Milovana.com

I've seen a few videos of this kind of thing on various streaming sites, and it hit me that since I'm on such an active community, I should rally the troops!

I propose picking one picture (maybe once a week, to keep it special) for each participant to print off and paste. Of course, it'd be great if we could all record ourselves in action, but for those who are conscious of privacy or maybe just don't have a camera - how about a photo?

Take a good photo of the painted picture and post it in this thread. That way we can see how each guy chooses to aim on a particularly hot girl, or who worked up the biggest load and saturated her!

Hell, we could make it a competition and have a vote if anyone's interested

Right, well I'm not gonna fap off onto a picture and put it up here if no one else is going to, but I will if there's interest! So I'm just putting this out to see if anyone's interested.

To get things started, who'd like to cum on this photo of Keeley and share it with us?

I'm game if you are!! Just say the word and we can begin!

56 lurking views and not a single response. I'm pissed.

I hope that there are some users with a spine out there who'll pipe up!

Well...its a new concept to me, but seems like a good idea! What could go wrong?

I would need to work up a nice load first, I think you could rally the troops more if you posted a spunky pic to begin with!

This could be as good as the 'how big is your cock for real' thread. That was some amusing reading!

I'm gonna get on board for the big win. Count me in!

We dont have to scan them do we? My scanner is already fucked!

cumhardy wrote:Well...its a new concept to me, but seems like a good idea! What could go wrong?

I would need to work up a nice load first, I think you could rally the troops more if you posted a spunky pic to begin with!

This could be as good as the 'how big is your cock for real' thread. That was some amusing reading!

I'm gonna get on board for the big win. Count me in!

We dont have to scan them do we? My scanner is already fucked!

I don't think scanning will be necessary. Just a picture of the picture

Now isn't the opportune moment, but when I can, I'll get a picture up ASAP! If anyone wants to start, go ahead - paint Keeley!

I remember seeing an entire blog dedicated to this stuff...all I have to say is that I don't really want to see hot women in photographs covered with cum. The very idea is kind of creepy, you find a girl you have a fascination with, print out the picture, cum on the picture and then take a picture of the cum stained picture.

All that said, if there's people interested enough to continue the thread, then by all means. I don't want to stand in your way of your...in my eyes...creepiness.

Or to be more politically correct, just because I don't like it doesn't mean I should hold anybody back. Proceed as you wish, if you wish.

P.S.

Ewww.

P.P.S.

Keeley's hot.

Hmm, well I don't wanna disturb people . . .

How about just dripping pre-cum on her? Wonderful torture...and Keeley is definitely worthy!

Hmm. This is interesting, as it's the complete opposite of what i'm used to seeing from guys on this forum. Normally most everyone is so submissive in nature as to never dare dream of using a woman as a tool for arousal without her knowledge or consent. I get multiple PM's a day asking, "I got aroused by something you wrote, is it ok to touch myself?" and other things along those lines. I understand that a lot of this is an attempt at involvement, but even still the general nature of guys here is quite contrary to what i'm seeing here now.

I'm also a bit shocked that it almost bothers me a bit. I consider myself pretty unoffendable, but I suppose it bothers me in the sense that I feel like I should be protecting the girl in the picture, as she may not be the kind of person that would like this if she knew about it. My first reaction is to spare her by finding a picture of a girl that I know wouldn't mind, and submitting it for this. I suppose that would have to be a picture of me.

I'll think about this. But I felt compelled to input something.

-L

Lindsey wrote:Hmm. This is interesting, as it's the complete opposite of what i'm used to seeing from guys on this forum. Normally most everyone is so submissive in nature as to never dare dream of using a woman as a tool for arousal without her knowledge or consent.

It is interesting, on a site largely designed around taking pictures of girls and building teases around them, that this further use of an image seems to be pushing people's buttons. On the one hand I can see this being sort of the same thing taken to a slightly different place (who knows how the various models would feel about the words being put in their mouths), on the other I have to admit I fall in the slightly uncomfortable camp.

On the plus side, Milovana has survived plenty of content that is not everyone's cup of tea, so I hope anyone who was interested in this doesn't get too discouraged.

drawn wrote:

Lindsey wrote:Hmm. This is interesting, as it's the complete opposite of what i'm used to seeing from guys on this forum. Normally most everyone is so submissive in nature as to never dare dream of using a woman as a tool for arousal without her knowledge or consent.

It is interesting, on a site largely designed around taking pictures of girls and building teases around them, that this further use of an image seems to be pushing people's buttons. On the one hand I can see this being sort of the same thing taken to a slightly different place (who knows how the various models would feel about the words being put in their mouths), on the other I have to admit I fall in the slightly uncomfortable camp.

On the plus side, Milovana has survived plenty of content that is not everyone's cup of tea, so I hope anyone who was interested in this doesn't get too discouraged.

I agree. It is upsetting me, maybe irrationally. But I don't want to make an issue of it. Later on today i'm going to post up a picture of myself, and there will be a few rules to go along with it. Anyone who would like to participate will have to earn the privilege of gawking at my body while they touch themselves, and pushing themselves over the edge and releasing an orgasm on a picture of me. The task(s) won't be too difficult though, no worries there. ;)

-L

Lindsey wrote:Hmm. This is interesting, as it's the complete opposite of what i'm used to seeing from guys on this forum. Normally most everyone is so submissive in nature as to never dare dream of using a woman as a tool for arousal without her knowledge or consent. I get multiple PM's a day asking, "I got aroused by something you wrote, is it ok to touch myself?" and other things along those lines. I understand that a lot of this is an attempt at involvement, but even still the general nature of guys here is quite contrary to what i'm seeing here now.

