Milovana.com

Hi all,

So far I've been only reading the forum but have any of you seen the work from this user?

https://www.pornhub.com/users/chmachine

His device seems simple to construct but I am not sure how it's being controlled.

Yeah, the control interface would certainly be interesting to learn more about there. The precision/timing looks better than anything I've seen to date.

Not sure if the exact same setup, but think so... Check this channel out...

https://youtu.be/xa2ukRw6fzA


http://cockheromachine.blogspot.com/2017/

About the blog post, they refer to these little motors:


I bought quite a few of those, and they fail after a few hours running, very disappointing. If you are bothered by the failure rate of standard incandescent light bulbs, the little motor failure rate will infuriate you to no end.

janmb wrote: Wed Aug 15, 2018 4:02 pm Not sure if the exact same setup, but think so... Check this channel out...

https://youtu.be/xa2ukRw6fzA
http://cockheromachine.blogspot.com/2017/

I also think he is the one, thanks for sharing!

A Venus 2000 would be the ideal device to use

wangchungass wrote: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:19 pm A Venus 2000 would be the ideal device to use

Wow, that’s some expensive hardware. Definitely in a whole other league lol. I’m actually tempted to try out the CHMachine. I’ll have to think on it, but I enjoy the idea of playing CH a way in which I don’t control the strength of grip and such. I’m pretty sure I do that unconsciously to make sure I last the duration. Taking that away could conceivably make it more intense.

Oh! I didn't know about the Venus 2000... It seems like a good idea at first, but I'm so not sure that it's that good an idea to mess with veins and arteries pressure.

This seems to be the perfect device for me:
https://de.pornhub.com/view_video.php?v ... 8a00cf0f8f

http://www.robotsexmachine.com

edgefan wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:45 am This seems to be the perfect device for me:
https://de.pornhub.com/view_video.php?v ... 8a00cf0f8f

http://www.robotsexmachine.com

Yeah, that does seem like a better option than the Venus 2000. But also still an option I am way too poor to afford.

Hmmm... I actually have a Tremblr which is like a Venus 2000. I actually created my own internal PCB so I could control it fully with things like the PC / Arduino / Rasp Pi etc. I dislike the remote provided.

The only issue would be that you would need to "read ahead" so to speak on the upcoming strokes, so you know how much power to send to the motor. I'm tired so I could be talking out my but it may be possible. Maybe if I have a little time I may experiment.

modnar wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:34 pm The only issue would be that you would need to "read ahead" so to speak on the upcoming strokes

Indeed, motor+pump+air does have a much slower reaction time than pure electricity. Interesting! A temporary work around that I can think of would be to duplicate the audio track (or only its beats) in a separate file. Then, click PlayPump, followed by a click to PlayVideo.

doremi wrote: Sun Aug 19, 2018 2:38 am Indeed, motor+pump+air does have a much slower reaction time than pure electricity. Interesting! A temporary work around that I can think of would be to duplicate the audio track (or only its beats) in a separate file. Then, click PlayPump, followed by a click to PlayVideo.

You don't need to do that, just screen shot the beat before it hits the center in the CHMachine program. It might take a few tries to get it lined up, but you should be able to offset the delay of the motor+pump+air.