Milovana.com

book_guy wrote:

realnot wrote:Here's an outside-the-box suggestion. How about a Cock Hero with no music, but with beats to the rhythm of the on-screen action? That would also provide the added benefit of allowing you to listen to the audio of the scene, which is sometimes the hottest part.

Second!

brewster wrote:I think an oscilloscope sine-wave type beat meter would be amazing for future CH videos. Especially for the beats that are farther apart, aka the slow strokes. Naturally the oscilloscope would mimic the stroke of your hand, thus the top would be when you reach the top of your cock, etc.

This would also allow for a variety of different strokes, other than the vanilla entire-shaft stroke. Short fast head-only strokes could be easily shown on the beat meter. To make that graphically easy to follow, the entire meter should be shown on 3 horizontal bars (top, middle, bottom) like sheet music, but 3 instead of 5 bars.

mybestother wrote:

brewster wrote:I think an oscilloscope sine-wave type beat meter would be amazing for future CH videos. Especially for the beats that are farther apart, aka the slow strokes. Naturally the oscilloscope would mimic the stroke of your hand, thus the top would be when you reach the top of your cock, etc.

This would also allow for a variety of different strokes, other than the vanilla entire-shaft stroke. Short fast head-only strokes could be easily shown on the beat meter. To make that graphically easy to follow, the entire meter should be shown on 3 horizontal bars (top, middle, bottom) like sheet music, but 3 instead of 5 bars.

Great idea! On the same concept of the three horizontal bars, the meter color could be red on top and blue on the bottom (a pun on blue balls). It could make it easier to see when you're not paying attention on the stroke meter. I have no idea how simple/hard it would be to video edit this.

• Multiple Audio Tracks. one with fast beats, one with slow beats to recovery, you have to get a stopwatch and run it only on the fast audiotrack.
• At the end there comes a part where it is asked how long you were on the fast track.
• Whether you were good or bad you get a different ending. Maybe it is in multiple files an you get the command to open video xyz or you have to jump to given time in the video.

Thundercat2k9 wrote:Hi Milos007,

I would suggest u try WORKout Lite 1 and 2 *you alr found them*

Freestyle stroking throughout the whole time! (and of course great quality,music etc.)

• Anti-climax (pun intended) "reward" or cum rounds with little or nothing besides one, not always attractive, woman talking to the camera.
• Lack of build-up from round to round - e.g. showing some hardcore one round, then going back to boring softcore stripping the next. (This can be a useful device if done sparingly, but it shouldn't be an ongoing thing; difficulty should generally trend up, not seem nearly random from round to round.) I guess the above is just a special case of this.
• Rounds, or even entire videos, that assume all guys are into big tits. Personally, past a certain point they're a turn-off and even a gross-out for me. (This is NOT a criticism of Boobe as (a) at least he clearly labels his videos as this, i.e. he realizes this is a fetish and not the default, and (b) believe it or not, he's not the worst offender!)
• Cuts so fast you can't even tell what's going on.
• Ugly MILFs! (Or rather, MIWFWYDs - see if you can unpack that acronym!) Why, with the unfathomably vast array of gorgeous porn stars out there, is it apparently considered mandatory to include at least one woman in every CH video who's a butterface at best and sometimes not even that?

abel.semen wrote:Some things I'd like to see LESS of:

• Anti-climax (pun intended) "reward" or cum rounds with little or nothing besides one, not always attractive, woman talking to the camera.
• Lack of build-up from round to round - e.g. showing some hardcore one round, then going back to boring softcore stripping the next. (This can be a useful device if done sparingly, but it shouldn't be an ongoing thing; difficulty should generally trend up, not seem nearly random from round to round.) I guess the above is just a special case of this.
• Rounds, or even entire videos, that assume all guys are into big tits. Personally, past a certain point they're a turn-off and even a gross-out for me. (This is NOT a criticism of Boobe as (a) at least he clearly labels his videos as this, i.e. he realizes this is a fetish and not the default, and (b) believe it or not, he's not the worst offender!)
• Cuts so fast you can't even tell what's going on.
• Ugly MILFs! (Or rather, MIWFWYDs - see if you can unpack that acronym!) Why, with the unfathomably vast array of gorgeous porn stars out there, is it apparently considered mandatory to include at least one woman in every CH video who's a butterface at best and sometimes not even that?

I guess I'll quit there. If this shakes someone out of a rut, great. If not, at least I've got these thoughts off my chest after yet another CH release that... actually didn't turn out to be all that bad on the whole, but suffered from some clear filler rounds that served to annoy rather than arouse.

abel.semen wrote:Some things I'd like to see LESS of:

• Anti-climax (pun intended) "reward" or cum rounds with little or nothing besides one, not always attractive, woman talking to the camera.
• Lack of build-up from round to round - e.g. showing some hardcore one round, then going back to boring softcore stripping the next. (This can be a useful device if done sparingly, but it shouldn't be an ongoing thing; difficulty should generally trend up, not seem nearly random from round to round.) I guess the above is just a special case of this.
• Rounds, or even entire videos, that assume all guys are into big tits. Personally, past a certain point they're a turn-off and even a gross-out for me. (This is NOT a criticism of Boobe as (a) at least he clearly labels his videos as this, i.e. he realizes this is a fetish and not the default, and (b) believe it or not, he's not the worst offender!)
• Cuts so fast you can't even tell what's going on.
• Ugly MILFs! (Or rather, MIWFWYDs - see if you can unpack that acronym!) Why, with the unfathomably vast array of gorgeous porn stars out there, is it apparently considered mandatory to include at least one woman in every CH video who's a butterface at best and sometimes not even that?

I guess I'll quit there. If this shakes someone out of a rut, great. If not, at least I've got these thoughts off my chest after yet another CH release that... actually didn't turn out to be all that bad on the whole, but suffered from some clear filler rounds that served to annoy rather than arouse.