - and I have no doubts I was not careful enough and/or didn't line up the beats perfectly (from lack of musical skill, no ear for it, etc.)

Thanks for the kind words too. I am glad you enjoyed the video. It's a serious release, I put a lot of work into it (and learned tons making it), and I hope people enjoy playing it. But I also know what my skill level was going into this, and I am more than pleased it turned out as well as it did. It's a first try, and my "realistic" expectation was for it to be considered ok, or maybe even a little bit good by people that really dig the big tit content. So anything nice that is said is really appreciated.

Also, you mentioned stringing the chicks together in a "rational" way next time. Was it too chaotic? Did it look like I just threw clips together too much? (which I kind of did, truth be told).

Anyways, Thanks again for the feedback. It's very helpful!

[wakel]

Thanks again, it's very helpful to hear what you had to say.

Also, would you mind if I used this:

Everyone loves or should love huge tits.

as my signature

Of course you can, you earned it!!!

[ComboNo1]

hosenguy,

The slower pace is ideal for the electrocution of the happy parts.

That's great to know. I am really struggling with the speed of the beats issue right now. I know there are people that really love the fast, fast beats, and I personally like to go with a little slower to medium speed, and only faster stuff at the very end. However, I do think I went to slow for this video, the more I think about it.

I think I have read on other posts where people use a fleshlight and they appreciate a slower speed, and now I know that slower is better for the electro stim enjoyment too.

I really don't have an interest in building or buying one of those devices myself, but I am curious what the end result turns out to be. If you work out something for this video (or someone else does), let me know if it ends up being enjoyable or not.

I loved it, more please.

Thank you very much, and thanks for the feedback.

[wakel]

I love huge tits and your signature line.

[catchall]

I really enjoyed the general pacing here. The recent trend towards nonstop, super-fast beats isn't my cup of tea because they don't provide the long, slow build-up that classic CH video did. If I wanted to see how long I can hold out stroking as fast as possible, that's easy enough to do on my own.

So I liked that this video slowed things down and took time to let you focus on enjoying the process, rather than worrying if you were going to tear a rotator cuff during three straight minutes of triple-speed beats.

My only (very small) complaint would be this:

While I liked the generally slowed-down pacing, you do still need the occasional double time or faster beat sections to keep things interesting. When these happened near the end, I felt like they could have lasted a bit longer. At least long enough to feel like you're "getting into the groove" with them before switching back to standard beats. 20-30 seconds is probably enough.

Anyway, I really enjoyed this and hope you make many more!

[book_guy]

book_guy,

I just want to make sure I understand what you are saying. The beat meter was visually in sync with the audible beats that I had added, right? The problem was that the beats that I added sometimes didn't match where they should have been with beat of the song? Is that what you are saying?

Hey, I'll look again in the near future and see if I can pinpoint a few spots on the time-index where that thing is taking place. Or maybe it wasn't a problem in "Titfuck" and instead I'm thinking about another one of the recent cock-hero style releases? I'm sorry, I thought it was a straightforward comment, but it's looking like it will take a bit more explaining, so, let me get back to you ok?

In any case, great work on contributing, and thanks!

[ComboNo1]

catchall,

Thank you for the feedback and the kind words. I'm glad you enjoyed the video.

My only (very small) complaint would be this:

While I liked the generally slowed-down pacing, you do still need the occasional double time or faster beat sections to keep things interesting. When these happened near the end, I felt like they could have lasted a bit longer. At least long enough to feel like you're "getting into the groove" with them before switching back to standard beats. 20-30 seconds is probably enough.

You are totally right about this.

I recognize this needs work for the next attempt on my part (how the beats turned out overall). I am planning on doing some kind of beta or some other way of asking for input from the community at large when the time comes on my next project. It's a ways off now, but after getting one Cock Hero creation under my belt, I now realize how vitally important this really is.

Thanks again!

[ComboNo1]

Thanks again to everyone that gave me some feedback about this. I am listening, and thinking about what everyone has to say, because I feel all the feedback is important. I kind of made a video that *I* would like to see, but I released it out there, so at the end of the day the most important thing is that people enjoy the final product.

To kind of go into a wood working example, I made this video out of wood from the scrap pile. A lot of people out there are way better at creating this stuff than me. They can build some custom kitchen cabinets or add an addition on to their house or whatever. I'm just glad that I found out I was capable of putting together a box, or a bird feeder, or maybe a tree house. And that I saw the project all the way through to the end.

When i started, I couldn't nail two boards together without having it be crooked and bending the nail.

Now that I have produced something, I'm ready to give it another stab and try again (in the near future). I understand the process so much better now, and I've learned a lot up to this point (never made a .torrent file before is just one of many little things I learned how to do, for example).

And I've got to talk with some people here, which I feel helped out a lot too.

I'm glad people enjoyed this video, and I still welcome anything anyone has to say: good, bad, harsh whatever. I like to hear it.

For my next trick, I just started to grab a few videos last night (all HD this time). No real theme in mind yet or anything, but I know my next attempt can be a lot better. Working on the "2K Titfuck" video was so time consuming, but not even a week later and I miss doing it ...

Anyways, I am starting to ramble on, so let me just say thanks again to everyone!

[book_guy]

book_guy,

I just want to make sure I understand what you are saying. The beat meter was visually in sync with the audible beats that I had added, right? The problem was that the beats that I added sometimes didn't match where they should have been with beat of the song? Is that what you are saying?

Hey, I'll look again in the near future and see if I can pinpoint a few spots on the time-index where that thing is taking place. Or maybe it wasn't a problem in "Titfuck" and instead I'm thinking about another one of the recent cock-hero style releases? I'm sorry, I thought it was a straightforward comment, but it's looking like it will take a bit more explaining, so, let me get back to you ok?

In any case, great work on contributing, and thanks!

My bad, I'm pretty sure I put that feedback into the wrong thread. I'm very sorry. After having watched Titfuck through again, I haven't identified any points in it that remind me of the feedback that I gave, in which I described a problem of bad synchronization between music and beats. Maybe I was watching a badly synchronized version on my first viewing, due to glitch in download or in my own set-up and video player, or maybe I was actually watching another of the recent cock-hero style releases and then mistakenly attributed one of their weaknesses to your video. In any case, whatever the reason, I can't find the problem any more.

So, well done! The problem fixed itself! (heh ... just kidding ...)

Sorry for the mistake. Great that you're contributing, and great that you took the (potential) criticism so well.