Milovana.com

I have noticed a large number of teases sub titled "classic"

Are these reposts or reworked.

Owing to present cir_cum_stances I have not had the opportunity to evaluate them

Les

lesub wrote:I have noticed a large number of teases sub titled "classic"

Are these reposts or reworked.

The ones I did have notes on the first page that tell the extent of how much they were reworked. On the whole, they didn't change much, but I did edit for English and clarity, and changed pictures in the coed-cockteasers series of teases.

I think most are direct copies of the originals (since the classic archive dissapeared people have be re-posting them).
I think in a few of cactusman's the pictures have changed (not sure how much i havent compared them to the originals)
Ive posted a few and in most cases Ive made slight changes to the text where there were errors.
Also Ive made one into a flashtease, which it wasnt originally.


check this thread http://www.milovana.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5277

EDIT: oh didnt see cactusmans reply

Not sure if the previous two answers answered your question. If not, this extra info should fill in the gap:

Once upon a time, OrgasmDenial.com allowed users to make web teases, similar to the basic teases on Milovana. They then stopped and the teases were lost to everyone, except for those far-sighted and paranoid perverts who had downloaded them all. For a while Milovana was hosting a copy of them, and they were called "Classic" teases and were hosted here but weren't part of Milovana's teases.... they were more like a bunch of static web pages that were uploaded, separate from Milovana's database of teases that users could author, vote on, mark as favorites, etc.

I just realised, by reading this topic, that the classic section of milovana was gone. was it a copyright issue? because it was a big plus to the website.

EternalLust wrote:I just realised, by reading this topic, that the classic section of milovana was gone. was it a copyright issue? because it was a big plus to the website.

I think it was a copyright/DMCA issue. However, much as i think the admins here are wonderful and doing a great job, I'm sure the admins will never admit that's the reason for taking the classics down, because it puts them in a bad legal position, having presented all those classics for years without permission...

cactusman wrote:I'm sure the admins will never admit that's the reason for taking the classics down, because it puts them in a bad legal position

LOL this just reminds me lots of real life situation. I've wetnesssed lately lots of not admited error, and issues let in the darkness. But at least here it was for a good cause.

@Camel,

You made me realize we have been around here for a really long time. LOL

Happy teasing,

rbtheservant wrote:@Camel,

You made me realize we have been around here for a really long time. LOL

Happy teasing,

That makes me a newbie?