Need for Moderator

[philo]

Yeah, that's taking the piss. We need to get a handle on this.

Yes I guess in the short term we just need to hammer them with 1 votes.

[Gsus]

Sadly it looks that they're also using accounts to spam their webteases with 5 votes. I just gave one a vote of 1 and the overall vote of 2 didn't move.

Edit : And the score is going up... so the guy who created the tease is creating multiple accounts to prevent his shit being 'moderated'.

[VanHellsing]

Now they have stolen the O-Control title and used it on their tease to pretend to be legit.... someone needs to ban this person

He's been posting those shitty advertisements from several accounts already. Banning one or more accounts won't make a difference. From what I see, he also has many accounts for rating those webteases. I was against this idea, but maybe we should have several moderators who can accept or reject webteases every day, before they appear on the site.

[Gsus]

I'd expect that it's easy to see a voting pattern on the spam compared to everything else.

So perhaps a few votes of 1 would flag something as needing moderation and hide it, regardless of high votes. It should be possible to set a threshold that would not affect normal content, but if it does a moderator can fix it.

Alternatively moderate every tease from a new poster, and once it's been marked as ok then they don't get any more moderated.