porn taught her that you don't need to have blonde hair, blue eyes, and big breasts to be loved by men. She thought it was the most wonderful thing anyone has ever said to her.
Point is, everyone like different girls. Moreover, some of my friends like girls that I find completely unattractive.
There really are not so many people who look bad no matter how they try. Naturally, if a girl looks after herself, is picky about clothes, i.e. dresses good, if she learns to use cosmetics, etc etc, then by the age of 16-18 (when her actual looks are all formed) she is able to find the mixture that makes her beautiful. I see a lot of girls with an actually good face and body, but who look unaqttractive because of what/how they wear, what their hairdo or cosmetics is.
GIRLS! Don't listen to feminists! Your main goal in life should be looking pretty to find a good husband! Don't hesitate on waisting hours goung through fascion magazines and days in shops to achieve it!
I don't think you even can, as from the wording of his post, he wasn't making a case for anything; he was just asking what other people thought.
It's not the court here, you know. It's THERE where the way the words organized may be considered rightful even if it's a complete herecy. Here... The mere asking of those questions in this topic suggests some concern of a speaker, and THAT is nonsence. Because while we talk about censure, he asks questions on vaguely related but mostly "rough" topics. His questions are hardly related to each other and the topic, except of the concept of "underage kids + sexual themes" Yet he asks them as if they ARE strongly related.
Why 18 in the first place?
Don't mind the number. The concern is censure in general, not the limit. Be it 15, 18 or 21 - i think porn shouldn't be censored by laws AT ALL. Actually I believe laws shouldn't touch morality AT ALL, not just porn. Laws should operate crimes and procedures, not morality.