Milovana.com

can anyone tell me how i can get the file ? do i need to make a mega account ? and if so how would i find it afterwards. thanks in advance

book_guy wrote: Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:28 pm Glad to see the file is available again.

May I suggest, someone might upload it to Mega, changing whatever is necessary such that it will no longer offend those who might previously have been. Once it's available on Mega let me know the link, I'll transfer and re-share the improved version. I would try to upload, but, as I've mentioned elsewhere (see link in .sig) I don't always have reliable uploading time or connection.

not sure what was offensive, but here are an attempt to get the vid out there again on meganz (fingers crossed)

7zip

Spoiler: show

link

Spoiler: show

https://mega.nz/#!lPgHDQza

key

Spoiler: show

!YnuPfjxDPAAUmAqvCaNi0umx5ic_NUUcE2mWELq5Kp0

password

Spoiler: show

milovana

Not sure if it helps, but I understand someone like Mega will only store one copy of a file. If two files are exactly the same then they save space by keeping just one copy. However if one file gets taken down then actually all copies of that file are taken down. I've seen some people zip up their file and add a random text file into it to make their file different to avoid this.

I'm vague on the details though

wellrested wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:37 pm Not sure if it helps, but I understand someone like Mega will only store one copy of a file. If two files are exactly the same then they save space by keeping just one copy. However if one file gets taken down then actually all copies of that file are taken down. I've seen some people zip up their file and add a random text file into it to make their file different to avoid this.

I'm vague on the details though

Yes, this is an intelligent way to minimize space while helping sharing, and that's how I understand Mega would work, too. But if a first someone puts up a file, then a second someone else "gets" that file, then the first person takes that file down, the file SHOULD remain on Mega because the second person still wants it. As long as the file is "copied" to the second person's Mega cloud, rather than merely "shared" there, the file shouldn't be removed. This was the case, as far as I know, yet the file got removed anyway. In other words, abstractly speaking, Mega pro-actively propagated a removal task to all locations where a file might have been secured, rather than merely re-actively removing an original file that had been linked to a variety of locations. So to speak.

book_guy wrote: Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:36 am

wellrested wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:37 pm Not sure if it helps, but I understand someone like Mega will only store one copy of a file. If two files are exactly the same then they save space by keeping just one copy. However if one file gets taken down then actually all copies of that file are taken down. I’ve seen some people zip up their file and add a random text file into it to make their file different to avoid this.

I’m vague on the details though

Yes, this is an intelligent way to minimize space while helping sharing, and that’s how I understand Mega would work, too. But if a first someone puts up a file, then a second someone else “gets” that file, then the first person takes that file down, the file SHOULD remain on Mega because the second person still wants it. As long as the file is “copied” to the second person’s Mega cloud, rather than merely “shared” there, the file shouldn’t be removed. This was the case, as far as I know, yet the file got removed anyway. In other words, abstractly speaking, Mega pro-actively propagated a removal task to all locations where a file might have been secured, rather than merely re-actively removing an original file that had been linked to a variety of locations. So to speak.

Most likely, each account has a pointer to where the file is stored. As long as at least one person has a pointer to the file, they keep it around. When you delete the file in your account, you just delete your pointer to it. But when they get a takedown notice, they just delete the file, making all pointers invalid. Maybe that’s what you meant to indicate, but that would at least be a sensible way to run that kind of system. So they wouldn’t need to propagate really, other than removing the invalid pointer, which would probably be handled as part of regular automation anyway. I don’t work at Mega, obviously, so I don’t know that that’s how they do it, but I do have close to two decades of experience as a software engineer and I have built similar systems in the past, so I think I at least partially know what I’m talking about. :)

3xTripleXXX wrote: Sun Jul 29, 2018 1:01 am

book_guy wrote: Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:36 am

wellrested wrote: Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:37 pm Not sure if it helps, but I understand someone like Mega will only store one copy of a file. If two files are exactly the same then they save space by keeping just one copy. However if one file gets taken down then actually all copies of that file are taken down. I’ve seen some people zip up their file and add a random text file into it to make their file different to avoid this.

I’m vague on the details though

Yes, this is an intelligent way to minimize space while helping sharing, and that’s how I understand Mega would work, too. But if a first someone puts up a file, then a second someone else “gets” that file, then the first person takes that file down, the file SHOULD remain on Mega because the second person still wants it. As long as the file is “copied” to the second person’s Mega cloud, rather than merely “shared” there, the file shouldn’t be removed. This was the case, as far as I know, yet the file got removed anyway. In other words, abstractly speaking, Mega pro-actively propagated a removal task to all locations where a file might have been secured, rather than merely re-actively removing an original file that had been linked to a variety of locations. So to speak.

Most likely, each account has a pointer to where the file is stored. As long as at least one person has a pointer to the file, they keep it around. When you delete the file in your account, you just delete your pointer to it. But when they get a takedown notice, they just delete the file, making all pointers invalid. Maybe that’s what you meant to indicate, but that would at least be a sensible way to run that kind of system. So they wouldn’t need to propagate really, other than removing the invalid pointer, which would probably be handled as part of regular automation anyway. I don’t work at Mega, obviously, so I don’t know that that’s how they do it, but I do have close to two decades of experience as a software engineer and I have built similar systems in the past, so I think I at least partially know what I’m talking about. :)

That is my understanding too - if mega gets a takedown request that is asking it to remove the file from mega, not remove the file from a single user of mega.

