Page 1 of 1

an extension of my last topic

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:42 pm
by Miss_Lisa
as many of you know i advertised for boys to be denied by me a while a go. i had loads of applicants but to be honest they were all rubbish, so this time i'm gunna be a little more specialised.

any boys who fancy dabbling in lite financial domination send me a pm with your e-mail address on it,

kisses,
Lisa x x

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:18 am
by TheGraduate
Miss_Lisa wrote:as many of you know i advertised for boys to be denied by me a while a go. i had loads of applicants but to be honest they were all rubbish, so this time i'm gunna be a little more specialised.

any boys who fancy dabbling in lite financial domination send me a pm with your e-mail address on it,

kisses,
Lisa x x
Niiiice.

Rubbish = "unwilling to give me money"

So now you're gonna be straight with us because your first ploy didn't work. You're as bad as the guys who come here begging for a mistress, you're just a woman begging for money instead.

There's well done financial domination pitches, and then there's.... well, this.

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:44 am
by dark
Ok I lean back in my chair and wait what will happen in this thread :lol:

I only ask for one thing: Be respectful and no insultings, please. Thanks :-)

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:52 am
by blue_down_under
Miss_Lisa wrote:as many of you know i advertised for boys to be denied by me a while a go. i had loads of applicants but to be honest they were all rubbish, so this time i'm gunna be a little more specialised.

any boys who fancy dabbling in lite financial domination send me a pm with your e-mail address on it,

kisses,
Lisa x x

This is so poorly composed I actually feel sorry for you. What happened? Did Daddy cut off your trust fund?

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:54 am
by dark
blue_down_under wrote:
Miss_Lisa wrote:as many of you know i advertised for boys to be denied by me a while a go. i had loads of applicants but to be honest they were all rubbish, so this time i'm gunna be a little more specialised.

any boys who fancy dabbling in lite financial domination send me a pm with your e-mail address on it,

kisses,
Lisa x x

This is so poorly composed I actually feel sorry for you. What happened? Did Daddy cut off your trust fund?
Very respectful :-|

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:15 pm
by Miss_Lisa
I wasn't aware exotic composition was a prerequisite of posting in these forums and no, 'daddy' didn't cut off my trust fund. If you must know there was no trust fund.

The reason for making it a little more specialised is that all i recieved was boys wanting a quick fix on a friday night. The thrill for me is in controlling a boy for a substantial amount not just watching him masturbate in front of me. I was hoping a little fincancial domination would actually split the short-term, cam-hungry, one night losers from the boys who actually want long term denial. Instead it just recieved responses from those clearly not into this situation.

Rubbish, does not equal unwilling to give money, it instead means an unwillingness to commit. Anyone that has ever told me they will commit has done 2 or 3 days then after a period of not hearing from them i find out they have failed and want to be trained from the start again. All they had to do was not touch without me but instead they like 3 days of denial then they run off and release it all.

I hope this will take compositional superiority over my last, slated post.

Lisa x x x

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:11 pm
by dark
I understand you Miss Lisa. But I heard from other dommes experiences that demanding money is also not a guarantee to get one of the "good guys". Often it is even the opposite. If guys pay for it they understand it more as a service without any duties.

For my understanding of general BDSM, money shouldn't be involved and a lot of subs feel insulted, because they feel like somebody wants to make money with their deepest desire. I mean I am already pissed when I see people who copy music or even whole subcultures for money just for selling it without a soul in the "charts". It's commercial bullshit and abusive. Now imagine how a true submissive man feels when he reads about financial slavery. He needs to be very tolerant to not feel insulted. I learned to handle it and to accept it. Still I understand both sides. The Mistress who wants a loyal servant and the Submissive who feels insulted and abused (this time abused not in a good way).

Unfortunately a lot of submissive men don't appreciate the privilige. Yes it is a privilige and you are not the first woman who made bad experiences.

Good luck, I really hope you'll find someone :-)

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:31 pm
by subman1_99
I think this one will run for a while, it has the potential to become very complex. I agree with almost everything those who have contributed thus far have said.
I have sympathy for where Miss Lisa is coming from as there are, without any doubt, a lot of timewasters out there and it would appear that she has encountered a few.
I have paid for sessions with 'online Mistress's' before and for the most part enjoyed the experience, the main problem that I have, as a UK resident, is fitting in with US timezones, it can be difficult for me to be online at a time convenient to a person on the other side of the planet.
I have also seen adverts for 'financial domination' , thats just not my thing, I might want to purchase a small gift for someone I had got to know and enjoyed playing with online but just handing over cash does nothing for me and I can't help thinking that some folks get taken advantage of but that is their problem/issue.
I don't know how you get around this one, Miss Lisa, for what it's worth I think you will need to find a balance between convincing potential subs you are not just after their cash and of course they will have to convince you that they are not just wasting your time.
One idea would be asking a potential sub to write you an 'essay' on a topic of your choice, say 3000 words, before you have any contact with them, this might weed out the 'one night losers'. Small gifts etc might come into the equation later.
And if you are in a compatible timezone I might be willing to give it a go.
Best wishes.

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:39 pm
by dark
I absolutely agree with subman. I think you can easily test the loyality without any money exchanges. It's really more secure to want an essay like submansuggested or just another proof like sending him buying a pair of panties if he has never done it. The options are endless :innocent:

You will find out pretty fast if he is honest, loyal and obedient and if you both match together. There are really more effective ways to find out more than money. BUT even if you just like to have both, getting paid and having a servant it's fine by me. The financial slaves are adults and they have to take responsibility about their actions.

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:51 pm
by Alison
Miss Lisa,

Milovana isn't really a good place to find humans seeking Financial Domination and Denial for funds... The site itself offers only free teases.

Max Fisch is good for finding online possibilities: www.maxfisch.com

I actually do in person sessions, and *I* don't even post about them here. (In case you didn't know, I'm the person who is building the URGE on Milovana... look up, and select URGE, and you'll see that I spend a lot of time working on this site.)

Something that may be useful to use is to check out my domme site... because on the side there is a list of my link exchanges- which is where I post about what I do: http://novacaine.sensualwriter.com This may help you figure out where you should post.

Good luck!

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:04 am
by Forevergallant
Well, having been one of those who was teased online by Miss Lisa, though only once, I can honestly say that she didn't seem in it for the money. For my part Miss Lisa, I dont think I was, rubbish as you put it, but then again, we didn't talk after the first time. (I admittedly wasnt able to do as was requested in full the first time)

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:29 am
by all2true
I think for me it’s the word: Financial
I mean if I want someone to 'control' my check book and balance my bills
pay on my rent, utilities, ect.

Is this like, a service where you help bail me out of trouble if I am spending too much?
That kind of domination?
(bit of sarcasm there)

I personally don’t pay for sex, period.
If this was a paid site, I would not be on it.

PS. After all the problems in the USA with overspent households
Even I would be tempted if your willing to help me balance my expenses.

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:37 pm
by Miss_Lisa
Thankyou for the advice alison.

xx

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:14 pm
by littlepos
In the immortal words of my Grandfather, George Burns, Willie Nelson and the guy who used to be married to Lorena Bobbitt, sex aint never free, you always pay for it one way or another.

Re: an extension of my last topic

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:47 am
by texturedshroom
If you're advertising a paid product don't you think you'd be better off posting it here?