A Princess' Tease

[Jaberwocky]

Men are told to be better with numbers. But for some reasons, giving true meaning to those numbers seems to be harsh.

Simple example:
25 subs, one Princess. Let's say it take 10 minutes to read a message and sent a very short reply. 25 subs writing a message on a certain day, more than 4 hours work for the Princess on that day. If she has a work and a personal life, unless she does not sleep, she will not be able to reply them all.

Paying money:
If keeping up a site, take so much time, getting some income out of it looks appropriate to me. Don't like it? Than don't join, or unsubscribe.

Milovana:
A ratio of 1 lady versus how many??? A little over 25 would be a nice understatement!

Guys:
Do the math, and try to figure out what those numbers mean!

To Princess Raquel:
I know it is hard, but with that many anonymous people around, ignore the jerks. Making a frown would already be too much. But as said, I know that is hard to do, very hard.

Epiloge:
Those who should read one or two comments like this, probably won't.

[Marke]

Well put Jabberwocky, and if you throw in personal grooming as well, … time disappears pretty fast. STC should have at least taught him that – dressing for pleasure is not a quick thing to do.

Patience is a virtue - Princess Raquel used to have that on Her web site. It is very true.

And if you want something for free or on the cheap then patience is even more essential.

And if money is changing hands, well, if you are not happy with the service go elsewhere.

The nice thing to do is always offer feedback and that way just maybe the service will improve. Or at least be influenced.

But anyway, I for one am very upset that Princess Raquel has taken away Her teases and closed her web site.

[Timshel]

I agree that Gawanhir's comments were negative and perhaps rude depending on one's perspective, but as it seems they are not without factual basis. I'm quite sure the same facts could of been presented in a more positive or private way but I don't understand the reaction to him.

No matter what the service and no matter what the charge it's quite hard to satisfy all those who pay for it.

Then to see the guy's response edited away and everything else left up...You might as well censor the whole thread and lock it down. <shrug>

Hope all those intimately involved have had a chance to let things process and get time away from the moment...it's really just one person complaining. As everyone tends to do. Every other post by this guy has been constuctive if not positive. 1 negative post does not a pattern make.

[Princess Raquel]

Dark now has me curious as to why the post was edited, lol

I expected a rebuttle but was it really that bad. Like I said, I welcome people with issues about be but there are certain ways to go about it. I agree with Timshel about the censorship fairness.

Remember, in America we believe in freedom of speech, unless it is George W. Bush doing the talking

[dark]

I only removed his comment for one reason: this forum topic is (was) about Raquels webtease. The user Gawanhir used this topic to discuss a personal issue between him and Raquel in public. I don't think that a public forum is the right place for that, we have a PM feature here.

Gawanhir's post was criticizing but not abusive. I want to defend him here, he maybe made a mistake but these things happen in forums every day. He didn't insult anybody with his post. For personal problems with one person we have a PM feature. That is all Free speech is very welcomed here but please no personal disputes between two persons in a public place.

It's not easy to handle these issues for me, I just try to find the best solution for the forum. A personal dispute should be solved by the parties in an intimate atmosphere.