Milovana.com

Minddevourer wrote:

Spoiler: show

It is a bit like "don't think of the pink elephant" kind of thing... once said, it is sure to be on your mind, it is just how our mind works, if you try to concentrate on keeping something out, you actually concentrate on keeping it in.

So that part to "not see or remember the pendant" is playing with the human mind, and it is basically impossible to not think of it.


And yes, i know too well that there are quite a few irresponsible hypnotists out there, who are either unused to giving sugegstions, or who do this purely on purpose. I spent a lot of my time "fixing" things for people who have been screwed afterwards. I used to be on many hypnosis related sites and communities, as this is also a big kink of mine. But i left them all again, as i couldn't stand how they developed... all of them. What the online hypnosis community is nowadays can barely compared to what it was like when i started with this. My advice can only be: if you are new to hypnosis, female, inexperienced, very curious about hypnosis and young, stay away from any of those communities, as in 95% of the cases you will end up with the wrong person. Maybe it is not this bad, but it is still bad enough, and as i spent so much time "repairing" damage that was done, i may have a more negative view on it than it really is.


Thats why i only posted one of my scripts in the story section, and also with a huge disclaimer above, and a description what would be inside. Hypnosis can be powerful, especially if the person has no clue about it or wrong impressions.

Thank you for speaking up....I had hoped that you would. *soft smile*

Without sounding too cynical, is no one else suspicious that each of the 1001 posting so far is model like stunning...

Streetsweeper wrote:Without sounding too cynical, is no one else suspicious that each of the 1001 posting so far is model like stunning...

Pssssst...... That's not really ~me~ over on the left there, either....

Just in case you were wondering....

Minddevourer wrote:It is a bit like "don't think of the pink elephant" kind of thing... once said, it is sure to be on your mind, it is just how our mind works, if you try to concentrate on keeping something out, you actually concentrate on keeping it in.

So that part to "not see or remember the pendant" is playing with the human mind, and it is basically impossible to not think of it.

There's a name for this, actually - ironic processing. It's kind of similar to "the Game" (the object of the Game is to avoid thinking about the Game; if you do, you lose the Game).

With Kendoll, the point isn't really to make you think about the heart pendant itself - it's that thinking about the pendant makes you think about Kendoll. As for this:

"You can prove
that Kendoll's Heart Pendant
has no effect on you.
When you press continue a timer will start,
Simply, do not think about Kendoll's Heart Pendant."

Yes, I did think about the heart pendant when I flipped through the tease to see what it was about. This doesn't really mean much though, since my thoughts were "eh, this is kind of silly". :P Later on in the tease, there's a close up of a woman's eyes with what looks to be a cross between a bird and a pinecone in front. And of course, in her newest tease, "I WILL FUCKING HYPNOTIZE YOUR ASS" - I laughed out loud. This can't count as real hypnosis, can it?

Mistress Kendoll's Heart Pendant
Will make
you
facepalm.

Zumba zumba
this is dumba

Streetsweeper wrote:Without sounding too cynical, is no one else suspicious that each of the 1001 posting so far is model like stunning...

Shell really is a mermaid, les really is a floating wizard, and I'm really a silhouette of Tom Waits with only one arm.

Alliteration wrote: Yes, I did think about the heart pendant when I flipped through the tease to see what it was about. This doesn't really mean much though, since my thoughts were "eh, this is kind of silly". :P Later on in the tease, there's a close up of a woman's eyes with what looks to be a cross between a bird and a pinecone in front. And of course, in her newest tease, "I WILL FUCKING HYPNOTIZE YOUR ASS" - I laughed out loud. This can't count as real hypnosis, can it?

Mistress Kendoll's Heart Pendant
Will make
you
facepalm.

Zumba zumba
this is dumba

You sound like you take great pride in mocking those just trying to have a little fun. Maybe you should spend less time laughing at something other people enjoy but you don't get, and spend more time reading the teases you enjoy, or better yet, writing your own.

Seriously... if you don't like the tease style that's fine. If you think it's silly that's fine... but unless you're going to offer *constructive criticism* to the writer you might as well just give it a bad rating and move on. Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than to pick a fight online and make terrible jokes to mock the writer?

Anyone who can write a tease that makes it past the minimum viewing threshold deserves to be applauded for their work. This site is very much community-driven, and the tease writers are a big part of the engine that drives it forward. If someone made a post about every tease saying "LOL THIS IS SO DUMB U CANT BE SERIOUS" the number of teases would drop, and the quality of the site would drop dramatically. *Every* tease on this site is based on fantasy. They are based around fictional characters and scenarios that require varying levels of suspension to your belief.

I've played teases that I thought were terrible, in spite of their reviews. Maybe the writer's style didn't jive with me. Maybe the tease featured too much text, pictures that I didn't enjoy, or was simply too long/short. Maybe the themes involved just didn't appeal to me. Did I go create a thread declaring "HEY I DONT LIKE THIS THEREFORE ITS STUPID AND SHOULD BE MOCKED"? No. I rated the tease based on my fair assessment of the writer's work and I moved on.

I was fine with you voicing your opinions, but I feel like what you're doing now is harmful to the greater community. The admins are setting a very dangerous precedent by allowing this kind of gratuitous slander to continue.

