Very minor suggestion...
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:38 pm
I vote on pretty much every tease I finish... AND
We milovanians are a pretty accepting and encouraging bunch...
However.
Some teases are so bad -- or have poor enough spelling and grammar skills -- that I cannot bring myself to actually click through the tease to reach the voting page, where I can give it the "1" I feel it deserves -- especially if one the tags is "long tease". Perhaps we might be able to rate a tease at any ambiguous point during the tease itself? Or perhaps on the main webteases page?
Just a thought... Not a nice one, but there it is.
In a related question, how are the view counts calculated? Is it the number of people who have opened the first page of the tease, or the last page? If we're squeamish about offending someone by allowing votes before the tease is completed, maybe we should make sure the "viewed" count reflects those who finish the tease rather than those who start it?
We milovanians are a pretty accepting and encouraging bunch...
However.
Some teases are so bad -- or have poor enough spelling and grammar skills -- that I cannot bring myself to actually click through the tease to reach the voting page, where I can give it the "1" I feel it deserves -- especially if one the tags is "long tease". Perhaps we might be able to rate a tease at any ambiguous point during the tease itself? Or perhaps on the main webteases page?
Just a thought... Not a nice one, but there it is.
In a related question, how are the view counts calculated? Is it the number of people who have opened the first page of the tease, or the last page? If we're squeamish about offending someone by allowing votes before the tease is completed, maybe we should make sure the "viewed" count reflects those who finish the tease rather than those who start it?