-L

You're point is well founded and warrants discussion. In my mind it was an act of worship or admiration. I imagined her encouraging me to continue...but not allowing me to cum completely while she enjoyed my obedience to hold off for her pleasure. I suppose I may have missed the original posters intent though. It is not a turn on for me to "paint" images of women I find attractive. This is ultimately a defacement of beauty and the objectification of who she really is.

Lindsey wrote:Hmm. This is interesting, ...

I'm also a bit shocked that it almost bothers me a bit. I consider myself pretty unoffendable, but I suppose it bothers me in the sense that I feel like I should be protecting the girl in the picture, as she may not be the kind of person that would like this if she knew about it. My first reaction is to spare her by finding a picture of a girl that I know wouldn't mind, and submitting it for this. I suppose that would have to be a picture of me.

I'll think about this. But I felt compelled to input something.

-L

Wow, this is very hot: to think that you would submit yourself in the place of this girl and endure her fate.

If you do post a picture of yourself, Lindsey, I will ask Princess Christie if I am allowed to eh, participate.

Man, people are taking this way too seriously!

Its only some spunk on a picture... I could get some yoghurt and spread it on a printout and pretend its my cum and nobody would know the difference...not that I would...but all Im saying is its just a picture.

Im sure the idea of webteases, and guys wanking to them and edging and dildo-ing themselves to pictures of women then coming on the boards and talking about it would make a LOT of other people uncomfortable! But i guess we wouldnt like it if they all wrote on the boards about how it made them feel, telling us it was weird.

Its just a bit of fun as I see it. I just thought it would be a laugh, a bit of a strange thing to do instead of just cumming into a tissue or whatever.
I'm actually not that good at denying myself but I was thinking "yeah, ive got thursday off work, ill get as many edges in between then so i have a massive load to spunk up that picture!"


I wanna frap over that Keely picture dammit!!!

dont take me too seriously here, Im just trying to lighten the mood, no need to get so uptight about a bit of semen... its all wanking at the end of the day.
I think we should have a competition to write the word "Milovana" in spunk.

I'm not sure I follow the arguments that this is a problem. If we, as a community, are truly worried about using pictures without a woman's consent, doesn't that eliminate a lot of the site off the bat?

Aside from a few of the lovely ladies that grace our presence here, most of the pictures come from commercial porn sites. I'd wager a fair margin of those pictures weren't even purchased by the individuals creating the teases (though I could easily be wrong on this score).

If a person has a likeness right to control how their picture is being jerked over on the Internet, shouldn't that also apply to teases? Shouldn't we go ask, for instance, Raven Riley, how she feels about being used in so many teases, "telling" boys (and maybe some girls) so many things that she, herself, might not approve of?

While printing out a picture and cumming over it does squick me a bit, that squickiness doesn't seem to come from any logical place that doesn't also denounce this website as a whole. So long as it's clear that the models aren't affiliated with this project, I don't see a problem with using their likenesses in teases. Similarly, so long as there's no confusion between cumming over a picture and cumming over the real woman, I don't see a principled way of denouncing the practice.

Maybe I'm taking this too seriously, but as a sex-positive feminist, I see it as a duty to examine my reactions to sexual activities to see whether they might be problematic. I'm just not seeing how this particular reaction is anything more than an instinctive uncomfortable "ick" to a practice I probably wouldn't engage in or get off on.

Well, since I started this little torrent of uneasiness, I'd better defend myself.

First off, I don't really see how girls like Keeley, who pose nude for a living, don't imagine guys jerking off over their images. Lets be honest, the term 'sticky pages' originates from somewhere similar, doesn't it?
Therefore, I don't see how a girl in this line of work would be particularly offended by such an incident. I'd say that these models are more angry that they're not getting paid royalties for all the webteases they happen to be in unbeknownst to them!!

All in all, I'd say copyright would be more of an issue than cum. Yet we never really talk about the former.

If it makes people feel better, we could use porn stars, girls who experience the hardcore aspect of things in their line of work and as such know EXACTLY what such content is going to be used for by the males who look at it, just to keep our morals in check.

Again, if it makes people feel better, Keeley has a sex tape out there, and word on the street is that she leaked it herself. This should put people's minds at ease as to whether the world's most famous Page 3 girl who has posed nude countless times and knows that there's a sex tape of her out there in internet land would mind if her adoring male fanbase happened to spunk themselves whilst admiring her work.

Lindsey, I'm glad my idea caught your attention, and I think it's very good of you to offer a picture to get us started. This way, the model in question is 100% aware of what's going on. I can't argue with that.

All in all, I don't think glamour models would be too shocked by such a thread. It's just publicising what guys do privately - look at naked ladies

Milovana is "For the Explorer at Heart". I really didn't think this was stepping too far outside the lines. All I was proposing was showing the aftermath of a male jerkoff session on a girl who's nudity and sexuality is well-publicised. I'm not saying to find a picture of your cousin and jerk off on it in a dark corner. There's nothing voyeuristic about my intent here.

Take from it what you will . . .