Flogger wrote:Ah.
Innovative, interesting, well-written and well put together.
If you want only the good criticism, look away now.
Oh boy.

But right from the get-go, Flogger, thanks a bunch for the lengthy feedback!

For brevity sakes, I'll just quote a bit from each of your points.
Flogger wrote:Right. First of all a particular bugbear (or two) of mine. It's "Anyway", not "Anyways" as I continually tell my continental european friends whose English is otherwise good.
Yeah, that's kind of an American slang thing.
Flogger wrote:... So why do you, and I assume you're American from it as this hasn't seemingly pervaded the rest of the world yet, continually refer to 'natural breasts'? Refer to the not obvious i.e. fake, if you must but it just makes more sense to say look at my tits/my surgeon's tits.
Heh, I guess did go overboard on stressing the "natural breasts" thing. I think it's something I do like to make a point of - not that I'm totally against breasts implants... but I am totally against "super obvious" breasts implants. I guess I like to "celebrate & highlight" when an adult model actually has a natural point. But good point.
Flogger wrote:Thirdly. Instructions that are mechanical. I know that many on here like to be told to stroke 400 divided by 3.979797 times to the power of a 600 watt lightbulb that has flown round the earth 8 times the lifetime of the Superman story's having been repeated in comics where he appears on the front cover in a flying position, but it's a bit ... sterile. I assume others also 'get off' on reading the instructions for how to put together a flatpack wardrobe. No different. Not my taste though. This has some bearing because the too-oft repeated 'count how many strokes/beats there were' bits were very tiresome. As were the repetition of certain elements because ultimately it felt like several 'teases' just rammed together to make a long (and still continuing after at least 3 hours) piece of work.

A well-written point, Flogger.
I do get your point about "instructions being mechanical" and I really tried to avoid any specific basic instructions (i.e. 'stroke 100 times') and relied on what I prefer - metronome based stroking. While metronome stroking is fairly straight to the point as well, it's also probably the best "stroking method device" to frame stroking instructions effectively with the illusion of "not being in control". I hope that makes sense. I also included "freeform" stroking methods that aren't as cut n' dry, allowing the user to stroke to their preferred speed. I also feel with the way I've "enhanced" the metronome stroke beat sounds in AW2 that it hopefully breaks the mechanical monotony of storking instructions.
Flogger wrote:I'm unsure about continuity...
AHAHAHA! Me neither!
From what I remember, the original Awesome Competition left it somewhat wide open whether the contest would be occurring after the the user got to the end and found out the "big secret". I took the story position that once the secret got out, it wouldn't be occurring as a "normal" event, but that this would be a special one-off as Miss X has become available again.
Flogger wrote:At one point you say that if a girl is knocked out, she's off the island then one of them offers you a choice of her not coming back and another one does come back. The annoying black-haired woman who I wanted to introduce to the shotgun that I'd smuggled onto the island just so I could blow her brains out.
Hmm. Honestly, I don't remember what part your referring to.
Flogger wrote:You've said that this is a tease you've written for yourself. It kinda shows in that apart from it just going on and on and on and ....and I can wade through a Cactusman 6 million million page epic, so ... it has some elements that I did find very tedious and repetive but that you might like, hence your putting them in there. Do I really give a sht that giraffes shag koalas if the equator moves .00000000001 degrees on the first Tuesday of the month provided we all wear lumberjack shirts? Well if it ain't gonna help at the local quiz/in the 'I want to get into your pants tonight' stakes, no.
Yeah, in some ways it was a bit "self-indulgence" on my part; while I definitely wanted to pay homage to Uberman's original tease, I wanted this tease to be something I - myself - would and could play over again and enjoy. All of the adult models I've chosen are women i find personally attracted to. That said, I really didn't want it to go "on and on and on" and I've tried to code so you the encounter rate wouldn't be "high" each round. Still tuning in that aspect but I even didn't realize how long it was going to be when I finally published it.
As for my next project, I'm going to "sit out" of making FlashTease's till the new version of the FlashTease editor - Eos - is fully implemented. Thanks again, Flogger, for the immense feedback.
