Milovana.com

Hi guys!

Something just hit me yesterday.
Why isn't there a single electronic chastity device? I know of the dreamlover labs, but they dont make a chastity belt, and the add'on seems rather expensive.

It seems strange in these techy days? I believe it would be very possible? And simple?

Imagine a simple ball trap chastity device thats detects wether or not there is a penis and if that is (not) allowed. Depending on the answer it would deliver a shock to your balls until it detects the penis being back in place.
Seems rather simple to me? basicly there needs to be a pulse, so if it carried an optic sensor (like many sport watches) it would be able to detect that.

Ideas? Thoughts?

Regards :)

http://www.latowski.de/latowskiFlash/410a.htm
extremely expensive
http://www.neosteel.de/Nsepcbe.htm
still pricy

and s something a little bit cheaper than dreamlove (but no internet control)
https://www.extremerestraints.com/chast ... _9158.html

again bit expensive.. but hey it's voice controlled!
https://www.extremerestraints.com/chast ... 10162.html


Remember a chastity device , at least a decent one can cost 100..
and an estim.. is more and then figuring it out.
doubt anything decent and wearable for long term is going to be much cheaper than 100..

genome231 wrote:Something just hit me yesterday.
Why isn't there a single electronic chastity device? I know of the dreamlover labs, but they dont make a chastity belt, and the add'on seems rather expensive.

Good idea! Instead of relying entirely on physically encasing the penis to enforce chastity, rely on combination of shocks and electronics. This would solve some of the comfort and health issues associated with trying to construct an escape-proof design (I'm not that I'm saying electric shock is more comfortable than a tight device! Just that a tight device can be a pain even when you're being a good boy.)

It could be even taken one step further, removing the penis encasement fully, with only a sensor on the penis, and the shocking could be somewhere a little easier to lock on to, like a belt, wristband, or collar. This could be setup to shock on any erection. Of course there would need to be extensive laboratory testing to see the effect of involuntary erections like the nighttime woody, I volunteer for the laboratory testing.

In wonder if there's any way to detect orgasms, rather than erections? That would be even niftier. I'll google it.

Well I would imagine a chastity belt much like birdlocked.
In the shaft of the device there would be an infrared sensor like in sportwatches (its quite small) detecting a pulse.
Pulse = penis inside the shaft = true -> no shock
But then if the penis was removed this would return false and thus deliver a heavy shock to the balls.
Since its a balltrap device It cant be removed completely, and thus it can keep delivering shocks to the wearer until the penis is returned or till the battery runs out (which would take some time).
I feel like this would solve the pullout problem with balltrap devices.

Regards
Genome

what would be really good is a device where theres nothing encasing the penis but something that can sense when its being stroked, and when a guy cums there are twitches and spasms in certain places that could be detected so, nothing bad if hes a good boy, a reasonably jarring shock if he tries to stroke then the entire time he's cumming it shocks very painfully until the orgasm spasms stop and i could leave a mild irritating current there that feels like 'blue balls' until the keyholder gets back!