Tales of the banned

This is the place for general discussions on fetishes, sexuality and anything else. What's on your mind right now?
User avatar
Banquo
Experimentor
Experimentor
Posts: 7927
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:34 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Switch
Location: Mutter’s Spiral

Re: Tales of the banned

Post by Banquo »

Okay, so I was going to avoid this thread as the argument had become cyclical and pantomimesque in "oh no I didn't" "Oh yes you did" Punch and Judy fashion. But there are a couple of posts I can't help but disagree with, and I think a wider debate about safety and responsibility is something worthwhile.

Shell and Dr.D

I can understand your desire to empathize with shawn, and try to understand why he has been behaving the way he has. But I can't agree that anything that's going on in his outside life should mitigate his behaviour here.

Your compassion towards him is admirable, and I agree that some of the comments on this thread have been overtly aggressive towards him, perhaps needlessly. But your efforts are just enabling him, and opening up a debate that isn't really relevant. The way I see it, Shawn was warned about his behaviour many many times. On many different occasions. The mods have said, he was given several warnings, by more than one mod.

And that is before you consider his attitude towards other users that he's not playing with. More than a couple of people have spoken to me about him on more than a few occasions, about how rude and obnoxious he can be towards people. The picture that has been painted seems to be that he's generally a bad egg. And I don't think it's fair to overly criticize the mods decision to remove him from the chat. I'm sure you both remember bee, and how damaging her behaviour was, and how the inactivity of the mods allowed that to drag on for far too long. This is the mirror of that situation, the mods now have the confidence and the power to deal with problems like this one. I can't see that as anything other than a good thing.

Indigo.

The idea that subs should hold some form of responsibility has already been discussed. Sure everyone holds a personal responsibility to look out for themselves. But we aren't always talking about people who are in a responsible state of mind. As has already been discussed with some pretty extreme examples from Dr.D and Jasmine.

I'm not suggesting that extreme tasks and riskier elements of play shouldn't be explored, but the riskier things get, the more the situation, the scene and the sub, need to be handled with care.

When I was starting out here. A dom, whom I respect and have learned a lot from once said to me, that the sub holds all of the power, they control what they do and don't want to do, he was right. To an extent.

The subs limits and capabilities are the canvas upon which a dom can paint their scene. But if you don't respect those limitations once you are in the scene, things can go wrong. Some people can slip into subspace very easily, people especially newbies, can be very eager to please their dom, and are simply happy to have the attention of someone with a dominant tendency. We all know the ratio of subs and doms that exists in the chat room here. So it's very easy for inexperienced subs to stumble into the room and fall in with someone that is wielding a power over them that they don't even know themselves. We all know the kind of thing...

s1ave4u wrote:8.01pm: Hi M sub 22 here, will do anything for domme.

-----silence-----

s1ave4u wrote:8.15pm: Any dommes in here to play with sub M 22? I will do anything.


-----silence-----


s1ave4u wrote:8.22pm: Please can I have a task! I will do ANYTHING 4 U

They are an easy target for ridicule, and all to easy to dismiss. But I can guarantee that many many of the regular chat users started out this way. I know I did. Lucky for me I came in on a good day and was welcomed by most, though not all.

But what if s1ave4u has already done a couple of teases and is feeling really submissive. And he stumbles into the room, desperately trying to extend that high, that amazing feeling of submission, and someone with no respect for him tells him to go and carve the word slave into his arm with a razor blade. He's either going to scar himself for life, or be snapped out of his evenings fun by such a cruel suggestion. Either way, he's going to get the impression that Milo isn't the most welcoming of chat rooms.
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars - Oscar Wilde

My Webteases
Chastity Captions
User avatar
dr.d
Experimentor
Experimentor
Posts: 1405
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:39 am
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Dom (Male)

Re: Tales of the banned

Post by dr.d »

ok , I was wrong about not posting here again....

Banquo the last thing I want to do is enable shawn , I agree with the mods decision , something had to be done and banning shawn was the only thing to do , with my last post all I wanted to do was say that I had no right to attack him in the forums, I do not know what went on in the chat room , I was not there when it happened but I have heard stories........and I believe them , I trust the people who told me about what happened


but that doesn't give me the right to call him names in the forum, I won't say I love this site as much as Natalie , but I do like it here and I enjoy time in the chat room with friends and I respect the mods here , they are the best
She is the Angel that dances in my heart
User avatar
Tashi
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:26 pm
Gender: Transsexual/Transgender
Sexual Orientation: Bisexual/Bi-Curious
I am a: Switch
Dom/me(s): My Goddess, the Queen of my Soul
Sub/Slave(s): http://tashilicious.tumblr.com/post/150 ... okers-here

No slaves, but I'd love for a wanker to play this

Re: Tales of the banned

Post by Tashi »

I fail to see what his life outside of here has to do with anything, as the judgements we've made are based on his words, actions and behaviours on here.

The same words, actions and behaviours that if they were done in an offline kink community would have had him banned. Which is something that still no one has bothered to address.
Laura
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:34 am
Gender: Female
Sexual Orientation: Straight
I am a: Switch

Re: Tales of the banned

Post by Laura »

The original first post (that is now Community 2.0) was literally about looking at people's lives outside of the site. The whole idea was that everyone has a story, and often that story is not known.

There is a point however in that not knowing one's story doesn't allow everyone to understand a person fully. I don't think it should be an excuse for behaviour here, but it does factor in in different ways. So in reality, people's lives outside of the site are extremely relevant.
Miss Shell
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:29 pm

Re: Tales of the banned

Post by Miss Shell »

Banquo wrote:
Your compassion towards him is admirable, and I agree that some of the comments on this thread have been overtly aggressive towards him, perhaps needlessly. But your efforts are just enabling him, and opening up a debate that isn't really relevant. The way I see it, Shawn was warned about his behaviour many many times. On many different occasions. The mods have said, he was given several warnings, by more than one mod.
I suppose on this topic, we are going to have to disagree, darlin. I don't believe it's enabling someone, when you are kind to them.
As for the debate that isn't relevant....again, we will have to disagree....because I think that any topic that helps individuals move forward in life, possibly opening their eyes to something they hadn't seen before is not irrelevant.

I'm glad that we care about each other, so that agreeing to disagree doesn't harm our friendship. *warm smile*
And I don't think it's fair to overly criticize the mods decision to remove him from the chat.
I'm not really sure how you got that impression, that I was criticizing the mods that removed Shawn from chat. I have re-read what I wrote, just to make sure, and I see nothing at all where I criticized them.
As a matter of fact, I wrote a paragraph supporting the role that Mod's play in chat rooms.

However, Magikk and Dream....if you thought I was being critical of you, in the decisions that you made, I deeply apologize, that was not my intention what so ever. *gentle smile*
Miss Shell
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:29 pm

Re: Tales of the banned

Post by Miss Shell »

Jp....*hugs you close*

First, thank you for honoring my words the way you did, that was very touching. *gentle smile*

Second....thank you for sharing your thoughts...I have always admired your views on things going on at Milo. You are a treasure and I hope someone lets you know that, daily. *smile*
Post Reply