Hey everyone 'Mistress Jen' is a Guy!!!!

[_bobby_]

I've just had a post warning about a member trying to con other members on this site out of their hard earned cash, which was deleted.
It was apparently 'against the rules' as it included a screen shot of the chat, as proof that Missbangsz and czabrinaclaire are one and the same person. And He/She is trying to sign subs up to BDSM and one assume makes a little money from them some how.

As the Mods on this site seems happy for this to happen, one has to ask why?

It's very easy to warn users that these things are taking place here, two of us even provided screen shots of her(?) doing her deeds. And they were both deleted ! It seems that the mods on this sight are here to help those who are trying to rip the rest of us off. Don't make any sense to me

Oh, and btw for anyone who doesn't know 'Mistress Jen' is really a guy, yep he really is so if any of you subs have....you know ........ thinking she's a girl ,,,well sorry, no he just seems to get his kicks from fooling guys into thinking so.

Note to Mods: As Milo is an open and free form any unnecessary censorship community, and as this thread doesn't brake any rules there's no reason to delete it, is there?

Unless the guy pretending to be 'Mistress Jen' want's to brake Milo rules

[Venus]

In my opinion there's only one reason why these threads got closed: Name Calling.
Most forums that I know have a rule that you aren't allowed to denounce people. I think the reason is obvious.

I don't know if the Milovana Forum has this rule, but it wouldn't surprise me.
And if there is this rule, then yes this thread would break this rule

[youaswell]

CONFIRMED. MODS TRYING TO COVER IT UP! THEY'RE FLIPPING OUT!

QUICKLY BEFORE THEY DELETE THIS THREAD!

MODS ARE JohnS. THE TRUTH HAS BEEN REVEALED!!!1 DON'T FALL FOR THIS SHEEPLE!!!1111

[Princess_HKitty]

wtf

regardless of what is or isn't true, you two are not flattering yourself at all with this. it's not like jen ever plays with randoms anyways, so what's it to you who's behind that keyboard? hyperventilating and allcapsing about how omg-it's-a-guy-ewww-lol is pretty much the polar opposite of the sex-positive welcoming community ideal that milo is built on.

i don't have a dog in this fight but i had to point out, you're making complete asses of yourselves with this.

[DoxysTurtle]

I've just had a post warning about a member trying to con other members on this site out of their hard earned cash, which was deleted.
It was apparently 'against the rules' as it included a screen shot of the chat, as proof that Missbangsz and czabrinaclaire are one and the same person. And He/She is trying to sign subs up to BDSM and one assume makes a little money from them some how.

I just want to point out that PUBLIC posting of that was against the stated rules on the site, as is the scamming. Had you taken the approach of sending it to Forum Mods/Milovana Team in a forum PM where it's not publicly posted, breaking the rules, it'd probably have gotten a very different response Bobby. Now you making the statement that they were scamming and putting the link they both used wouldn't have violated the rules, but as the rules are written public posting of chats isn't allowed.

Materials in chat are meant to remain in chat. That means no posting of chat conversations in the forums will be permitted. Violation of this policy will result in the offending material being deleted by a Milovana Team Member, in accordance with Milovana policy, and the offending member being issued a warning.

I'm not going to comment one way or the other on the other statement made in this, as I don't see the two as relevantly related, regardless of the factuality of either. I'd not weigh in one way were you presenting these as seperate issues you wanted to bring attention to, but the way this is written it comes off far more as a personal attack/spite filled, instead of that. You might reconsider your approach were that not your intent.

[vladimir_bz_lion]

Unshaved men under women nicknames - The harsh reality of sex-forums ....

[achingblueballs]

Mistress Jenifer is herself, she's never claimed to be anything she's not.

99.9% of the webteases are written by guys.

If you are turned off by any of these things, find somewhere else to play. Small minded people are seldomly missed.

[youaswell]

Mods are gods!!!!1

[SexualChoc]

sigh!!
if you are going to flame people...
expect to get burned...
such Harsh labels!!
I vote to delete all of this!
and as a strait heterosexual male, I have no difficulty Loving her

[denied_fate]

Most people who enter the chat room know that "bots" always find a way in. You don't need to announce it.

Don't spread any rumors without evidence to back it up. What proof do you have that Mistress Jen is a guy?

How old are you anyways? You telling on people like a 10 year old.

[youaswell]

Wake up sheeple!!!!1

[Princess_HKitty]

uh...wake up to what

[_bobby_]

Grateful for all the comments and opinions for far, hope to have time to comment on as many as poss next week. Keep 'em coming

Thanks in advance, Bobby

[ronin]

Don't spread any rumors without evidence to back it up. What proof do you have that Mistress Jen is a guy?

I remember this being the case as well - there was another forum topic about this some years back - but it seems that all of the threads from that era have been edited out.

But what does it really matter? This whole site is a fantasy base, a place where people can come to safely explore alternate sexuality without fear of reprisal. So Jenifer has chosen to identify as female - so what? My only problem with it is the inherent dishonesty and purposeful misrepresentation. If she stated in her/his profile that she/he is a male-identifying as female Dominant, it wouldn't bother me a bit.

[jackstock]

yeah you're just making an ass of yourself with this thread.
It doesn't even matter the gender. They provide an online service, just like any of the webteases you do....

you guys have good intention trying to bring this up, but really there is no need to worry about it