Yeah, we're all saying the same thing, I'm just saying it bass-ackwards. The "pointer" concept is indeed what I meant to indicate. What I worry about is the idea of "ownership." What if Mega deletes something from the "home" location that a "shared" location had a RIGHT to keep? For instance, let's say I am a member of Pronz-R-Us.com and I have a nice big fat twelve-gigabyte video I want to keep. Six other friends from Milovana also have it. In fact, I first got it from one of those dudes. Of the seven of us, three are members of Pronz-R-Us. One of you nefarious dolts shares it illegally, Pronz complains, Mega takes action, and Mega removes the initial file. This removal implies removal of all pointers to that file. Thus, Mega may have removed MY copy from MY access of it because it was pointer-arranged in a manner that made it look like I shouldn't have it. But I do have a right to it. They never checked with me before removing my things; they just assumed they knew better about what I own, than I do. That assumption is dangerous, off-putting. If they're going to police, then they need to police the pointer-arrangements as carefully as they police the source-files from which those pointers extend. They didn't do that; rather, they just blanket-deleted, and that's the most telling aspect of it all. "Wait, what's quick? I know. Delete everyone's everything. Just do a full format. That'll teach 'em." Uhmmm ... really?

That’s certainly a good point, though it’s pretty typical for online storage services to cover their asses first and ask questions later or never. These days I work in the entertainment industry, and have to deal with piracy as a fact of life. Honestly, at least in my situation, most of it isn’t worth chasing down, but most legitimate sites will jump on a DMCA notice ASAP and hit the content immediately. Either take it down completely, or at least remove access to it. Getting it back up typically requires at least a stern email exchange and sometimes a legal team. Even Amazon will do this, and it’ll be up to the accused to prove that they do indeed have the rights to sell/upload something before they can resume activity. I know content providers whose new product launches have been completely gutted by this.

where are the downloads for this please?

Seems someone finally re-upped it on PH anyway - for as long as it lasts.

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php? ... a8633e9058

Will you be making a second version of this? Absolutely the best cock hero made!!

smargerbarg wrote: Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:41 pm Will you be making a second version of this? Absolutely the best cock hero made!!

Thank you for your kind words.

Sadly not. I have burried the project "Earn your Release 2" two months ago. I've had a very detailed concept for a 12 round (100min) monster and prepared all the footage, but it was simply too much work for me alone. I tried to find help but without luck.

I think I've made some great progress with beat matching and clip cutting. Here is the early alpha version of the first 3 rounds for anyone who is curious:
https://mega.nz/#!TzghkQII!dYTfnL8AI9Ul ... ffJdZM1HgQ
It's missing the story, the text messages and the extra stuff I have planned. So it's a raw version but you might get a feel of what its about.

I am sad that I can't share the full challenge I have planned. And that would have been a hell of a challenge in the later levels. But thats how life goes.

One idea would be to split all the gui stuff from the video and release it as a second screen version (video) that can be played as a joi tease on a smartphone / tablet / laptop while selecting your own 100min porn playlist on the main screen. Just an idea, but it's doable if I can skip the time consuming beat/video editing and focus on creating the instructions.

Spoiler: show

edgefan wrote: Sun Dec 23, 2018 2:09 pm

smargerbarg wrote: Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:41 pm Will you be making a second version of this? Absolutely the best cock hero made!!

Thank you for your kind words.

Sadly not. I have burried the project "Earn your Release 2" two months ago. I've had a very detailed concept for a 12 round (100min) monster and prepared all the footage, but it was simply too much work for me alone. I tried to find help but without luck.

I think I've made some great progress with beat matching and clip cutting. Here is the early alpha version of the first 3 rounds for anyone who is curious:
https://mega.nz/#!TzghkQII!dYTfnL8AI9Ul ... ffJdZM1HgQ
It's missing the story, the text messages and the extra stuff I have planned. So it's a raw version but you might get a feel of what its about.

I am sad that I can't share the full challenge I have planned. And that would have been a hell of a challenge in the later levels. But thats how life goes.

One idea would be to split all the gui stuff from the video and release it as a second screen version (video) that can be played as a joi tease on a smartphone / tablet / laptop while selecting your own 100min porn playlist on the main screen. Just an idea, but it's doable if I can skip the time consuming beat/video editing and focus on creating the instructions.

Sad news! Earn Your Release is by far my favorite video currently and I've been looking forward to a sequel. The first three rounds are amazing on the alpha, even without story and extra bits. If you managed to find someone to help still, would you consider continuing the project? Anyway, thanks for your contributions to this unique genre of porn!

Ohh its so amaizing! Pls finish it

Thank you for your kind words.

Sadly not. I have burried the project "Earn your Release 2" two months ago. I've had a very detailed concept for a 12 round (100min) monster and prepared all the footage, but it was simply too much work for me alone. I tried to find help but without luck.

I really do hope that you will be able to finish “Earn your Release 2” it looks to be even greater than the first! I wish I could help in some way, if there is any way I may be of assistance please let me know!!