Re: In the eye of the beholder...(game)
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 10:10 am
Hmmm...this has lots of potential! *wiggling eyebrows and smiling*
... for the explorer at heart!
https://milovana.com/forum/
Hmmm...this has lots of potential! *wiggling eyebrows and smiling*
Only good girls get a lot more. Naughty girls get less.shell wrote: A LOT more lubrication!!!!! *lol*
*laughing* I see!dix wrote:See Shell,
All you need is lubricant and patience...
http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/346 ... c74c5g.jpg
Dix.
*laughing* me too!!!dix wrote:Oh why did I say that.dix wrote:See Shell,
All I have in my head now is "She sells sea shells on the sea shore..."
![]()
Dix.
Mr. B is scary!!! *hides under the bed* *lol*
Awesome pic!!! *smile*dix wrote:I love the use of the single colour on the toys in this picture while the rest remains B&W.
http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/fd1 ... 504a5g.jpg
Dix.
Haha.shell wrote:
Mr. B is scary!!! *hides under the bed* *lol*
"Some one" did no such thing! *blushing and giggling*dr.d wrote:some one just told me to make this the last post tonight , enjoy
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0/54 ... _super.jpg
thank God I'm a good girl...and I have proof!!! It's in my signature! *giggling*dix wrote:Only good girls get a lot more. Naughty girls get less.shell wrote: A LOT more lubrication!!!!! *lol*![]()
Dix.
Haha, I guess you're lucky then.shell wrote: thank God I'm a good girl...and I have proof!!! It's in my signature! *giggling*

Very, Very lucky!!! *bright smile*dix wrote:Haha, I guess you're lucky then.shell wrote: thank God I'm a good girl...and I have proof!!! It's in my signature! *giggling*![]()
I do have some more picture to share but mediafire is being annoying and not working right. I'll have to post them later.
Dix.


Indeed, not forgetting that in a hurry :Dshell wrote: janmb -
Well hello there. *smile* I know you!! *grin* I guess since you've been following for awhile...you know me too, huh? *giggle* You and Lady X enjoyed a reward together. *smile*
In retrospect, given the need to somehow convey which image we are commenting on at any given time, quoting the image itself seems the lesser among evils really. Having to explain is both cumbersome to the poster as well as the reader.shell wrote:Thank you for coming out of the shadows to make a comment about the poll. *smile*
I understand about your suggestion about the repeated images. I have thought about it over the weekend.
One problem that I see with trying to make comments about an image without having the image present, is that even the one the comment is made to, might not know which picture is being commented on, if the picture isn't present.
Another thing is this.....when I want to comment on something, it is so much easier to click on reply and comment right there, then to try and describe a picture...that takes more time. But as you will notice...I did just post the links and not the picture through this reply. *Smile* All though sometimes it is nice to see the image again.
I am sorry that it's repetitive. I appreciate you sticking around, even though that frustrates you. *soft smile*