Oh sure! Use logic and intelligence to dispute my point. That's just great. Now, how am I supposed to argue with that?seraph0x wrote: However, on a more general note: I would remind authors that anything that improves readership should be considered a good thing by both sides. There are simply situations where not following an instruction are practical necessities. A tease is fundamentally static and authors can't anticipate *every* possibility. That's why it makes sense to give readers the flexibility to compensate for real life and simply do the tease to the best of their ability.
You're right of course, anything that increases readership should be considered a good thing and I can't anticipate everything that might happen. Still.....(you knew that was coming didn't you?)
Most webteases are written to take half an hour to an hour. Some are longer, some are shorter, but seems to be the average there. I can't imagine why anyone would need to save a half hour tease and come back later. It might be useful for the "all day" kinds of things, but I don't see much use in it for the shorter ones.
Seems like a lot of effort for minimal return.
Like I said before, if saving is included, I'll learn to work with it, I just don't see it as a major need.
