Page 1 of 1

Converting funscripts to Estim

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 4:10 pm
by JakofClubs
I was using the converter at https://cfs6t08p.github.io/funstim/funstim.html
To convert a funscript that I paid $2.50 for from RealSyn.com for NumberOneFan's Cock Hero Angle Anjelica but it ended up with large portions of silence. One chuck of silence is 30 minutes. I've used the converter before and it "just worked". I tried a couple of different setting for Frequency that I had used successfully before. I assume it's a problem with the funscript and there's nothing I can do about it; but I thought I'd ask.
Spoiler: show
conversion_fail.png
conversion_fail.png (81.35 KiB) Viewed 1210 times
Edit:
From: https://discuss.eroscripts.com/t/rs-num ... elica/6888
Original post: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=22593

Re: Converting funscripts to Estim

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 4:30 pm
by LondonGent
If you want to PM me the funscript I'll check whether I can see any problems with it

Re: Converting funscripts to Estim

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:29 pm
by LondonGent
Bad news - It looks like your estim matches what's in the funscript file to me:
Numberonefan-Cock_Hero-Angel_Anjelica.png
Numberonefan-Cock_Hero-Angel_Anjelica.png (7.18 KiB) Viewed 1095 times
I'm downloading the video itself at the moment. Will take a deeper look over the weekend and see if there is anything I can do to patch it up.

Re: Converting funscripts to Estim

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 9:06 am
by LondonGent
I've compared the funscript to the video and it's not really the fault of the original scripter to be honest. Without giving too much away in spoilers, the video includes long sections where you're supposed to be doing actions other than stroking. The scripter has left these blank intentionally, though whether you'd prefer these to be filled with some form of strokes instead of switching to manual stimulation is a matter of personal taste.

Re: Converting funscripts to Estim

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:51 pm
by JakofClubs
LondonGent wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 9:06 am I've compared the funscript to the video and it's not really the fault of the original scripter to be honest. Without giving too much away in spoilers, the video includes long sections where you're supposed to be doing actions other than stroking. The scripter has left these blank intentionally, though whether you'd prefer these to be filled with some form of strokes instead of switching to manual stimulation is a matter of personal taste.
Thanks for looking into it. I guess this video isn't that suitable for estim.