That's fair, and I certainly didn't mean this thread to imply that the rest of us have any right to dictate how CH creators should work.Jupiter wrote: Though I can see the appeal to smaller file size, I don't typically leave my computer on for a solid 4 hours (laptop). Saving roughly half a gig would take me ~4 extra hours to prepare the video, but only makes about a 20-30 minute difference when distributing the torrent. For incredibly large files (like the big megapacks on Emp) using this is a good idea. A series of videos that would have been ~100GB was reduced to about 70 using handbrake. The point is this really isn't worth the average user's time. I delete most things thing after a few views. If you're going to keep a mountain of porn on your computer then it's a very useful program.
However, there have been quite a few CH videos posted that are huge, despite being made up of videos that are not especially high-quality. Perhaps that was an intentional decision on the part of the author, but I think it's more plausible that there are some CH creators who simply don't know much about video compression.
The whole point of this is to give those people a resource on the subject, and I think that's a goal at which we've succeeded admirably.




