The Carnal Scholar wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:22 am
Hi book_guy. It sounds like (and please correct me if I've misunderstood) you've never used a metadata provider
No, I'm getting the endpoint-provided metadata. (I can see how it would appear otherwise about me, from my previous posts in this thread, I'm sorry I didn't make it more clear.) It's just that there isn't much metadata available for the porn that I have. F.e., I seek out and download from Empornium a buncha clips by one or another of my favorite goon-dommes, I pump the clips into my stash and let Stash-app scrape and tag them, and what does it tell me? It tells me, maybe, no more than "goon" and "gooning" and "goon-instruction" and an accurate performer name. Gee thanks.
So, for me, the utility of Stash-app is caught in a circular conundrum --
- Spoiler: show
- Here is the circle -- 1. I have certain porn preferences and therefore want porn which has a certain set of characteristics; so 2. I seek out porn which has that certain set of characteristics; then, 3. I download and keep that porn, as based on its possession of those characteristics; finally, 4. Stash-app looks at my porn, and it successfully tells me that my porn possesses those characteristics; thereby, I learn from 4. that 1. is indeed the case. I am left thinking, "Geez, I already KNEW this! That's why I chose that particular porn in the first place!"
As it works out, because I don't download huge chunks of un-examined porn, I don't benefit from Stash-app telling me anything which I don't already know. If I only download that which is gooning material; then the Stash-app would tell me, oh so very helpfully, "hey, this is probably gooning material." Umm ... yeah, no shit Sherlock.
On to the next topic.
Now that you've explained,
The Carnal Scholar wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:22 am
The
news is that there is now
https://pmvstash.org/ which is the first stash metadata provider for PMVs, Cock Hero, and other related remixed porn video art.
... at least I get the concept of what you're pointing toward. I have not implemented your new metadata provider, nor have I implemented the secondary one you mentioned, metadataapi.net. I'm not sure how either of those would alleviate my circularity problem (as described above) but it's silly for me not to experiment, so, I'll give it a try when I get a chance. Could you please provide (again?) a clear step-by-step? I find the complexities prohibitive. I could probably figure it out myself, if I were required to do so, but I don't want to be required to do so. I am intelligent and capable, but annoyed and probably also lazy.
I hope people reading this will get a sense of the complexity involved in setting this up. Although the app itself, Stash-app, is a rather sensible thing, it's very programmer-y; and the set-up has a set of rather high initial learning hurdles. There's several downloads, and a pair of memberships, required, and you have to write some simple code to implement ANY metadata provider (you'd think it would at least START with one pre-loaded? because without one, it's doing literally nothing!), and then you have to master an understanding of the tagging and labeling procedure(s) that are sometimes counter-intuitive. Prior to learning about Stash-app, most of the metadata management which I've been familiar with was more user-friendly, IMO. I recall Media Monkey being one management gadget, free to download, not difficult to understand, with auto-tagging from any of a number of metadata providers (though none based on any porn-oriented assumptions). I had hoped Stash-app would be similarly intuitive, but it's definitely not. It has a level of complexity for the end-user that suggests to me that it's probably designed for something bigger and more complex than merely tagging media with metadata; but I can't figure out whether it actually has any function OTHER than tagging media with metadata; in which case, why the unnecessary complexity, if that's all you're going to do with it?