Milovana.com

Honestly, some of us arn't into that sort of thing. If its tagged- everybodys happy, right?

HERE HERE I agree.... That's the kinda shit that when you pick the chick up in the bar... you go to reach and find the wrong shit down there.... That ain't right.

I think some of the fun of she-male teases is finding out at the end. If you tag them you take away the element of surprise. That said, I am not a fan of she-male teases and think that most of them ought to be tagged. For humiliation's sake and surprise I'd say don't tag maybe 1 in 10, or 1 in 20. But make it a real convincing one and don't let on until the last page.

I'm not into shemales. But I thought that most recent was was very well done. Those rears were hot. So hot I almost clicked shemale at the end, but I still had to go with the woman option.

In a perfect world (and its probably a sod to code..) I think a few changes would sort this out.

First I think that tags should be (or can be) hidden. I think for a lot of teases, she-male ones in particular, if you tag it then you lose the surprise. Also things like 'Ruined Orgasm' as a tag well you kinda know you can cum but it'll be ruined.

Second you should be able to specify in your profile which teases you (don't) want to be shown. So I specifically don't want she-male stuff, but anything else is fine. That way if used properly you can choose ANY tease to do and it won't be out of your scope, but will be as random as you allow.

So if you haven't explicitly said no to she-male teases there is a chance you'll get one - and you won't know because of the tags. Flip side if you DO say no to them, you can pick a random tease and not worry about getting something that you're not into...

Oh + also calling them "Shemale Surprise"..... Eh? :)

I agree, I extremely dislike the she male teases. I mean sometimes, like once a year, its fun for the element of surprise. I mean tag them, include them in the name and everyone is happy. That being said I know we cannot please "everyone" but we can at least do our best., And if we cannot get tags or even hidden like suggested in another post. But at the very least put "shemale" in the title. Or even on the 1st page.

Thanks to everyone and hope you have a great day tommorrow

another vote for tagging here. information is good.

I vote for surprise. ...You'll get used it.

But the idea to hide tags as an option i sgood - would please those that like th eunknown and those that want a Milovana equivalent of Net Nanny - no offense.

I like the idea of using profile options to filter out the teases you absolutely don't want as suggested by Dath85. This way you can still be surprised(Wich IMHO is the best thing about teases; not knowing what's going to happen.) while never getting the surprises you don't want.

This would work well for she-male teases, but also for ruined orgasm teases(as fixed end or as option/chance) and other kinds that require a surprise. It would be absolutely great to have this. Currently either the surprise is ruined(no pun intended) because the tease is tagged, or you get a nasty surprise at the end if your not into whatever the surprise is.

I have no idea how hard this would be to code, but this is currently my #1 wish for milovana.

I understand that the surprise is lost when tagging. I know it defeats the object of the tease, sometimes.

If I knew people didn't like a certain element of a webtease, for example, forced shit eating (extreme, but i'm guessing most of us dont.) I'd be certain to include it in the tag as a sign of respect to the reader.

None of us are here to judge the people that enjoy those types of teases. Its just always nice to raise awareness that not everyone gets off on that kinda thing.

Peace.

Agree -- if there was a way to have our preferences for what we DON'T want to see be set somewhere, that would still allow us to avoid teases/themes we don't like while at the same time not 'giving away' the ending or outcome of others that we would like.

I'm not a fan of the she-male stuff, and even though it's perhaps viewed as a 'tease' by some to find out at some point during the episode, for me it's not a 'tease' but rather a flat-out turn-off. Or, for example, the foreign language teases. Perhaps nice pics, but my German ain't that good. :)

So that double-blind sort of tag/preference where you specify what you DON'T want to see would be my vote for a future site update at some point.

Could we tag them like this, or like this?
If the tag was the same color as the background, you could select the text to make it appear.
(The background color for the webtease page is #F2CFCF.)
Then you could choose to look at the tags or not, and require the tags to be accurate.

I vote for allowing the tag to be available.

For those who want to make a tease in which at the end they surprise you with a she-male, that's fine, don't use it. You lack originality and are worse than an M. Night Shyamalan ripoff. It's been done before, and better.

That said, quite a few shemale teases start off with the knowledge of she-male being known. Or the status of shemale is revealed within the first few slides. Than the tag should at least be made available for the author to use.

I believe you can put any tag you want on your teases, you can add "puppies" as a tag if you want. So nothing is stopping the authors from tagging them however they want. :)