Here's an idea for you: the next time you feel the urge to criticize content on the site, go open the tease editor instead and try to create content. If we could get one quality tease for every post of yours in this thread that illustrated ignorance, immaturity, and a clear desire to mock something you didn't personally enjoy, we would have a nice crop of quality teases to play through...

sarah_sweetgirl wrote:

Alliteration wrote: Yes, I did think about the heart pendant when I flipped through the tease to see what it was about. This doesn't really mean much though, since my thoughts were "eh, this is kind of silly". :P Later on in the tease, there's a close up of a woman's eyes with what looks to be a cross between a bird and a pinecone in front. And of course, in her newest tease, "I WILL FUCKING HYPNOTIZE YOUR ASS" - I laughed out loud. This can't count as real hypnosis, can it?

Mistress Kendoll's Heart Pendant
Will make
you
facepalm.

Zumba zumba
this is dumba

You sound like you take great pride in mocking those just trying to have a little fun. Maybe you should spend less time laughing at something other people enjoy but you don't get, and spend more time reading the teases you enjoy, or better yet, writing your own.

Seriously... if you don't like the tease style that's fine. If you think it's silly that's fine... but unless you're going to offer *constructive criticism* to the writer you might as well just give it a bad rating and move on. Do you really have nothing better to do with your time than to pick a fight online and make terrible jokes to mock the writer?

Anyone who can write a tease that makes it past the minimum viewing threshold deserves to be applauded for their work. This site is very much community-driven, and the tease writers are a big part of the engine that drives it forward. If someone made a post about every tease saying "LOL THIS IS SO DUMB U CANT BE SERIOUS" the number of teases would drop, and the quality of the site would drop dramatically. *Every* tease on this site is based on fantasy. They are based around fictional characters and scenarios that require varying levels of suspension to your belief.

I've played teases that I thought were terrible, in spite of their reviews. Maybe the writer's style didn't jive with me. Maybe the tease featured too much text, pictures that I didn't enjoy, or was simply too long/short. Maybe the themes involved just didn't appeal to me. Did I go create a thread declaring "HEY I DONT LIKE THIS THEREFORE ITS STUPID AND SHOULD BE MOCKED"? No. I rated the tease based on my fair assessment of the writer's work and I moved on.

I was fine with you voicing your opinions, but I feel like what you're doing now is harmful to the greater community. The admins are setting a very dangerous precedent by allowing this kind of gratuitous slander to continue.

Here's an idea for you: the next time you feel the urge to criticize content on the site, go open the tease editor instead and try to create content. If we could get one quality tease for every post of yours in this thread that illustrated ignorance, immaturity, and a clear desire to mock something you didn't personally enjoy, we would have a nice crop of quality teases to play through...

hu·mor
   [hyoo-mer or, often, yoo-]
noun
1.
a comic, absurd, or incongruous quality causing amusement: the humor of a situation.
2.
the faculty of perceiving what is amusing or comical: He is completely without humor.
3.
an instance of being or attempting to be comical or amusing; something humorous: The humor in his joke eluded the audience.
4.
the faculty of expressing the amusing or comical: The author's humor came across better in the book than in the movie.
5.
comical writing or talk in general; comical books, skits, plays, etc.

ballsfull wrote:

Streetsweeper wrote:Without sounding too cynical, is no one else suspicious that each of the 1001 posting so far is model like stunning...

Pssssst...... That's not really ~me~ over on the left there, either....

Just in case you were wondering....

i realise that but you get the point i make? its about creating an illusion...

and he says that I tend to attack people with no reason...

Nezhul wrote:and he says that I tend to attack people with no reason...

Who says that? Where?

Kendollshottie wrote:hello, this is Mistress Kendoll's hottie, i see so much disrespect for my Mistress's creation, well disrespect me for She created me as well without Her pendant, She found me, offered me a place at Her feet, i excepted, and i became Hers, She could have used me anyway She choose, good or bad, but all She showed was love for me, yes love!She encouraged exercise and with my first weight loss She praised me so much! it wasn't hypnosis but love and only love that keeps me here!

i love and adore You Mistress,

hottie

Thank you for such a sweet post. I liked hearing that you are treated with love by your Mistress. *Smile*

Hey guys. Brief introduction - first time poster, long time....admirer. Was reading about copyright issues before making my first Webtease when I came across this post.

Not overly into the sub-dom/me relationships because I feel they are too basic and one dimensional. Not an insult just my personality regarding all this is more complex and .... subtle

I hate the idea of having multiple subs, which is I guess why I'm getting involved. Without the prospect of complete loss at the failure of a relationship the stakes just ar'nt high enough.

And I'm not closed minded, I get that the dom can be empowered but not being committed but that only requires a credible threat (game theory), at most a 1 time thing and not a relationship. A second relationship to me simply halves the value of the first one.

Now on to topic. Kendal (spelling?) writes a tease, a week later (ish) lots of people *sign *up who use hot sigs. Really? And almost ALL, Publicly follow her. I mean seriously people, this is the internet, creating 100 [0000] accounts is easy (read: boring) and so is following yourself and glorifying yourself. See where I'm going?

As for the "duel personality" issue, I think its 1 person. But its the internet, its role-play, deal with it. Also if you have a dom sub relationship with someone over the internet and you hav'nt seen (webcam-ed-at least) then that's your business (read:your stupid - but I don't judge). Seriously, if your doing this, find and go watch the movie "trust", your the little girl and there is no dad at the end.

Wow what a rant, and what an introduction to the community.
HI!!!! *Waves

Dont feed the Ken.... no wait...Dont feed the trolls

Peace