Page 1 of 1
FB Programed Response
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:08 pm
by computergeek
Sep 15, 2012
I totally screwed up and accidentally overwrote the script. I put in a request for a restore from backup so hopefully it will be back on line again.
Jul 20, 2012
Programed Response
http://www.milovana.com/webteases/showf ... p?id=17427
While I have played with my own little programs of sorts, this is my first time to publish anything like this for others to see. This is directed more at those men that are not submissive but I tried to make it all inclusive. Positive feedback on this one please.
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:12 am
by tBone
Can't read because of font. Fancy font can be fun at times, but it is far too irritating and distracting to try to read and follow instructions.
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:47 am
by computergeek
tBone wrote:Can't read because of font. Fancy font can be fun at times, but it is far too irritating and distracting to try to read and follow instructions.
I know what you are saying but I do not know yet, I am torn on this subject. Since it is text and not audio and attempting to sometimes portray a sweet or even submissive woman the scroll like text helps. Kind of playing and planning on seeing different font and color to help set mood, or to identify different girls. Maybe adding bold text might help to make it easier to read?
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:34 pm
by tBone
Colors are more than enough. All fancy text does is to cause people to focus on the text, instead of the tease. Distractions are no fun.
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:36 pm
by meson1
@computergeek.
I am in the process of pulling this tease down for TeaseMe. I've managed to workaround the problems importing the script.
However, now I'm trying to locate higher res versions of the images, but it's proving hard to track any down. So far, out of the 43 images in the tease, I've managed to find 'HD' versions of only 18 of them.
I don't suppose you have you have high res 'originals' of this particular picture set, do you?
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:24 am
by computergeek
meson1 wrote:@computergeek.
I am in the process of pulling this tease down for TeaseMe. I've managed to workaround the problems importing the script.
However, now I'm trying to locate higher res versions of the images, but it's proving hard to track any down. So far, out of the 43 images in the tease, I've managed to find 'HD' versions of only 18 of them.
I don't suppose you have you have high res 'originals' of this particular picture set, do you?
@meson1: Originals? At first I was thinking the other tease, damn. I will have to look around, I have them somewhere but not local on this computer.
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:57 pm
by computergeek
I hope it is ok to post them here like this. I do not have the correct file names from the script but I am certain you should be able to figure it out.
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:00 am
by computergeek
deleted
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:03 am
by computergeek
deleted
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:05 am
by computergeek
deleted
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:17 am
by meson1
Okay. I've grabbed them. Thanks.
It might be as well to remove the pics from your posts in this thread now, so that you're not spoiling it for anyone that wants to go play Programmed Response.
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:10 pm
by computergeek
meson1 wrote:Okay. I've grabbed them. Thanks.
It might be as well to remove the pics from your posts in this thread now, so that you're not spoiling it for anyone that wants to go play Programmed Response.
Not sure if that was all the files or not, let me know if you are still missing any
Re: FB Programed Response
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:06 pm
by meson1
There were 43 pics in the original tease. You posted 24 in this thread. Of those 24, many were the same size as in the flashtease. Some were larger.
So now I have 23 pics from yourself and other sources that are larger than the original flashtease. The best thing would be to list them all. So here is where we stand so far:
Code: Select all
[b]pic from flashtease from computergeek 'hd' collected[/b]pr0001.jpg 322x500 322x500 660x1024pr0002.jpg 322x500 322x500 -pr0003.jpg 322x500 322x500 660x1024pr0004.jpg 322x500 322x500 -pr0005.jpg 322x500 322x500 -pr0006.jpg 322x500 322x500 660x1024pr0007.jpg 322x500 322x500 660x1024pr0010.jpg 775x500 1024x660 1024x660pr0011.jpg 775x500 1024x660 1024x660pr0020.jpg 775x500 1024x660 1024x660pr0021.jpg 322x500 660x1024 660x1024pr0022.jpg 322x500 660x1024 660x1024pr0023.jpg 322x500 322x500 -pr0024.jpg 333x500 333x500 -pr0025.jpg 322x500 660x1024 660x1024pr0026.jpg 322x500 - 660x1024pr0027.jpg 322x500 - 660x1024pr0028.jpg 322x500 - -pr0029.jpg 322x500 - -pr0030.jpg 322x500 - 660x1024pr0040.jpg 775x500 - -pr0041.jpg 775x500 - -pr0042.jpg 775x500 - -pr0043.jpg 775x500 - -pr0044.jpg 775x500 - 900x580pr0050.jpg 500x333 500x333 1024x683pr0051.jpg 322x500 322x500 660x1024pr0052.jpg 322x500 660x1024 660x1024pr0053.jpg 322x500 322x500 660x1024pr0054.jpg 322x500 322x500 -pr0055.jpg 322x500 660x1024 660x1024pr0056.jpg 333x500 333x500 -pr0100.jpg 322x500 - 660x1024pr0101.jpg 775x500 - -pr0102.jpg 322x500 - 660x1024pr0103.jpg 775x500 - -pr0104.jpg 775x500 - -pr0105.jpg 775x500 - 1024x660pr0106.jpg 775x500 - -pr0107.jpg 775x500 - -pr1000.jpg 775x500 1024x660 1024x660pr1001.jpg 775x500 - -pr2001.jpg 775x500 - -