Page 2 of 2

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:12 pm
by dix
adorekristina wrote: It seems there have been many (and varying) threads about female authored cockteases...and yet there is no special attention for those women that DO pen them.
Sorry, but I'm never going to rate a tease higher based on the gender, race or sexuality of its author. If you want a tease to stand above all others then it needs originality, innovation and good writing.

Just throwing a tease together and saying it's authored by a Domme isn't going to get you five stars, nor should it.

And as it has been mentioned there have been plenty of women who have enjoyed much respect and special attention on here, most notably people like Miss Jay. And why? Because they become part of this community had help it grow. Not just turn up once in a while and expect red carpets dropped at their feet.

Respect is earned, not given. :dumbells:

Dix.

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:44 pm
by denton
miatly wrote:and each one has adorekristina.com written through the center.
That's probably so fewer people try to steal them.
miatly wrote:
While the idea of audio teases seems fantastic it never quite works for me. I dislike slow seductive pauses but there's no way to talk at a normal pace without making the whole thing seem disjointed. And while some people here might praise you and thank you for all your hard work I don't think it's _that_ hard to talk sexy into a microphone for 15 minutes. Surely writing relies more on skillfully chosen words; And arranging a few dozen pictures to a good tempo of instructions can be artful.
I don't think you're giving enough credit. I think just trying to talk sexy into a mic probably is as good of a tease as someone making a tease that says "stroke 100. stop. stroke to the edge. stop. stroke to the edge again. ruin your orgasm. haha, i bet your [sic!] frustrated now, arent you you little [whatever insult comes to the author's mind]". There is an art to it and people probably wouldn't pay Kristina for what she does if she weren't good at it.

miatly wrote: edit: actually, I'm unconvinced. You've posted 5 teases and there is year long gap between #2 and #3. You haven't posted a tease since May. The descriptions read like advertisements.
Well, it's not like she is forcing anyone to visit her site. From the few glimpses of kristina's teases, they do not require you to visit her site or pay for something. I think it is fair to advertise her page as long as it's not too extreme. I dislike the thought of paying someone for such a service because there would still be a part of me that thinks "she only does it for the money and not because she enjoys it", which kind of ruins it for me (also I have no spare money :P ).

miatly wrote: In case not everyone has figured it out yet teases are about us the viewer. Even when we say we want to worship the dom we usually want the tease to be about us. I get bored with the teases that go on and on about how great the dom is and how perfect they are and .. *yawn* Those teases are telling, not showing.
My feelings on this are similar. But tastes differ. Some prefer the style of LMJ, others that of Lady X etc. and I'm sure there are people who look just for what Kristina does. I am not really one of them, but that does not mean that her teases are bad or boring, they're just not quite what I am looking for.


I also agree with dix. As far as individual teases are concerned, the author does not really matter. But it does if there is interactivity on the forums and this is where LMJ and others excelled. That interactivity does probably cost a lot of time, though, so many dominant women (such as Kristina) demand monetary compensation for their more personal stuff. This isn't bad or wrong, it's everyone's choice.


With that being said, milovana really needs more (active) cockteasing women. Ritz is trying to provide a similar experience with his series (and from what I've seen he's doing a great job) but I think many people (me included) would much prefer actual women ;-) It sure would be great if Lady X or LMJ (or both of them.. although that would be scary :-D) or any of the other women who used to be here before I joined would come back.. or if someone new stepped up. The interactivity makes it so much better, more rewarding and more emotional, in my opinion.

Well.. wishful thinking alone won't do, sadly. :-(

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:51 pm
by adorekristina
oh I forgot to say...

ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME!!!

hahahaha

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:54 pm
by dix
adorekristina wrote:oh I forgot to say...

ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME!!!

Image

Me too.

Dix.

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:08 pm
by denton
Image

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:16 pm
by adorekristina
love those gulls...MINE MINE MINE


hahaha

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:27 pm
by pshagger
princess kristina are u doing any new tease i think they are great please can u let me no.

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:40 pm
by Incubo
I'm with Dix on this one. I'd add more, but really he's already said exactly what I was thinking anyway. I don't care who wrote the things when I rate it. Could be a purple chimp kept in a lab that was taught to type for all I care. I'm not rating the author. I'm rating the tease.

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:19 am
by ballsfull
Oh no, I agree with Kristina.....
I think ~my~ teases should be rated higher, ~just~ because it's ~me~, as well..... :-P

And I'd like a pony for my birthday too, if you wouldn't mind.... :lol: :lol:

But in the mean-time, I'll keep rating the teases I LIKE, higher, and the teases I'm DON'T care for that much, lower..... I presume that's how the rating system is ~supposed~ to work, right?? ;-)

Re: COCKTEASING WOMEN

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:27 am
by les
Perhaps the young lady should make a flash tease incorporating her voice talent.
So stimulating two senses at once.


Les