Milovana.com

barebone123 wrote: Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:06 pm Yeah, I agree. What is with the humiliation stuff? That's maybe 1% of the population as a fetish (not knocking it just putting into context).

In general, guys want a strong women who takes charge and does playful fun stuff to drive us crazy. It's really simple: flirting, teasing, building mutual desire and excitement. If you dig deeper, it's really about managing dopamine and brain chemistry.

CH videos basically want to provide a surrogate (or ideally complement) for that. I think the best CH could/would be played by a couple as a teasing endurance game.

Tittyluvr1334 wrote: Wed Nov 01, 2017 6:23 pm

CH videos basically want to provide a surrogate (or ideally complement) for that. I think the best CH could/would be played by a couple as a teasing endurance game.

Have done so. My wife and I enjoy these. She was instrumental in assuring me that Inferno was hitting the mark because she enjoyed it so much. There are some she enjoys but may she does not - which is understandable as she is not the typical demographic for most CHs.

-TL

tommyfilth wrote: Wed Nov 01, 2017 3:38 pm You said Tainton.

Marno wrote: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:43 am
Unless those ten minutes happened to be entirely unrepresentative of the rest of it.

barebone123 wrote: Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:29 pm "which is understandable as she is not the typical demographic for most CHs. "

I still think we need to change up the target market and there is a killer concept for couples here.

Tittyluvr1334 wrote: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:39 pm

barebone123 wrote: Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:29 pm "which is understandable as she is not the typical demographic for most CHs. "

I still think we need to change up the target market and there is a killer concept for couples here.

I don't disagree at all. But again - we're dealing with a small percentage of the demographic; compared to typical CH enthusiast (or even porn enthusiast).

-TL

barebone123 wrote: Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:53 am

Tittyluvr1334 wrote: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:39 pm

barebone123 wrote: Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:29 pm "which is understandable as she is not the typical demographic for most CHs. "

I still think we need to change up the target market and there is a killer concept for couples here.

I don't disagree at all. But again - we're dealing with a small percentage of the demographic; compared to typical CH enthusiast (or even porn enthusiast).

-TL

Wait...how many married couples are there in the world and what's the divorce rate? How would a little playful T&D among couples, communication and play hurt that demographic? :) (maybe I'm not stating my point correctly)

Tittyluvr1334 wrote: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:01 am

barebone123 wrote: Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:53 am

Tittyluvr1334 wrote: Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:39 pm

I don't disagree at all. But again - we're dealing with a small percentage of the demographic; compared to typical CH enthusiast (or even porn enthusiast).

-TL

Wait...how many married couples are there in the world and what's the divorce rate? How would a little playful T&D among couples, communication and play hurt that demographic? :) (maybe I'm not stating my point correctly)

No you're stating it correct and from our perception - it wouldn't and definitely shouldn't hurt it. And it's easy as hetero males to assume that since we're in to porn and rationalize that it's pure good whole-hearted make-you-feel-good-fun, and believe our female significant others can't possibly see it otherwise - and question the logic of not being in to it.

That being said - I'd dare say that if roles are reversed, I'm sure there are a number of ladies out there that feel that the same healthy relations can be achieved if we men watched hours of Hallmark christmas-movie specials starring Soap Opera hunks.

Both would probably work towards marital longevity. Women from venus / men from mars thing. As an admitted generalization - porn is enjoyed primarily by males because we view sex as a physical act that fulfills a need akin to eating, while women see it as an emotional act which is hard to achieve from porn, but can be simulated through Hallmark christmas-movie specials starring Soap Opera hunks. Again I admit this is a generalization and there are plenty of exceptions to the rules; but the exceptions are the small percentage of demographics that we spoke of earlier.

-TL

book_guy wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:33 pm Sorry if the Beavis n Butthead reference was too obscure for some folks. Didn't mean to make it confusing.

On that subject, I actually found them mildly amusing, but not in a "omigod they are FUNNY" kind of way. I wasn't laughing WITH the character Beavis for his pointing out the stupidity of Butthead (or vice versa), nor was I laughing AT the character Butthead (or vice versa) directly at his stupidity. If that were the limit of the joke, then, indeed, it would be an extremely limited comedy.

Rather, I was laughing at myself for admitting that, way back when I was an adolescent male, I too felt that such stupid jokes were in fact funny. Kind of "trip down memory lane" and "boy I used to be that stupid, too" point-of-view.

Can't say I would have liked to have watched an entire evening binging on episode after episode. Would have gotten old fast. Like with Seinfeld, there are only so many variations you can play on that rather limited theme. After the variations are clear, it's exhausted, and the viewer (or, at least, myself) decides, "Why would I want to continue to invite these grating, annoying people into my living room?" Just because they're annoying? No thanks ...

But for a little bit? Apropos of something appropriate? Sure. Just an offhand. Like the way she eats her peas.

tommyfilth wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:57 pm

book_guy wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:33 pm Sorry if the Beavis n Butthead reference was too obscure for some folks. Didn't mean to make it confusing.

On that subject, I actually found them mildly amusing, but not in a "omigod they are FUNNY" kind of way. I wasn't laughing WITH the character Beavis for his pointing out the stupidity of Butthead (or vice versa), nor was I laughing AT the character Butthead (or vice versa) directly at his stupidity. If that were the limit of the joke, then, indeed, it would be an extremely limited comedy.

Rather, I was laughing at myself for admitting that, way back when I was an adolescent male, I too felt that such stupid jokes were in fact funny. Kind of "trip down memory lane" and "boy I used to be that stupid, too" point-of-view.

Can't say I would have liked to have watched an entire evening binging on episode after episode. Would have gotten old fast. Like with Seinfeld, there are only so many variations you can play on that rather limited theme. After the variations are clear, it's exhausted, and the viewer (or, at least, myself) decides, "Why would I want to continue to invite these grating, annoying people into my living room?" Just because they're annoying? No thanks ...

But for a little bit? Apropos of something appropriate? Sure. Just an offhand. Like the way she eats her peas.

Beavis & Butthead was very much of its time. It wouldn't work now; in fact, MTV tried to reboot it. It wasn't pretty.