The audio files have an effect I call "low frequency effects". This are fast (hard) modulation changes that do not appear on all electrodes.
In 'Audio/11' these effects are generated with amplitude modulation. in 'Audio/2' they are generated with phase modulation. For males usually the prostate electrode is the low frequency electrode. With
standard electrode setup usually butt is channel 2 for 'Audio/11' and common for 'Audio/2'.
For me with this setup 'Audio/2' feels more rough. That's why I recommend 'Audio/11' if sound files are fixed (like in EOS).
Electro wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2020 7:27 pm
In the same tri-phase configuration, if using the 'Audio/11' files instead of 'Audio/2', how do the 'x' files compare?
Try it out! You can enable the debug mode in gasm for that. Then you also see which audio files are used.
The pain files use many different effects including the low frequency effects I described above. With pain files 'Audio/2' might be the better choice. This should be tried out. It even may be opportune to use files from both audio directories -- has to be tried out.
You mentioned in an earlier post that with a common electrode that the levels were adjusted to be less painful in the tri-phase 'audio/2' files, I think?
In 3-phase setups channels are mixed. Therefore non-synchronous shocks feel weaker/less harsh than synchronous ones. How strong this difference is, depends on electrode setup.
For this reason all shocks but the "low frequency effects" (they do not appear on all electrodes) are synchronous in current files.
The pain files can be divided in 4 groups
'x0' and 'x1' have the lowest shock density
'x2', 'x3' and 'x5' have a medium shock density
'x4' and 'x6' have the highest shock density but shocks are non-synchronous
'x7', 'x8' and 'x9' have the highest shock density, shocks are synchronous"
Are the x0,1,2,3,5 all synchronous? ..or non-synchronous?
This information is outdated. The current pain files use much more effects. Which effects are used how also depends on the algorithm (sound file directory).
One issue I forget to mention in my previous post is the assignment of pain level to to the normal levels in the test tease:
After level 1: 'x0'
After level 2: 'x1', x'2'
After level 3: 'x3', 'x4'
After level 4: 'x5', 'x6'
After level 5: 'x8', 'x8'
I notice that these pain files when compared to files from other teases such as the eStim Tower, even the louder pain files in the GuideMe version feel like they are similar to the x0,x1 level when used together with the levels of the rest of the 'n', 'v', 's', etc files. Making a comparison, it seems that the volume of the files themselves are roughly the same as eStim tower, but the eStim tower pleasure files are at a higher relative volume which makes them less painful because the volume is set lower when calibrated to them.
Do you mean the pain files are to loud? E.g. 'x0' is intended to be rather mild. (For me this is true). If it feels like a real pain file compared 'n', 'v', 's' files of the first levels I would reduce the volume.
Then again, I'm using version 1.6 files and don't know what level changes might have happened in the latest version of the pain files.
There where some volume adjustments of pain files in v1.7.
For the record, I actually like the pain files being at the higher level, but if I designed a tease around them, I would reduce the duration because the roughly 8 minutes of anything above the lower level files and I'm in too much pain by the time the pleasure starts again. I think I've got 2-3 minutes of tolerance of the highest levels if I'm not reducing the volume unless I were to be at a 'final mistress' challenge/boss(if it's a game) or something.
Yes, the test tease was not made with much love. As mentioned, it does not follow the recommendations from my provious post. In particular it also uses the 120s files ending with 'x' . (In the debug mode you can skip them)