Autoeroticon 2

[book_guy]

Just found this ... Autoeroticon 2, not by me, very good video. Uses voice-over of a few fairly famous erotic hypnosis dommes, and images of super hotness porn action basically like a Cock Hero video would. I didn't really like Autoeroticon 1 when I first found it because it had too much sissy content, which is not my style. This one is a vanilla cum-instruction hypnosis induction.

http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=892728987

[Ms. Julie]

Nicely done. The induction video is especially nice. I thought about trying to do something like this, but wasn't sure how to go about it.

I'm kind of surprised you enjoyed this. For some reason I imagined you wouldn't be into hypnosis that much.

[solicit10]

this is pretty good. i really am digging this hypno style of videos...
its pretty awesome to zone out to them, not always that easy however lol

[les]

                     
                     It appears there are 3 videos
                     But video 3 has been pulled from several sites.
                     
                    Bing Porn Video Search 

                    I have found to be the best video search engine

[Idiolect]

There was another thread last year that I remember responding to that actually referenced Autoeroticon 1 & 2. The thread was someone finding the video Orgasmatron One. All these videos I think were created by the same guy a little over a year ago, and are all pretty much hypno/trance compilation videos. The first few videos were originally found on xnxx or xvideos. Later on I noticed the author had posted like 20 more videos on pornhub and even had a profile. After a while his profile was gone along with some of the videos, but several of them still are there.

http://www.milovana.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=13214

[blondie88]

Love the idea of a video that will literally lead you to an orgasm without touching yourself.. but i wasn't so impressed by this. Great idea though. Would love to see more stuff like this thats for sure..

[Coder]

Pretty sure this is Numberonefan. Very good video creator, but be warned very heavy on the sissy/shemale stuff if you don't like that. If you do like it, happy days.
A lot of his stuff (including some very new) here
http://xhamster.com/user/video/numberonefan/new-1.html

Really goes well with long estim IMO :D

[book_guy]

You can find user-name "numberonefan" at both X-Hamster and Porn-Hub if you just use a little common sense to navigate their search and membership functions. His productions are generally high-quality, and if you find one that uses the type of porn which coincides with your own interests then you'll probably really like it. He is, as mentioned, into sissy-fication, which isn't really my thing.

I have just put four of his rather more vanilla, less sissy, videos on a playlist at Porn-Hub here :

http://www.pornhub.com/playlist/13653531

[kong]

Didn't he create something named Masturbatrix i, ii and iii?
I think they were pretty great, without the shemale-stuff, more joi and femdom.
If you find a link, post it, I find them deleted now... :(

[book_guy]

Didn't he create something named Masturbatrix i, ii and iii?... I find them deleted now... :(

Yeah, my Bing and Google video searches do yield a few hits, but I also can't get to the file itself, only a bit of a record of the traces of the former existence of those videos. Would be nice to find it.

Personally, I am very much into the idea of "being instructed" (by whomever or whatever: by a dominatrix, by a beat-meter, by a metronome, by hypnosis, etc.) but I am NOT personally very much into many of the concepts that generally accompany instruction -- viz., humiliation, fem-domme aggression and belittling, cum-eating, being laughed at, sissification or sissy-fication or however you spell it, etc.. These non-sissy preferences seem to make me an odd-man-out in the instruction-oriented-porn audience. Or, so I am coming to understand, on the basis of my internet searches, in which I tend to find that almost anything instruction-oriented is also sissy-oriented or similar.

Odd conclusion. If it's actually a fact, that MOST people who are seeking to observe instruction-oriented porn are ALSO seeking to observe sissy-oriented porn, then, I'm surprised. It surprises me about the same way that the mis-read from that blogger (recent other thread) about wrong-hand fapping in cock-hero videos surprises me. I basically think there's something uncommunicated about the idea of the cock-hero and instruction genres. I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that a willingness and/or desire to RECEIVE INSTRUCTION is not the same as a desire to SUBMIT to a dominant woman. But the porn purveyors seem to be missing that fact, generally speaking.

Personally, I wish there were more along the lines of the Autoeroticon-2 -- anything having to do with "causing" or "controlling" my sexual urges and stimuli (I say YES to: "you must stroke now" and "you must only touch the head" and "you must stop stroking now"); but WITHOUT controlling my spirit or willpower (I say NO to: "you are a little worm" or "eat your cum now" or "you have a laughably tiny dick" or "submit to your goddess NOW you underling"). Am I the odd-man-out, or to the contrary, are my preferences rather more mainstream and therefore the porn-purveyors are missing a great opportunity?

Probably no way to get a definitive answer. But. Meh. Anyway, interesting discussion.

[redno]

I feel the same way.

[Idiolect]

Personally, I am very much into the idea of "being instructed" (by whomever or whatever: by a dominatrix, by a beat-meter, by a metronome, by hypnosis, etc.) but I am NOT personally very much into many of the concepts that generally accompany instruction -- viz., humiliation, fem-domme aggression and belittling, cum-eating, being laughed at, sissification or sissy-fication or however you spell it, etc.. These non-sissy preferences seem to make me an odd-man-out in the instruction-oriented-porn audience. Or, so I am coming to understand, on the basis of my internet searches, in which I tend to find that almost anything instruction-oriented is also sissy-oriented or similar.

I'm actually with you on this. While I am a fan of the instruction aspect, I am not into the whole sissyfication/humiliation thing. You are also right in that most of the instruction oriented porn is more often than not going to incorporate some kind of domination/submission/sissyfication. This is why I tend to just stick to CH and teases that do not incorporate that subject matter.

Odd conclusion. If it's actually a fact, that MOST people who are seeking to observe instruction-oriented porn are ALSO seeking to observe sissy-oriented porn, then, I'm surprised. It surprises me about the same way that the mis-read from that blogger (recent other thread) about wrong-hand fapping in cock-hero videos surprises me. I basically think there's something uncommunicated about the idea of the cock-hero and instruction genres. I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that a willingness and/or desire to RECEIVE INSTRUCTION is not the same as a desire to SUBMIT to a dominant woman. But the porn purveyors seem to be missing that fact, generally speaking.

There's two ways to look at this...
1. If you are willing to receive instruction, that does not necessarily mean you are willing to submit.
2. If you are willing to submit, then by default you are willing to receive instruction.
I think the idea of CH/Instruction, is not so much uncommunicated, as it is misunderstood or misinterpreted. Which I think is what happened in the case of the blogger. He's looking at CH from a gamer perspective, not from the perspective of one looking to be teased (personally I see CH as less of a game and more of a glorified tease).