Page 1 of 1

FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:05 am
by SexualChoc
http://www.milovana.com/webteases/showt ... p?id=18806

is the tease

well it is getting a very low rating apparently people do not understand WHY it's being posted!

seems Many people do NOT
KNOW OR RESPECT the rules of this site! :unsure:

or the chat room! :-/


the quiz is not just on this tease
but every time you access this site
or log into forum
or access chat...

It helps to know the rules
as they are stated
and what is and is not allowed. :book:

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:01 am
by tBone
One day, you might stop line breaking in the middle of your sentences and I'll be able to read something you type. Heh.

[Edit] I went out of my way to downvote that "tease".

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:06 am
by someone43
Your intent is understood; however there is a section for the rules just as there is for soliciting for a dom in the forum. The "rules instructional" was posted in the tease section, and I'm fairly glad most people are rating in the same vein as I am which is as a tease (which it is not).

That being said, more people should read the chat code of conduct before they enter and if they don't they should be ignored (the chat feature, not just not reading what they say).

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:01 am
by Tury
Oh, Chocolate...

They can insult you, they can troll you, they can even break you temporarily by way of an over-saturation of terrible teases, but they just can't stop you can they? You're like the Batman of Milovana. Will the struggle ever end? Who knows. But you keep going because we need you to.

Much respect.

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:01 am
by les

I would of liked two or more girls taking turns telling the rules in smaller chunks.
The the brain would remember the rules more easily by association.

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:46 am
by SexualChoc
Tury wrote:Oh, Chocolate...

They can insult you, they can troll you, they can even break you temporarily by way of an over-saturation of terrible teases, but they just can't stop you can they? You're like the Batman of Milovana. Will the struggle ever end? Who knows. But you keep going because we need you to.

Much respect.
:blush:


Awww...thanks.. :blush:

yeah I will publish something more fun next time...

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:51 am
by SexualChoc
Capelaw wrote:I have to agree with some of the other posters. The intention is worthy, for sure, but it's a bit of a stretch to call it a tease. And nobody likes to find that something purporting to be a tease is in fact anything but, so I'm afraid you can expect low ratings.

As I said, the intention is worthy, even if (imho) it's in the wrong part of the site. What might also help is to post the terms and conditions more in a "plain language" form, rather than simply copying and pasting the legalese. People don't read these things because it's often a struggle to wade through the reams of fine print. It's true on most websites which require T&C.

So...good try, SC. But I don't like the way you've gone about it. Sorry :)

I am GLAD you do not like it!!
hehe ( okay let me rephrase.. you are welcome to not like it)

I have never done teases for approval ratings!! or positive feedback

heck one of my teases still holds the record for number of negative threads!!
3 separate forum threads over 2 months!!
my Classical art tease!! (still surprised that has a high a rating as it got)


if you look you will also see I did the tease: AD me!
that was also "educational"
so this is my second tease of this type!!


now did you actually read the rules did you notice anything ... interesting in them?
I could tell you what gems are hidden in there...
it is So tempting..
but then how will you be able to answer questions? that are asked of you?
if you don't learn it?

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:22 pm
by janmb
SexualChoc wrote:seems Many people do NOT
KNOW OR RESPECT the rules of this site! :unsure:

or the chat room! :-/
The "tease" doesn't get low scores because people have a problem with the rules... It gets low scores because instead of finding a tease, they instead find a copy&pasted CoC/ToS.

Nothing wrong with posting a non-tease nor getting low rank imo.

You might consider making it more apparent in the name of the tease that it is in fact not a tease, but other than that it is a sound idea.

Another improvement suggestion: Post short, easy to understand versions of the main points of the rules, rather than simply copy&pasting the heavy, legal stuff no one ever bothers reading anyway. That is already perfectly accessible from the rules section. To bring something new to the table, and possibly make a difference, the "tease" would do better to give a short overview in a simple language rather than the massive text.

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:18 pm
by tBone
Tury wrote:Oh, Chocolate...

They can insult you, they can troll you, they can even break you temporarily by way of an over-saturation of terrible teases, but they just can't stop you can they? You're like the Batman of Milovana. Will the struggle ever end? Who knows. But you keep going because we need you to.

Much respect.
No. He is not the Batman of Milovana.
Not even close. Not even a little. He is like a spiritual healer trying to cure cancer. Sure his intentions might be good, but his methods are crap. Not to mention his grammar. I don't understand why people tolerate or even promote his ruthlessly horrible grammar.

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:52 pm
by Dream_On
As other people have said those looking for a tease are bound to be disappointed by finding the rules of the site copied and pasted into it. People looking for a source of quick, horny frustration aren't going to want to have to wade through all of that, especially the ones that do follow the rules of the site already. I'm fairly certain many people quit reading once they got to the rules and either closed the tab or speed clicked to the end of the "tease".

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 10:55 pm
by SexualChoc
:o)

is it art?

do people know the founding documents of there country.
like in the usa many people do not know the constitution.

as for Copy and pasting
I did that for a reason.

I do not think
any part should be "abbreviated"
because then I could be accused of mis-interpreting things...

maybe people do Not want to know...
maybe it is because I am now working in education..
as someone familiar with how people are NOT told information
in order to make sure that there voice is not heard...
or allowing them to be marginalized..
add the group of your choice here...
(the list is rather long)

as for a tease this is Not the first "tease" that I have written that has no sexual content
I go with what inspires me.

I thank you all for your feedback both negetive.. and positive.
that is what this site is about..
but.. you might have to read the rules to know that!! :lol:

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:58 pm
by sub3604
as for Copy and pasting
I did that for a reason. I do not think any part should be "abbreviated" because then I could be accused of mis-interpreting things.
Put in plain English people would have read what you had to say copying and pasting was just lazy and guaranteed no one would read it. Have you even read all the terms and conditions now be honest. If you are incapable of posting accurate plain English rules perhaps this is a sign the rules are too much legal rubbish and a good indicator of why people don't read them.

Re: FB.. Da Rules

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:42 am
by tBone
sub3604 wrote:
as for Copy and pasting
I did that for a reason. I do not think any part should be "abbreviated" because then I could be accused of mis-interpreting things.
Put in plain English people would have read what you had to say copying and pasting was just lazy and guaranteed no one would read it. Have you even read all the terms and conditions now be honest. If you are incapable of posting accurate plain English rules perhaps this is a sign the rules are too much legal rubbish and a good indicator of why people don't read them.
I honestly dont think he speaks English at this point.
I am pretty sure he just runs everything through a translator and hopes for the best.