Milovana.com

nilcum wrote:Create a SIMPLE easy script language

1#page(
    "Tease Text",
    pic("1.jpg"),
    delay(10sec, 2#)
);

2#page(
    "Tease Text",
    pic("2.jpg"),
    delay(10sec, 3#)
);

This simple example would run a LOT like how milovana has the teases setup -- except there would be no required click through. The continue link would automatically be followed after a delay of x seconds. I've actually already converted all of the content on milovana.com into this format.

From there, things get more slightly advanced, the page linking that some of the teases are having you do manually would be embedded into the program. There would simply be multiple link tags.

Also, sound is a very popular addition on several other tease sites but it is missing from milovana. So, there would be a sound tag as well that will allow the author to specify the beats per minute.

Same thing goes for embedding elements of randomness into the script.

All of this has been done before. I'd like to (with permission) reproduce the content of milovana.com, orgasmdenial.com, cybermistess, pcmistress, and maybe even some of the pay tease sites that now seem to be mostly defunct into this simple scripting language. So, we could all benefit from having centralized content.

Here is where it gets interesting, and quite a bit more advanced. I am into robotics and would love to build an automatic male stroke machine. I would have this communicate with the tease program (tentatively named Tantalus) so the experience could be completely hands off. The goal would be to compile either a kit that the user could buy on their own or an end product that would plug into the program itself. I also have an interest in doing something similar with a TENS unit. That is where the phaser program comes into play.

The theme of computer controlled physical devices continues to other things as well -- think bluetooth handcuffs controlled by the program, whipping attachments... etc. I don't see getting this far but it is a nice end goal. Safety is an important consideration during all of this.

Also, in order to meet these end goals I think I would have to break out of the limitations of a web browser and actually distribute a real client. Something that is downloaded and executed.

Anyway, I'm just wanting to gauge interest. Is anyone else as excited by these ideas as I am?



a hybrid of Cybermistress, milovana, and phaser

RoniDev wrote:well you really should use xml, cause you already have a language to define everything and its called xml, thats why xml was made in the first place.

var numberOfEdges = 0;
while (numberOfEdges < 5) {
   page("Keep at it");
}

seraph0x wrote:Try expressing this JavaScript snippet in XML:

Code: Select all

var numberOfEdges = 0;
while (numberOfEdges < 5) {
   page("Keep at it");
}

Note: This does not actually work in the FlashTease viewer yet, but something like that can and will be implemented.

<edges>
  <count>5</count>
  <instruction>Keep at it</instruction>
</edges>

RoniDev wrote:

Code: Select all

<edges>
  <count>5</count>
  <instruction>Keep at it</instruction>
</edges>

var edges = 5;
while (edges > 0)
{
  edges = edges - 1;
  if (random(100) < 50)
    if(ask("Want more?"))
      edges = edges + 5;
  page("Keep at it!");
}

RoniDev wrote:<edges>

RoniDev wrote:Its all about the softwere which reads and interprets the xml file afterwards.

mae0314 wrote: Now try something like this:

Code: Select all

var edges = 5;
while (edges > 0)
{
  edges = edges - 1;
  if (random(100) < 50)
    if(ask("Want more?"))
      edges = edges + 5;
  page("Keep at it!");
}

<edges>
  <count>5</count>
  <random>
      <chance>50</chance>
      <decision>
         <text>Want more?</text>
         <yes><count><increase>5</increase></count></yes>
         <no></no>
      </decision>
  </random>
  <text>Keep at it</text>
</edges>

seraph0x wrote:And just think about how simple an example this was. mae0314 hits the nail on the head: You're gonna run into a complexity nightmare here. (Or end up with pretty limited functionality.)

seraph0x wrote:

Code: Select all

1#page(
    "Tease Text",
    pic("1.jpg"),
    delay(10sec, 2#)
);

2#page(
    "Tease Text",
    pic("2.jpg"),
    delay(10sec, 3#)
);

seraph0x wrote: I was thinking the same thing. To be precise: I wrote a little script that shows our regular teases in the FlashTease viewer, so that users would have options like viewing them in a slide show, etc. But I'm not exactly sure how the final thing is going to look

seraph0x wrote: Ok, this is probably the core part of this post: What I see in the BDSM software area is too many solo fighters and too few team efforts. While I appreciate the challenge of competition, sometimes I wonder how much further we would already have come if all those people contacting me with their ambitious concepts for teasing programs, girlfriend simulators and whatnot would have joined our Team instead. If you choose to go solo, let me know and we'll support you wherever we can. But please at least consider joining us instead.

seraph0x wrote: Hands-off stroking is quite the engineering challenge.

seraph0x wrote: I think it's too early to say how the technology will reach the consumer. At this point we are only compiling ideas. The end result might be an assortment of independent toys, a box with slots to plug different toy modules into or even a highly integrated solution for a broader market. But that is a decision that should be made much later (after working prototypes for all ideas have been built for example.)

A USB controlled electromagnet taped to the roof holding the key out of reach. (Although it has it's quirks, too.)

Whipping attachments: There are only two electronic whip designs to my knowledge that ever made it to market. One was called RoboSpanker or something and was too large and expensive for our purposes. The other was called Painstation, which is much closer to what we would design as Milovana. It was a tiny box featuring a whip, electroshocks and heat. It was used to spice up a round of Pong.

Yes, we were thinking of a daemon the user could install that would open up toy control on a local HTTP socket... then all we would need to do in the FlashTease viewer is request URLs like
http://localhost:38493/vibrator?speed=30 or whatever. This would make the client incredibly lightweight and potentially very modular.


So your project relies on web images?

I agree, the robotics part would be - at least now - refreshing, although there's a project in the CyberMistress community with a USB Vibrator.

You should realize that this is already a relatively small market, and I wonder how many of the members actually have such robotic equipments or how many would want to invest in them.

RoniDev wrote:well there is always some code you cannot interpret... if you want that then you would have to create your own "tease-language". You could call it T++ ;)

So all you have to do is to add something.

Code: Select all

<edges>
  <count>5</count>
  <random>
      <chance>50</chance>
      <decision>
         <text>Want more?</text>
         <yes><count><increase>5</increase></count></yes>
         <no></no>
      </decision>
  </random>
  <text>Keep at it</text>
</edges>