Page 1 of 2

Dear boyintights

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:20 pm
by elgoomgnizalb
You know, I've looked over your posting history, and, to be honest, I'm unimpressed.
And you wonder why we say no all the time.
Lemme let you in on a little secret (And I'm even going to use your own words against you!)
boyintights wrote:whining gets me in the most trouble.
And yet, it seems, every month, like clockwork, instead of coming here and asking like a normal person, you feel the need to bitch and moan.
Moan and bitch.
I mean, it's getting to the point where I honestly think that you WANT to be in the condition you are in right now. Why else would you consistently ignore the communities advice to be a more productive member, post topics, maybe a tease, and actually introduce yourself properly.
Instead, you complain. So, pity becomes non existant.

Now, far be it for me to speak for the ladies/mistresses on this site (But I will anyway. Try and stop me. 8-) ), but I think that they would begin rewarding you if you treated them, and the site in general, the way you treat your mistress. It's only common courtesy, afterall. The LEAST you can do for those who hold your orgasm hostage is to be respectful. Curteous.
Grammatical.
But, of course, you are none of these things. And so, no one feels any pressing need, or want, or obligation to give in.
After all, they assume that, if you really did want to end your horrible, pain enducing torment, you would have savvyed up and taken note of their advice.

Which brings me back to my original point. You must just really not want to cum at all, and are only going through the ropes to make it seem like you do.

But, then again, maybe you're a slow learner. So I've found it deep in my heart to give you another chance before I put your polls in the "Always Vote No" category of my life.

You want to cum? Then start becoming a more active member. You've been posting these polls for four months, and yet I still have a higher post count. I'm not exactly an active community member (Then again, I'm not asking them for favours, either, so it's win-win), but I've dealt with these people more than you have.
That's step 1.

Step 2 is rather simple. You should run your posts through a text editor. I mean, I understand that not everyone can write properly (Heck, I even make the most rediculous mistakes sometimes ( :smile: )), but everyone has access to a text editor of some kind. Sloppy grammar is inexcusable at this juncture, I'd think, considering what you want for us.
Cruel? Yes. But, then again, if you'd smartened up earlier and just been overall less brusque in how you treated us, this wouldn't be a factor, now would it?

Step 3 is even simple. Show this post to your mistress. And, if she hasn't seen them, all your past post in these forums. She might be wondering why we haven't said yes yet, and, well, might as well let her curiosity be fulfilled.
She'll probably help you along on the other two steps, too! It's like a bonus!


And that's it.
It's that simple.
You follow these two steps, and you just might find yourself falling into our good graces, and the long anticipated orgasm will be yours!
But, continue to ignore it, and, well... 'fraid t'were not meant to be.

Remember. I'm just doing this for your own good.
'till next poll.

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:11 am
by Evals
I really don't think it's necessary to create a whole entire topic just to bash a guy for his behavior, no matter who the guy and what the reason... You can always send a private message or post in one of the other multitude of topics regarding the matter.

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:25 am
by Bisexual_Boytoy
Evals wrote:I really don't think it's necessary to create a whole entire topic just to bash a guy for his behavior, no matter who the guy and what the reason... (sure thing) You can always send a private message or post in one of the other multitude of topics regarding the matter.
sometimes, calling people out on public grounds is necessary to induce change. we're all adults, i'd hope. i think we can handle conflict without pillowing everything like we're schoolchildren.

this thread is perfectly acceptable in my opinion

i personally find boyintights downright annoying, and wouldn't have written the topic in such a civil manner.

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:55 am
by Evals
Well I can't say I disagree going through his posts with him being kind of annoying at times. I just hope the posters keep it civil. :closedeyes:

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 4:06 pm
by elgoomgnizalb
Well, I did bite my tongue quite a few times.
QUITE a few times.

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:09 am
by camipco
I think elgoomgnizalb is doing boyintights a favor. If I see boyintights make an honest attempt to contribute to the comminuty in some of the ways elgoom suggests, I'll certainly vote yes next time.

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:27 pm
by elgoomgnizalb
camipco wrote:I think elgoomgnizalb is doing boyintights a favor. If I see boyintights make an honest attempt to contribute to the comminuty in some of the ways elgoom suggests, I'll certainly vote yes next time.
This is more or less it.

Of course, that's if boyintights actually visits the forums regularly and sees this before his next poll.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:14 am
by nilcum
Ah the beauty of the Internet and all its trolls.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:32 am
by Makarov
All I have to say is that boyintights needs to renegotiate his cum contract with his Domme. Obviously leaving his ability to cum to such a large number of people was a bad idea.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:33 am
by joeliwan
I don't think that's necessarily true. From all the response he's gotten it seems he could easily earn a winning vote by writing a little bit in the forums and potentially a tease each month.

It seems most of the people here are being pretty reasonable in their expectations of him and for each of the people who's willing to tell him how to get a yes vote there are probably several like me who haven't made their opinion known (at least not recently) who would also vote yes for improved behavior.
Obviously leaving his ability to cum to such a large number of people was a bad idea.
The real problem seems to be that said ability was left to a large number of people that boyintights is either unwilling or unable to be in contact with on a regular basis.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:45 pm
by elgoomgnizalb
nilcum wrote:Ah the beauty of the Internet and all its trolls.

Not entirely sure who you're pointing at here...
Is it me?
did I do something?
I would think someone would tell me. :\'-(

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:48 pm
by joeliwan
elgoomgnizalb wrote:
Not entirely sure who you're pointing at here...
Is it me?
did I do something?
I would think someone would tell me. :\'-(
Well, I can't actually speak for Nilcum (although it'd be cool if i could), but I doubt he was calling you a troll. Seems to me the most trollish one in this particular thread is the one being discussed simply because he doesn't contribute, doesn't have good manners, and only posts when he wants something from the rest of us.

That's just what I thought when I first read that comment. Nilcum can feel free to correct me if I've twisted his words.

~joeliwan

Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:28 am
by boyintights
okay, i think your right. I think your all right.

Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 5:31 am
by camipco
If you'll excuse me a blatently traditionally gendered adage:

It takes a man to admit it
It takes a mensch to fix it

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:20 am
by elgoomgnizalb
boyintights wrote:okay, i think your right. I think your all right.
Alright. Then lets do something about it, eh?

(Damnit. I was stereotypical again...)