Collaborative Master List of Cock Hero Videos

[book_guy]

I would like to collaborate here at Milovana to create a "master" list of ALL available cock hero and cock hero style videos. All details to be determined.

This is a discussion that stems from a few posts in this thread viewtopic.php?f=25&t=18816

Some other resources are quite good -- the "mapping the cock hero world" thread, viewtopic.php?f=25&t=8393 , for example, is obviously helpful, but it isn't exhaustive, and it intends more to provide links to Milovana (and outside?) resources for downloading the new cock-hero-style videos. I would not suggest that we REPLACE that thread, but the problem with a thread and a forum-post is, that it is rather hard to update in the manner that a regular workplace document (spreadsheet or wordprocessing file) can be updated. You're left having to add on to the end of the thread, addendum after addendum, rather than being in position to keep everything in alphabetical or by-date or by-creator order. Alleviating SOME of those concerns is the by-date listing at cock hero dot info, http://cockhero.info/cockhero-list/ , also very helpful, but people often warn that this website hosts trojan or ransomware so I am hesitant to recommend it.

Can we have a group create a master list? I think the initial creation would be mildly time-consuming, but the eventual document maintenance would be straightforward once it was under way.

1. Scope of project
This is just a list. I don't really envisage anything other than information about the name, contents, and maybe one link to the "original" location of the file. Storage of the videos themselves should not be inside or within this list. The old cock-hero-database project intended to include much more information -- scene descriptions, types of beat meter, names of all porn stars involved or depicted, type of sexual action, type of music, images and screenshots of the action, etc. -- but I think that is beyond what can be done in this present project. Maybe the database project can also be continued, but it didn't seem to have ongoing interest, probably due to the overwhelming size of both (a) the project and (b) the document itself, which contained a lot of thumbnails, links, and screenshots inside the document.
2. Type of participant contribution
Collaborative editing, with several Milovana users given access rights; but not wholly open, with anybody having the right to change it. I can suggest a few "librarian" users here at Milovana who would be good candidates -- some were involved in the previous discussion (linked above, in this post) -- you guys (collectively; the Milovana community) pick and discuss as you see fit.
3. File type
I suggest something rather universal, either a TXT or a CSV. The CSV (comma-separated values) is usually very easy to handle, is read by most spreadsheet programs (Microsoft's Excel, OpenOffice's Calc, and Google Docs's Sheets), and can usually "dump" a save-as straight into plain-text, so I suggest that CSV would be a good initial plan. But if people know something more about charts, spreadsheet, and other collaborative documents like this, then please do share the info.
4. Location
I'm not sure if Google Docs would be the best place, since I haven't ever tried to use any file-sharing service for ANONYMOUS file-changing. There are other locations, but to me, it would be best if it were a site where you log in and change the document right there, on-line, rather than a site where everyone can download a copy of the document, change it at his own home computer, and then upload a new version to the site. That latter arrangement (everyone messes with a copy at home) is bound to create problems. The better way to collaborate is to have one "main" or "central" repository for the one document, to which people (those who have access rights from the "owner" of the document) can add their own changes (and changes generally get "tracked" -- so-and-so typed this new line; so-and-such erased that one) (and changes can have approval requirements -- so-and-so WANTS to add this line, does the owner concur? etc.).

Does anything else need to be mentioned? Is there going to be a problem with this project? I would suggest we talk about it a while ...