Classic CH format - anyone?
Moderator: andyp
Re: Classic CH format - anyone?
I agree with everything except the Milovana rocks part. We're still their bastard stepchild. I have to image that we generate a good amount of traffic to the site and yet we're still relegated to this little corner. Until we are accepted as a legitimate part of this site and given full status I will continue with my stance that Milovana not only doesn't rock, they in fact don't even want us here. Until a Cock Hero video can with tease of the month F- Milovana in my opinion. If all of you went somewhere else I'd follow in a heartbeat. I have no loyalty to a community that doesn't even want us.
-
bunroast
- Curious Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 3:52 pm
- Gender: Male
- Sexual Orientation: Straight
- I am a: None of the above
Re: Classic CH format - anyone?
I'm not really keen posting on and criticizing specific works, but I feel like this post has scratched me where I itch. For better or worse, there is a lack of "classic" style CH productions in recent releases. For my 2 cents, here's my list of POSITIVES for both the old(er) and new(er):
CH & Flux: tease and buildup, focus on fewer (3 or less) models/scenes per round, simpler beats, fewer beat changes, text/vocal teases and cues, and timely rest and recovery.
Later releases: newer models/scenes, extensive hardcore action, superior cumshot sequences, two-handed action (I'm ambidextrous, so thanks Frivolous), and more stimulating beats.
Of course, these are generalizations, and each episode of each production has its own strengths, and many have kept a lot of the core principles of the early works. As far as length is concerned, it is largely unimportant to me (except when my time is limited) since I can usually keep hard (90 mins or so) if the action is enticing enough.
I love the classic works, and always keep them in the mix. But I also love the innovation and creative direction that many of the newer authors have put forth. If any authors (new or experienced) are inspired to create some CH videos in the more "classic" format, I think that is fantastic. Perhaps the biggest hesitation is a fear of "ripping off" a beloved author's style. At the same time, I hope that a yearning for the old format in this thread does not discourage any authors from trying new approaches and exciting new gameplay twists.
Keep up the great work everyone! And remember, everyone's opinion is different... The only thing we truly have in common is a desire to get off!
CH & Flux: tease and buildup, focus on fewer (3 or less) models/scenes per round, simpler beats, fewer beat changes, text/vocal teases and cues, and timely rest and recovery.
Later releases: newer models/scenes, extensive hardcore action, superior cumshot sequences, two-handed action (I'm ambidextrous, so thanks Frivolous), and more stimulating beats.
Of course, these are generalizations, and each episode of each production has its own strengths, and many have kept a lot of the core principles of the early works. As far as length is concerned, it is largely unimportant to me (except when my time is limited) since I can usually keep hard (90 mins or so) if the action is enticing enough.
I love the classic works, and always keep them in the mix. But I also love the innovation and creative direction that many of the newer authors have put forth. If any authors (new or experienced) are inspired to create some CH videos in the more "classic" format, I think that is fantastic. Perhaps the biggest hesitation is a fear of "ripping off" a beloved author's style. At the same time, I hope that a yearning for the old format in this thread does not discourage any authors from trying new approaches and exciting new gameplay twists.
Keep up the great work everyone! And remember, everyone's opinion is different... The only thing we truly have in common is a desire to get off!